What is a “Rarest of Rare Case”?

advtanmoy 09/07/2018

Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P [1973]

  1. Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab [1980]
  2. Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab [1982]
  3. Mithu v. State of Punjab [1983]
  4. State of Punjab v. Harchet Singh [1994]
  5.  Mohd. Chamat v. State (NCT of Delhi) [1998]
  6. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh [2000]
  7. Ram Deo Chauhan and Another v. State of Assam [2000]
  8. Saibanna v. State of Karnataka [2005]
  9. Surendra Pal Shivbalakal v. State of Gujara[2005]
  10. Amrit Singh v. State of Punjab [2007]
  11. Swami Shraddananda v. State of Karnataka [2008]
  12. Santosh Kumar Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra [2009]
  13. Alok Nath Dutt and Others v. State of West Bengal [2006]
  14. Santosh Singh v. State [2010]
  15. Absar Alam v. State of Bihar [2012]
  16. Ramnaresh & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh [2012]
  17. Neel Kumar @AnilKumar v. The State of Haryana [2012]

Next Post

A direction given to file Written Statement without deciding the application under Order 7, Rule 11 of the said Code of 1908 was an irregular exercise of jurisdiction.

Mon Jul 9 , 2018
Bombay High Court Decided on: 12 February 2004 Jaikisan S/O Jaynarayan Bhaiyya vs United Western Bank Ltd. Equivalent citations: 2004 (5) BomCR 705, 2004 (2) MhLj 755 Bench: A Oka 1. By an Order dated 20th January, 2004 it was directed that the present petition shall be decided finally at the admission stage. I had called for the report of the […]

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: