Abhijit Das Vs. State of Tripura-20/01/2019

The sentence is altered to the period already undergone


Act: Section 324 IPC

[Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2017 @ Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 9253 of 2014]


1. Leave granted.

2. While issuing notice on 19.11.2014, the scope of the notice was limited to the question of sentence.

3. It is not in dispute that the conviction maintained was only under Section 324 IPC. We are informed that the appellant has undergone sentence of around three months.

4. Looking at the nature of injury and other circumstances, we are of the view that the interest of justice would be served in case the sentence is altered to the period already undergone.

Ordered accordingly.

5. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed to the above extent.



Next Post

State of West Bengal Vs Ashutosh Lahiri and others [SC 1994 November]

Sun Dec 17 , 2017
Keywords:- Cow Slaughter- Slaughtering of healthy cows on Bakri Idd is not essential or required for religious purpose of Muslims or in other words it is not a part of religious requirement for a Muslim that a cow must be necessarily scarified for earning religious merit on Bakri Idd. (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of WEST BENGAL Appellant Versus Ashutosh […]

You May Like

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: