Senior Manager (P & D), RIICO Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & ANR[SC 2017]

KEYWORDS:- FINAL REPORT-Protest Petition- Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC would be attracted only when the offences enumerated in the said provision have been committed with respect to a document after it has been produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in any court i.e. during the time when the document was in custodia legis. SUPREME COURT… Read More Senior Manager (P & D), RIICO Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & ANR[SC 2017]

Chand Devi Daga & Ors. Vs. Manju K. Humatani & Ors[SC 2017]

KEYWORD:- Legal representative- prosecution Legal representatives of the complainant to be substituted for prosecuting the complaint if original complainant died. Magistrate had the power to permit a relative to act as the complainant to continue the prosecution The question as to whether the heirs of the complainant can be allowed to file an application under… Read More Chand Devi Daga & Ors. Vs. Manju K. Humatani & Ors[SC 2017]

Inconsistent Laws shall not to be enacted under Indian Constitution

Keywords: Definition of Law 13. Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights (1)  All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Pan, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void. (2) The… Read More Inconsistent Laws shall not to be enacted under Indian Constitution

Puranlal Lakhanpal Vs President of India and others Respondent[SC 1961]

Keywords-Modification The President had the power to make the modification which he did in Art. 81 of the Constitution (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) (Before : P. B. Gajendragadkar, A. K. Sarkar, K. N. Wanchoo, K. C. Das Gupta And N. Rajagopala Ayyangar, JJ.) Writ Petition. No. 139 of 1957, Decided on : 30-03-1961. Constitution of… Read More Puranlal Lakhanpal Vs President of India and others Respondent[SC 1961]

Issue-estoppel

Supreme Court in the case of Masud Khan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1974) 3 SCC 469 had the occasion to consider the question of applicability of principle of “issue-estoppel” to judicial proceedings. Their Lordships speaking through A. Alagiriswami, J. examined the facts of that case in the light of law laid down in several… Read More Issue-estoppel

Venture Global Engineering LLC Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd. & ANR Etc[SC 2017]

KEYWORDS:-Issue estoppel-public policy and fraud-doctrine of “alter ego of the  Company SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [Civil Appeal Nos. 17753-17755 of 2017 arising out of SLP (C) No(S). 29747-29749 of 2013] [Civil Appeal Nos. 17756 of 2017 arising out of SLP (C) No. 8298 of 2014] BENCH :-  (J. CHELAMESWAR) (ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE) ACTS:- Chapters I or II of Part… Read More Venture Global Engineering LLC Vs. Tech Mahindra Ltd. & ANR Etc[SC 2017]

Shobha Nelson Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors[ SC 2017]- service

KEYWORDS:- Unauthorised absence Appellants had not taken the requisite permission from the competent authority before going abroad, no steps were taken by the Respondent to treat the period spent by them in Zanzibar as ‘unauthorised absence’. The Respondent also did not proceed to initiate a departmental inquiry against the Appellants for the alleged delinquency. There… Read More Shobha Nelson Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors[ SC 2017]- service