ভক্তিসিদ্ধান্ত সরস্বতী – Bhakti Siddhanta Saraswati Literatures

advtanmoy 04/10/2019
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Bimala Prasad Datta, (DOB-06/02/1874), S/O Kedarnath Datta (1838–1914)

  • মণি-মঞ্জরী  (১৯২৫)
  • প্রমেয় রত্নাবলী
  • শ্রীহরিভক্তিকল্পলতিকা
  • সদাচার-স্মৃতিঃ
  • প্রাকৃতরস-শতদূষণী
  • সাধন-পথ

ভক্তিসিদ্ধান্ত সরস্বতী (১৮৭৪–১৯৩৬)

Vaishnava Literature.JPG

Bimala Prasad Datta

Last-will-of-Siddhanta-Saraswati

Home › Forums › ভক্তিসিদ্ধান্ত সরস্বতী – Bhakti Siddhanta Saraswati Literatures

Tagged: ,

Viewing 0 reply threads
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Next Post

মাইকেল মধুসূদন দত্ত - Michael Madhusudan Dutt

Fri Oct 4 , 2019
মধুসূদনের সময়ে কালেজের অনেক ছাত্র সুরাপান করাকে বাহাদুরির কাজ মনে করিত। মধু তাঁহাদের মধ্যে একজন অগ্রগণ্য ছিলেন। এতদ্ব্যতীত অপরাপর অসমসাহসিক পাপকাৰ্য্যেও তিনি লিপ্ত হইতেন। পিতামাতা দেখিয়াও দেখিতেন না; বরং অর্থ যোগাইয়া প্রকারান্তরে উৎসাহদান করিতেন।

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: