The scope of interference in the matter of policy framed by the Government by courts is well settled. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2001) 3 SCC 635 (Ugar […]
All administrative power vested in public authority must be structured within a system of controls informed by both relevance and reason
I can refer to two decisions of the Apex Court in relation to exercise of controlled discretion and quote relevant passages from them. The first would be the case of Suman Gupta […]
In Julius v. Bishop of Oxford (1880) 5 A.C. 214 it was observed by Cairns, L.C., at pp. 222-223 that the words “it shall be lawful” conferred a faculty or power, and they did not of themselves do more than confer a faculty or power.
The rates are applicable for deposits of below Rs. 1 crore. As per 1st March 2019 Bank of India Investment Period FD rates for Regular deposits FD rates for Senior Citizen 7 […]
निर्वाण षट्कम मनोबुद्धयहंकारचित्तानि नाहम् – न च श्रोत्र जिह्वे न च घ्राण नेत्रे न च व्योम भूमिर्न तेजॊ न वायु: चिदानन्द रूप: शिवोऽहम् शिवोऽहम् ॥1॥ न च प्राण संज्ञो न वै पञ्चवायु: […]
In the case of Unni Krishnan, J.P. and others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others etc. etc., the Apex Court held thus: ” Private educational institutions may be aided as well […]
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ( Before : L. M. Sharma, C.J; S. Ratnavel Pandian, J; S. P. Bharucha, J; S. Mohan, J; B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J ) UNNI KRISHNAN, J.P. […]
The issue of religious education was examined by University Education Commission headed by Dr. Radhakrishnan. The Commission recommended in its Report of 1948-49 that the intention behind secular state was not to […]
Indeed, the qualifications and disqualifications are bound to vary from category to category and would depend on the post, experience and the stream from where a person is being nominated as a Director.
Suppressing the fact at the time of seeking enrolment in the Bar Council pertains to being in Government service in the State of Himachal Pradesh and involvement in a criminal case and Subsequent acquittal cannot come to the rescue an applicant. Section 26 of the Advocates Act, 1961 confers power on the Bar Council of India to remove the name of a person who entered on the Roll of Advocates by misrepresentation.
The Advocates Act 1961 is applicable in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. 58AF. Special provisions in relation to Jammu and Kashmir – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, all advocates who, […]