KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SINGLE BENCH
( Before : P.D. Dinakaran, C.J )
SRI MURUGESH — Appellant
Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA — Respondent
Criminal P. No. 932 of 2009
Decided on : 17-03-2009
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Section 302, Section 498A
Counsel for Appearing Parties
Amar A. Correa, for the Appellant; Basavaraj Kareddy, GA., for the Respondent
ORDER
P.D. Dinakaran, C.J.—Heard.
2. The Petitioner is arrested for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 302 of IPC. According to the learned SPP, investigationInvestigation Purpose of all investigation is to reveal the unvarnished truth. The constitutional courts are duty bound to ensure that the truth is revealed. is already over and the charge-sheet also has been filed and the case is committed for trial.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 15.000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court, subject to the following conditions.
a. The petitioner shall report before the concerned jurisdictional Court where the case is pending, on every Monday of the first week of every month at 10 am and thereafter, shall also make himself available before the respondent as and when required.
b. Petitioner shall not leave the jurisdictional police limits without prior permission.
c. Petitioner shall not tamper with the witnesses or in any manner interfere with or put obstacle to the investigation,
d. Breach of any one of the above conditions will entitle the prosecution to move this Court for cancellation of the bail granted.
More Stories
Govt will pay bail up to Rs 40K for poor under-trial prisoners: HM scheme
Judicial corruption has on every occasion indicated that the causative factor is traceable to a corrupt lawyer (KHC-4/07/1998)
When Supreme Court interfered in case of High Court refused Anticipatory Bail (02/12/2022)