The pristine rule that the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused should not be taken as a fossilised doctrine as though it admits no […]
Total War with its incidence of massacre of innocent men, women and children and large-scale destruction of property by perverting the knowledge of science for devising ways and means of destruction in a brutal manner is the product of modern civilisation, if civilisation it can be called. The principles regulating intercourse between residents of belligerent states are not part of international law but are part of the municipal law of every country.
The Right Honourable Syed Ameer Ali in his “Mahommedan Law,” Vol. 1, pages 443, 444, states: Such superiors in India are called Sajjadanashins. (Sqjjada is the carpet on which prayers are offered). […]
Indian principle that in the event of war, priests and properties endowed to places of worship must not be touched: AP High Court
For several centuries, our country had a principle in law of war to the effect that in the event of an invasion also, the priests and properties endowed to places of worship must not be touched. That is how, the properties of Temples remained intact even after the country was subjected to foreign invasions. Instances are not lacking where, the invaders have rendered services also.
Third Geneva Convention (Geneva, 12 August 1949) especially connected with the Treatment of Prisoners of War. A. Prisoners of war, in the sense of the present Convention, are persons belonging to one […]
Islamic war against unbelievers is called Jihad and to do it with finance, bombs, grenades, guns etc is identified by Karnataka High Court
Religious war against those persons who are unbelievers in the name of Islam and such religious war is called as Jihad. So the mind set of the accused persons made it aptly and abundantly clear that they wanted to provoke or preach Jihad and in that direction, they began to make arrangements to preach Muslims and as well to provoke the young Muslim community to declare Jihad with finance, weapons like bombs, grenades, guns etc.
In 2003 SCC (Cri.) 2033 between Nazir Khan and others v. State of Delhi, wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court at Paras 31 to 36 has in detail discussed about what is meant […]
‘Love Jihad’ is not love but prominently religious and under the pretext of love, there are deceitful conversion: Kerala High Court
Inter-religious marriages, arising out of love affairs or otherwise, are to be recognized and promoted. To solemnize such marriages, there need not necessarily be any conversion of one party to the marriage from one religion to another. If a boy or girl believes that a marital union is not possible without the other party to love converting to his or her religion, it is his or her faith.
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH) SINGLE BENCH ( Before : R.B. Naik, J ) ASADULLA H.A. AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA — Respondent Criminal P. No. 7199 of […]
Section 34 of the CPC provides for award of interest during the pendency of the proceedings. The doctrine of promissory estoppel is not limited in its application only to defense but it […]
21.02.2019 – Banning of Unregulated Deposit Ordinance-2019, exempts Individual, Firm, Companies & LLP etc. for taking any loan and deposit for their course of business as per section 2(4) e,f,l and other provisions. Chit […]
Government of India Department of Financial Services Insurance Devision F. No. G-14017/80/2014-Ins.II Dated : 04/09/2018 Survey and loss assessment is a key and critical component in Claims Management. Although the PSGICs already have […]
Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana Atal Pension Yojana Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana Stand Up India
Mandamus which is a discretionary remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution is requested to be issued, inter alia, to compel performance of public duties which may be administrative, ministerial or statutory in nature.
In M.S. Bindra Vs. Union of India and Others[(1998) AIR(SC) 3058], it was held: While evaluating the materials the authority should not altogether ignore the reputation in which the officer was held […]
Scope of Judicial Review: (i) It is settled legal proposition that judicial review is not akin to adjudication on merit by re-appreciating the evidence as an Appellate Authority. The only consideration the […]
A. In M.V. Bijlani Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others, this Court held: “… Disciplinary proceedings, however, being quasi criminal in nature, there should be some evidences to prove the charge. […]
The scope of Article 25 has been repeatedly interpreted by the Apex Court right from its leading judgment in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v. The State of Bombay [(1962)SUPP SCR 496] […]