The Rajasthan High Court in Anil Kumar and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan, (1992) CriLJ 3637 , while dealing with an identical issue, in Paragraph No. 13 held as follows:– “13. The term, “minor offence” has to be interpreted...
Day: March 5, 2019
The age of prosecutrix is differently mentioned at different stages. In the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., her age is stated to be about 17 years, whereas in the FIR her age is shown to be about 16 years....
(2016) 162 AIC 797 SIKKIM HIGH COURT SINGLE BENCH ( Before : Mrs. Meenakshi Madan Rai, J. ) NITI RAJ SUBBA — Appellant Vs. STATE OF SIKKIM — Respondent Crl. A. No. 16 of 2015 Decided on : 29-04-2016...
Special Court has not exercised the discretion judiciously and the reasons which are given by the learned Special Court while imposing the sentence minimum only are not germane and it can be said that by not awarding appropriate punishment...
On January 1, 1976, under the Trade Act of 1974 to promote economic growth in the developing countries a mechanism was created to provide duty-free goods to flow in the USA market from the designated beneficiary countries. under it the...
You must be logged in to post a comment.