US Senate voted to confirm Donald Trump nominee Brett Kavanaugh 114th Supreme Court Justice

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

October 07, 2018 The Senate on Saturday voted 50-48 to confirm Republican-sponsored Brett Kavanaugh[1965] to the Supreme Court. It’s among the closest votes on a Supreme Court nominee in the history of USA, and it underscores just how divided this whole process has been. In addition to his 12 years on the DC Circuit, Kavanaugh spent a number of years working for the George W. Bush administration as  White House Staff Secretary (2003–2006).

In 1993, Kavanaugh served as a law clerk to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who he would be replacing if the Senate confirms him.Before he was a partner at DC law firm Kirkland & Ellis, Kavanaugh was associate counsel on the team led by Kenneth Starr, the special prosecutor who investigated former President Bill Clinton’s extramarital affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.From 2001 to 2006, Kavanaugh worked under former President George W. Bush as assistant, staff secretary, and senior associate counsel to the president.Bush nominated him to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, where he has served since 2006. The Senate confirmed him with a vote of 57 to 36.During his time on the DC Circuit Court, Kavanaugh taught at Georgetown Law Center, Yale Law School, and Harvard Law School, where he was hired by Justice Elena Kagan, who was then dean of Harvard Law.

Vote: 50-48

Education: Georgetown Preparatory School, Yale Law School, Yale University,

Next Post

Calcutta HC provides accommodation to Bar Library Club, Bar Association and Incorporated Law Society only for bona fide professional business

Mon Oct 8 , 2018
07-10-1963-There are three sections of the Bar in the Court, viz., (1) those who only plead, (2) those who both plead and act and (3) those who only act. This classification in our opinion is reasonable taking into account the past history to which we have already referred. Grant of separate accommodation therefore to these three sections of the Bar cannot amount to denial of equality before the law. The Bar Library Club has already agreed before us to change its rules so that the Club conforms exactly to the first section; and admission to it will be governed by rules which are common to all lawyers who want only to plead; there is therefore no reason to interfere with accommodation provided by the Court to the three sections of the Bar.

You May Like

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: