Vaidik injunction for the Sanatan Dharmin

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

सं-समिद युवसे वर्षन्नग्ने विश्वान्यर्य आ | इळस पदेसमिध्यसे स नो वसून्या भर || 

सं गछध्वं सं वदध्वं सं वो मनांसि जानताम | देवा भागं यथा पूर्वे संजानाना उपासते || 

समानो मन्त्रः समितिः समानी समानं मनः सह चित्तमेषाम | समानं मन्त्रमभि मन्त्रये वः समानेन वोहविषा जुहोमि ||

समानी व आकूतिः समाना हर्दयानि वः | समानमस्तु वोमनो यथा वः सुसहासति ||

saṃ-samid yuvase vṛṣannaghne viśvānyarya ā | iḷas padesamidhyase sa no vasūnyā bhara ||
saṃ ghachadhvaṃ saṃ vadadhvaṃ saṃ vo manāṃsi jānatām | devā bhāghaṃ yathā pūrve saṃjānānā upāsate ||
samāno mantraḥ samitiḥ samānī samānaṃ manaḥ saha cittameṣām | samānaṃ mantramabhi maṇtraye vaḥ samānena vohaviṣā juhomi ||
samānī va ākūtiḥ samānā hṛdayāni vaḥ | samānamastu vomano yathā vaḥ susahāsati ||

1. You, young Agni, collect all the Aryas of the world; bring all treasures of the earth for the Aryas.
2. O Aryas move together, speak together with one mind; worship in unison as you unitedly worshipped Him[Agni] earlier.
3. With same ideology, unanimous in judgment, be your mind united for a commonwealth;  with a common purpose and avi I do sacrifice.
4. One and the same be our resolve, and be our hearts; united be the thoughts of our that we all may be victorious.

Next Post

The manager of Joint hindu family is competent to alienate joint family property if it is clearly beneficial to the estate even though there is no legal necessity justifying the transaction.

Fri Jul 13 , 2018
AIR 1964 SC 1385 : (1964) 6 SCR 321 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Balmukand Appellant Versus Kamla Wati and others Respondent (Before : K. Subba Rao And J. R. Mudholkar, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1962,Decided on : 27-01-1964. hindu Law—Joint family property—Benefit of family—Determination of—Sale of joint family property without any difficulty in management of family nor for […]

You May Like

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: