All

Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO).

advtanmoy 07/03/2018

Section 211 of the Companies Act, 2013, has accorded statutory status to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). By virtue of various other provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, SFIO is vested with the requisite legal authority to conduct investigation.

 

Next Post

Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Versus Union of India[ALL SC 1970 FEBRUARY]

Thu Mar 8 , 2018
KEYWORDS:-BANK NATIONALISATION- COMPENSATION- DATE :- 10-02-1970. AIR 1970 SC 564 : (1970) 3 SCR 530 : (1970) 1 SCC 248 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Appellant Versus Union of India Respondent And T. M. Gurubaxani Appellant Versus Union of India Respondent (Before : J. C. Shah, S. M. Sikri, J. M. Shelat, V. Bhargava, G. K. Mitter, C. A. […]

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: