All

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) ICJ authorizes submission of a Reply by India and a Rejoinder by Pakistan and fixes time-limits for filing written pleadings

advtanmoy 18/09/2018

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) before ICJ

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Press release 2018/4
19 January 2018
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) – The Court authorizes the submission of a Reply by India and a Rejoinder by Pakistan and fixes the time-limits for the filing of these written pleadings

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)

 

Order of 17 January 2018

Fixing of time-limits: Reply and Rejoinder

Press release 2017/25
16 June 2017
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) – Fixing of time-limits for the filing of the initial pleadings

Order of 13 June 2017
Fixing of time-limits: Memorial and Counter-Memorial

Press release 2017/22
18 May 2017
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) – Provisional Measures – The Court indicates to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan that it must take “all measures at its disposal” to prevent the execution of an Indian national, Mr. Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, pending final judgment of the Court

Order of 18 May 2017
Request for the indication of provisional measures
Concurring opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade English French Bilingual
Declaration of Judge Bhandari English French Bilingual

Press release 2017/21
17 May 2017
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) – Request for the indication of provisional measures – The Court to deliver its Order tomorrow on Thursday 18 May 2017

Press release 2017/20
15 May 2017
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) – Conclusion of the public hearings on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by India – The Court to begin its deliberation

Verbatim record 2017/5
Public sitting held on Monday 15 May 2017, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Abraham presiding, in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)
Procedure(s): Provisional measures

Verbatim record 2017/6
Public sitting held on Monday 15 May 2017, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Abraham presiding, in the Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)
Procedure(s): Provisional measures
Available in:
Press release 2017/18
10 May 2017
Proceedings instituted by the Republic of India against the Islamic Republic of Pakistan – Request for the indication of provisional measures – The Court to hold public hearings on Monday 15 May 2017

Press release 2017/17
10 May 2017
Proceedings instituted by the Republic of India against the Islamic Republic of Pakistan – Urgent Communication to Pakistan from the President under Article 74, paragraph 4, of the Rules of Court

Press release 2017/16
9 May 2017
The Republic of India institutes proceedings against the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and requests the Court to indicate provisional measures

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) Application -8 May 2017 by Dr. Deepak Mittal,
Joint Secretary,
Ministry of External Affairs,
Government of India.

Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by India
8 May 2017
Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) Urgent Application 08 May 20 17 / )
(Dr. Deepak Mittal)
Joint Secretary
Ministry of External Affairs
Govemmcnt of lndia

 

 

 

Next Post

PRACTICE DIRECTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Tue Sep 18 , 2018
(AS AMENDED ON  20 JANUARY 2009 AND 21 MARCH 2013.) Practice Direction I The Court wishes to discourage the practice of simultaneous deposit of pleadings in cases brought by special agreement. The Court would expect future special agreements to contain provisions as to the number and order of pleadings, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Rules of Court. […]

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: