NATIONAL HEADLINES
INTER-GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTATIONS: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and German Chancellor Angela Merkel today co-chaired the fifth Inter-Governmental Consultations. IndiaIndia Bharat Varsha (Jambu Dvipa) is the name of this land mass. The people of this land are Sanatan Dharmin and they always defeated invaders. Indra (10000 yrs) was the oldest deified King of this land. Manu's jurisprudence enlitened this land. Vedas have been the civilizational literature of this land. Guiding principles of this land are : सत्यं वद । धर्मं चर । स्वाध्यायान्मा प्रमदः । Read more and Germany signed five joint declarations of intent and inked 11 pacts in fields such as space, civil aviation, maritime technology, medicineMedicine Refers to the practices and procedures used for the prevention, treatment, or relief of symptoms of diseases or abnormal conditions. This term may also refer to a legal drug used for the same purpose. and education.
DELHI: A Supreme Court mandated panel today declared a public health emergency in the Delhi-NCR region as the pollution levels in the region entered the “severe plus” category. The SC banned construction activity till November 5.On the other hand the Environment Pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority banned the bursting of crackers during the winter season.
TAMIL NADU: President of India Ramnnath Kobind on 29th October, approved The Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce and livestock contractContract An agreement enforceable by law is a contract. All agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. Indian Contract Act. farming and services Act 2019. This act aims o set a policy framework and institutional mechanism on agricultural produce and contract farming. Tamil Nadu thus became the first state to enact this law.
KARTARPUR: Sikhs pilgrims to Kartarpur won’t need passport PM Imran Khan Twitted,”for Sikhs coming for pilgrimage to Kartarpur from India, I have waived off two requirements: i) they won’t need a passport-just a valid ID; ii)they no longer have to register 10 days in advance. Also, no fee to be charged on day of inauguration and on Guruji’s 550th birthday.”
- PM Imran announces special waivers for Sikh guests as Kartarpur inauguration nears
- Government officials around the globe targeted for hacking through WhatsApp
- EC announces 5-phase Jharkhand election starting Nov 30, result on Dec 23
INTERNATIONAL HEADLINES
WTOWTO The World Trade Organization (164 Members) is the only global international organization dealing with the rules of trade between nations. At its heart are the WTO agreements, negotiated and signed by the bulk of the world’s trading nations and ratified in their parliaments. The WTO operates the global system of trade rules and helps developing economies build their trade capacity. Observer governments> Algeria- Andorra- Azerbaijan- Bahamas- Belarus- Bhutan- Bosnia and Herzegovina- Comoros- Curaçao- Equatorial Guinea- Ethiopia- Holy See- Iran- Iraq- Lebanese Republic- Libya- Sao Tomé and Principe- Serbia- Somalia- South Sudan- Sudan- Syrian Arab Republic- Timor-Leste- Turkmenistan- Uzbekistan-: The World Trade Organization has ruled against India in a crucial trade dispute with the US, ordering all exportExport How to export: Canada-India-USA promotion schemes to be stopped within the next four months. The WTO also said the SEZ Scheme should be closed within the next six months.
Pakistan: The government of Pakistan on 29th October, released a new coin worth Pakistan rupees 50 to commemorate the 550 birth anniversary of Guru Nanak Dev . It will be available at the Kartarpur sahib.
AZADI MARCH: PM Imran khan said,”gone are the days when one used to use Islam to gain power. This is a new Pakistan. Sit however long you want. When your food runs out, we will send more. But we will not give you an NRO”. PM indicated the ‘Azadi March’ protesters zoomed in Islamabad.
ECONOMY HEADLINES
Delhi: The Delhi High Court today issued a notice to the Central government and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on public interest litigation (PIL) petition for guidelines to safeguard money deposited by people in various cooperative banks across the country. The petition, filed in the wake of the Punjab & Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank fraud crisis, has sought a direction to the government and the RBI to constitute a high-powered committee for looking into the complete affairs of the working of cooperative banks.
UNEMPLOYMENT: India’s unemployment rate in October rose to 8.5%, the highest since August 2016, and up from 7.2% in September, according to data released by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) on Friday. The data reflects the impact of a slowdown in the economy.
PEPSICO: US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on 31st October presented the prestigious Award for Corporate Excellence to Pepsico India for its efforts to save more than 17 billions of litres of water through community water programs and positively impacting thousands of community members.
MARUTI SUZUKI: The country’s largest car maker Maruti Suzuki India reported a 4.5% rise in sales at 1,53,435 units in October. The company had sold 146,766 units in October last year. Domestic sales increased by 2.3% at 1,39,121 units last month as against 1,35,948 units in October 2018.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) on Friday fixed phone call ring timeTime Where any expression of it occurs in any Rules, or any judgment, order or direction, and whenever the doing or not doing of anything at a certain time of the day or night or during a certain part of the day or night has an effect in law, that time is, unless it is otherwise specifically stated, held to be standard time as used in a particular country or state. (In Physics, time and Space never exist actually-“quantum entanglement”) at 30 seconds on mobiles and 60 seconds for landline phones, in case the call is neither answered nor rejected by the susbcriber. TRAI today notified the standards of quality of service of basic telephone service (wireline) and cellular mobile telephone service (seventh amendment) regulations, 2019 (8 of 2019) that is proposed to specify the duration of call alert for called party in telecommunication networks.
MARKET HEADLINES
- SENSEX- 40165.03 (35.98)
- NIFTY-11890.60 (13.15)
- GOLD (MCX 10 GM)-38338.00 (-240.00)
- SILVER (MCX 1 KG)-46470.00 (-294.00)
- USD ($) / INR(Rupees Icon)-70.67 (0.13)
- Oct GST collections remain lower at Rs 95,380 cr despite bumper festive season sale.
- YES Bank posts net loss of Rs 629 cr in Sept quarter
- WhatsApp says it agrees with govt, has taken strong action
- Competition Commission of India (CCI) sought more information from Amazon.com on its deal with Future group. Future Retail runs 290 budget department and grocery stores branded “Big Bazaar”.
SUPREME COURT PASSED FOLLOWING JUDGMENTS IN THE MONTH OF OCTOBER
| S.No. 1 | Diary Number | 348 / 2017 | JudgmentJudgment The statement given by the Judge on the grounds of a decree or order - CPC 2(9). It contains a concise statement of the case, points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision - Order 20 Rule 4(2). Section 354 of CrPC requires that every judgment shall contain points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision. Indian Supreme Court Decisions > Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts (Art 141 Indian Constitution) Civil and judicial authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court (Art 144) Supreme Court Network On Judiciary – Portal > Denning: “Judges do not speak, as do actors, to please. They do not speak, as do advocates, to persuade. They do not speak, as do historians, to recount the past. They speak to give Judgment. And in their judgments, you will find passages, which are worthy to rank with the greatest literature….” Law Points on Judgment Writing > The judge must write to provide an easy-to-understand analysis of the issues of law and fact which arise for decision. Judgments are primarily meant for those whose cases are decided by judges (State Bank of India and Another Vs Ajay Kumar Sood SC 2022) |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007802-007802 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT COROPORATION | ||
| Respondent Name | DANISH KHAN . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ANISH R. SHAH | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 2 | Diary Number | 558 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007951-007951 / 2019 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF BIHAR | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S RIGA SUGAR CO. LTD. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GAURAV KEJRIWAL | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 3 | Diary Number | 825 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008146-008146 / 2019 | 25-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAJASTHAN PUBLIC COMMISSION AJMER | ||
| Respondent Name | SHIKUN RAM FIRODA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SURYA KANT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 4 | Diary Number | 1530 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-001090-001090 / 2010 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | BARASAT EYE HOSPITAL THR. ITS REP. | ||
| Respondent Name | KAUSTABH MONDAL | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | S. K. BHATTACHARYA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| S.No. 5 | Diary Number | 2775 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007879-007879 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF BIHAR | ||
| Respondent Name | DEVENDRA SHARMA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ABHINAV MUKERJI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | MANU SHANKER MISHRA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 6 | Diary Number | 2919 / 2006 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003278-003278 / 2012 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | JAGJIWAN COOP. HOUSE BLDG. SOC. LTD&ANR | ||
| Respondent Name | LT. GOVERNOR, N.C.T. OF DELHI . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | SAHARYA & CO. | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 7 | Diary Number | 3655 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008227-008227 / 2019 | 23-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | GO AIRLINES(INDIA) LTD. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PARIJAT SINHA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | KARANJAWALA & CO. | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||
| S.No. 8 | Diary Number | 3781 / 2014 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008175-008175 / 2019 | 21-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | OM PARKASH | ||
| Respondent Name | AMAR SINGH . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GAGAN GUPTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 9 | Diary Number | 4095 / 2008 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-001399-001399 / 2010 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAMESH NIVRUTTI BHAGWAT | ||
| Respondent Name | SURENDRA MANOHAR PARAKHE | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ABHA R. SHARMA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | V. D. KHANNA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 10 | Diary Number | 5516 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008114-008114 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | ONGC LABOUR UNION | ||
| Respondent Name | ONGC DEHRADUN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SATYA MITRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| S.No. 11 | Diary Number | 5922 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-010194-010194 / 2013 | 14-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | ||
| Respondent Name | S.K.SINGH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| S.No. 12 | Diary Number | 6097 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007804-007813 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M AND M) CORP LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | P P SURESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 13 | Diary Number | 6441 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007939-007939 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | YATINKUMAR JASUBHAI PATEL | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GAURAV AGRAWAL | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 14 | Diary Number | 6756 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | MA-000712 / 2019 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Respondent Name | SHRI HARANANDA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Gaichangpou Gangmei | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 15 | Diary Number | 7458 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008042-008042 / 2019 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | JOHN D SOUZA | ||
| Respondent Name | KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONCorporation A legally established entity that can enter into contracts, own assets and incur debt, as well as sue and be sued—all separately from its owner(s). The term covers both for-profit and nonprofit corporations and includes nonstock corporations, incorporated membership organizations, incorporated cooperatives, incorporated trade associations, professional corporations and, under certain circumstances, limited liability companies. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PETITIONER-IN-PERSON | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| S.No. 16 | Diary Number | 7636 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001416-001417 / 2017 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | ISHWARI LAL YADAV | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF CHHATTISGARH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KABIR DIXIT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| S.No. 17 | Diary Number | 7691 / 2010 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001889-001889 / 2010 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAJENDER @ RAJESH @ RAJU | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE (NCT OF DELHI) | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUSHIL BALWADA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | B. V. BALARAM DAS | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 18 | Diary Number | 8189 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001523-001524 / 2019 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAVISHANKAR @ BABA VISHWAKARMA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ASHA GOPALAN NAIR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| S.No. 19 | Diary Number | 8700 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-009036-009038 / 2016 | 23-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ETC. | ||
| Respondent Name | MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJAY KAPUR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VIKAS KUMAR | ||
| Bench | |||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 20 | Diary Number | 8724 / 2010 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008015-008016 / 2019 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | WALAITI RAM CHARAN DASS | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF PUNJAB . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | AMITA GUPTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 21 | Diary Number | 9503 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | MA-000814 / 2019 | 25-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) 1 | ||
| Respondent Name | NRA IRON AND STEEL PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIL KATIYAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| S.No. 22 | Diary Number | 9681 / 2006 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-001090-001090 / 2008 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | BRIJESH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | SHARDABAI(DEAD) BY LRS | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | T. N. SINGH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | PRATIBHA JAIN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 23 | Diary Number | 9770 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-006524-006524 / 2009 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S TEJPARAS ASSOCIATES | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RAMESH CHANDRA MISHRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA | ||
| S.No. 24 | Diary Number | 10043 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008121 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | IC 29547 L BOBBY JOSEPH | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ALOK GUPTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 25 | Diary Number | 10532 / 2013 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000690-000690 / 2014 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | ||
| Respondent Name | UDHAM | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | S. RAMAMANI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA | ||
| S.No. 26 | Diary Number | 10738 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-005153 / 2019 | 15-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | H. S. YADAV | ||
| Respondent Name | SHAKUNTALA DEVI PARAKH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DEVASHISH BHARUKA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 27 | Diary Number | 12243 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | R.P.(Crl.) No.-000228 / 2018 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 28 | Diary Number | 12605 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001545-001545 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | UTTAM RAM | ||
| Respondent Name | DEVINDER SINGH HUDAN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | B. S. BANTHIA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 29 | Diary Number | 12985 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007843-007843 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | AMBALAL SARABHAI ENTERPRISES LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | K.S. INFRASPACE LLP | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA | ||
| S.No. 30 | Diary Number | 13020 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008265-008266 / 2019 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SHREE RAM URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KARANJAWALA & CO. | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 31 | Diary Number | 13336 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001619-001619 / 2019 | 25-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | MISS XYZ | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHAKUN SHARMA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| S.No. 32 | Diary Number | 13412 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001517-001517 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | MANI PUSHPAK JOSHI | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | LALITA KAUSHIK | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 33 | Diary Number | 13697 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007798-007798 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | M/S MADHOOR BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR | ||
| Respondent Name | YEOLA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 34 | Diary Number | 13945 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-002837-002837 / 2011 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAVI SETIA | ||
| Respondent Name | MADAN LAL | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | AMIT ANAND TIWARI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | V. N. RAGHUPATHY | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 35 | Diary Number | 14169 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-004452 / 2019 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | CHANDRA PRAKASH BUDAKOTI | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SRISHTI AGNIHOTRI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 36 | Diary Number | 14400 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008259-008259 / 2019 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | GOVT. OF NCT DELHI | ||
| Respondent Name | PRADEEP KUMAR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | B. V. BALARAM DAS | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| S.No. 37 | Diary Number | 14401 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-010521-010521 / 2013 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | PRUTHVIRAJSINH N JADEJA(D) BY LRS. | ||
| Respondent Name | JAYESHKUMAR CHHAKADDASM SHAH . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUMITA RAY | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VIKAS MEHTA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 38 | Diary Number | 15702 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007532-007533 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | C/M KISAN INTER COLLEGE MANAGER | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ASHOK KUMAR SINGH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 39 | Diary Number | 15944 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008069-008069 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | M. HARIHARASUDHAN | ||
| Respondent Name | R. KARMEGAM | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M.P. Parthiban | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 40 | Diary Number | 16160 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007477-007477 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAMESH PARSRAM MALANI AND ORS.. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF TELANGANA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RAMESH KUMAR MISHRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 41 | Diary Number | 16568 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-002723-002723 / 2015 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | DIST.COLLECTOR SATARA | ||
| Respondent Name | MANGESH NIVRUTTI KASHID | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| S.No. 42 | Diary Number | 17179 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | MA-000910-000924 / 2019 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH | ||
| Respondent Name | GRACE SATHYAVATHY SHASHIKANT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | ||
| S.No. 43 | Diary Number | 17259 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008276-008277 / 2019 | 25-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER/ DEHAR POWER HOUSE CIRCLE BHAKRA BEAS MANAGEMENT BOARD (PW) SLAPPER | ||
| Respondent Name | EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICER, SUNDERNAGAR/ASSESSING AUTHORITY | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 44 | Diary Number | 17296 / 2015 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007991-007991 / 2019 | 14-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | ||
| Respondent Name | SABAL SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | C. D. SINGH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 45 | Diary Number | 17854 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-013117 / 2019 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF JHARKHAND | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S HSS INTEGRATED SDN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DEVASHISH BHARUKA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 46 | Diary Number | 17893 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001835-001835 / 2010 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SATISH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF HARYANA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUBHRO SANYAL | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | MONIKA GUSAIN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| S.No. 47 | Diary Number | 17905 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-004696-004696 / 2013 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | R.SRINIVAS KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | R.SHAMETHA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 48 | Diary Number | 18949 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001563-001563 / 2019 | 15-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Respondent Name | GAUTAM KHAITAN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIL KATIYAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| S.No. 49 | Diary Number | 19259 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000905-000905 / 2010 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH | ||
| Respondent Name | RAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIL SHRIVASTAV | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| S.No. 50 | Diary Number | 19615 / 2010 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-006638-006638 / 2010 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | NARESH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | P. NARASIMHAN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN | ||
| S.No. 51 | Diary Number | 19901 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | R.P.(Crl.) No.-000401-000402 / 2012 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SUDAM @ RAHUL KANIRAM JADHAV | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHADAN FARASAT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 52 | Diary Number | 21194 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-012743-012743 / 2017 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | KARAN SINGH | ||
| Respondent Name | DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PETITIONER-IN-PERSON | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ASHA GOPALAN NAIR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 53 | Diary Number | 21623 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008198-008199 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | M/S TERAI TEA COMPANY LIMITED | ||
| Respondent Name | KUMKUM MITTAL | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | HIREN DASAN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 54 | Diary Number | 21628 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007784-007787 / 2019 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | KANTABAI VASANT AHIR | ||
| Respondent Name | SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIRUDDHA DESHMUKH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 55 | Diary Number | 21734 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001541-001541 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAJ KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHANTANU BANSAL | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 56 | Diary Number | 22123 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-000956-000956 / 2010 | 25-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | STATE OF M.P. . | ||
| Respondent Name | MURTI SHRI CHATURBHUJNATH . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | C. D. SINGH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | RANDHIR SINGH JAIN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 57 | Diary Number | 22233 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-005120 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | A.J. AGROCHEM | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | TARUN GUPTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 58 | Diary Number | 22290 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007757-007757 / 2019 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE AND ORS | ||
| Respondent Name | JANAK RAJ SHARMA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANUVRAT SHARMA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA | ||
| S.No. 59 | Diary Number | 22346 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007627-007627 / 2019 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S SUNBEAM HIGH TECH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LTD | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | J S WAD AND CO | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 60 | Diary Number | 22352 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007849-007849 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | BIJAY KUMAR SINGH | ||
| Respondent Name | AMIT KUMAR CHAMARIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SARLA CHANDRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 61 | Diary Number | 22507 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001573-001575 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | DR. LAKSHMAN | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF KARNATAKA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| S.No. 62 | Diary Number | 22746 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003311-003311 / 2015 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | S.P.MISRA | ||
| Respondent Name | MOHD.LAIQUDDIN KHAN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | A. SUBBA RAO | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| S.No. 63 | Diary Number | 22885 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-005919-005919 / 2011 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | PRAHLAD PRADHAN | ||
| Respondent Name | SONU KUMHAR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KUMUD LATA DAS | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | T. MAHIPAL | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | ||
| S.No. 64 | Diary Number | 23627 / 2015 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-006328-006399 / 2015 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Respondent Name | ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | D. S. MAHRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 65 | Diary Number | 23788 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001949-001949 / 2009 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | M.RAMALINGAM | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 66 | Diary Number | 24126 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-000885 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | VIDHI HIMMAT KATARIYA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 67 | Diary Number | 24502 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001692-001692 / 2009 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | EBHA ARJUN JADEJA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJAY JAIN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 68 | Diary Number | 24859 / 2007 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-000142-000142 / 2009 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | MUNICIPAL CORPN.OF GREATER MUMBAI | ||
| Respondent Name | HARISH LAMBA OF BOMBAY, INDIAN INHABITANT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | HARDEEP SINGH ANAND | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR | ||
| S.No. 69 | Diary Number | 25331 / 2012 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008896-008897 / 2012 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SURGEON REAR ADMIRAL MANISHA JAIPRAKASH | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | NARESH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 70 | Diary Number | 25495 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008003-008003 / 2019 | 14-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SHIVKUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | S. N. BHAT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 71 | Diary Number | 25664 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008298-008298 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF MANIPUR | ||
| Respondent Name | KOTING LAMKANG | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | LEISHANGTHEM ROSHMANI KH | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| S.No. 72 | Diary Number | 27167 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001572-001572 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONInvestigation Purpose of all investigation is to reveal the unvarnished truth. The constitutional courts are duty bound to ensure that the truth is revealed. | ||
| Respondent Name | ARVIND KHANNA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| S.No. 73 | Diary Number | 27850 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007672 / 2019 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | NO. 14666828M. EX CFN NARSINGH YADAV | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | AISHWARYA BHATI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 74 | Diary Number | 28146 / 2017 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001586-001586 / 2019 | 21-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | M. SRIKANTH | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF TELANGANA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | D. BHARATHI REDDY | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| S.No. 75 | Diary Number | 28393 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000937-000937 / 2011 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | FAINUL KHAN | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF JHARKHAND | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUDARSHAN RAJAN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ANIL K. JHA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 76 | Diary Number | 29731 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-002181-002181 / 2009 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL | ||
| Respondent Name | INDRAJIT KUNDU | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PLR CHAMBERS AND CO. | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY | ||
| S.No. 77 | Diary Number | 29950 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008263-008263 / 2019 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | LT COL. PARAMJIT SINGH DHILLON | ||
| Respondent Name | HARINDER SINGH GHUMAN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| S.No. 78 | Diary Number | 30432 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001515-001516 / 2019 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SATISH UKEY | ||
| Respondent Name | DEVENDRA GANGADHARRAO FADNAVIS | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | BALRAJ DEWAN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | ||
| S.No. 79 | Diary Number | 31835 / 2013 | Judgment |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-031982-031983 / 2013 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | NUSLI NEVILLE WADIA | ||
| Respondent Name | IVORY PROPERTIES | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KARANJAWALA & CO. | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | |||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 80 | Diary Number | 32414 / 2013 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001560-001560 / 2019 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | PREM SINGH | ||
| Respondent Name | SUKHDEV SINGH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | VINEET BHAGAT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 81 | Diary Number | 32714 / 2015 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-009276-009290 / 2015 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. NDPL HOUSE | ||
| Respondent Name | MANOJ MISHRA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 82 | Diary Number | 33057 / 2015 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008219-008219 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | BIHAR INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY | ||
| Respondent Name | AMIT KUMAR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | GAURAV AGRAWAL | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA | ||
| S.No. 83 | Diary Number | 33063 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-003019-003019 / 2017 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | AIR CMDE NAVEEN JAIN | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SRIDHAR POTARAJU | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 84 | Diary Number | 33290 / 2007 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-006049-006049 / 2007 | 24-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SIRDAR K.B.RAMACHANDRA RAJ URS (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. | ||
| Respondent Name | SARAH C URS | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PARIJAT SINHA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VIKAS MEHTA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA | ||
| S.No. 85 | Diary Number | 35510 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-007764-007764 / 2019 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | VIRUDHUNAGAR HINDUHindu A geographical name given by non-Hindus, who came to visit Bharatvarsha (Hindusthan). Sanatan Dharma is the actual Dharmic tradition of the Hindus. People who live in Hindusthan are Hindu, whether they Follow Islam, Chris, Buddha, Mahavira, or Nanaka. In this way, Tribals are also Hindu. NADARGAL DHARMA PARIBALANA SABAI | ||
| Respondent Name | TUTICORIN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| S.No. 86 | Diary Number | 35581 / 2013 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000478-000479 / 2017 | 16-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | VINUBHAI HARIBHAI MALAVIYA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | NACHIKETA JOSHI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | HEMANTIKA WAHI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | ||
| S.No. 87 | Diary Number | 35965 / 2019 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001603-001603 / 2019 | 22-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | P CHIDAMBARAM | ||
| Respondent Name | CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PALLAVI LANGAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||
| S.No. 88 | Diary Number | 35967 / 2007 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-004139-004139 / 2008 | 21-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | STRESSED ASSETS STABILIZATION FUND | ||
| Respondent Name | WEST BENGAL SMALL IND. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | JASMINE DAMKEWALA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| S.No. 89 | Diary Number | 36073 / 2008 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-002869-002870 / 2010 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | MOHINDER KAUR | ||
| Respondent Name | SANT PAUL SINGH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | TANUJ BAGGA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VINEET BHAGAT | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| S.No. 90 | Diary Number | 36444 / 2008 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-005308-005308 / 2010 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | SMT. KASTURIBAI SUKHARAM KHANDELWAL TRUST | ||
| Respondent Name | INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PRATIBHA JAIN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | SANJAY KAPUR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 91 | Diary Number | 36452 / 2009 | Judgment |
| Case Number | SLP(C) No.-033825-033825 / 2009 | 17-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | IDBI BANK LIMITED THROUGH DGM (LEGAL) | ||
| Respondent Name | THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, OFFICE OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF COMPANIES AND ANR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ASTHA TYAGI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | K. K. MANI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR | ||
| S.No. 92 | Diary Number | 36533 / 2015 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-000026-000026 / 2016 | 01-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | KRISHNA DEVI MAHESHWARI | ||
| Respondent Name | SURENDRA SUREKHA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | R. D. UPADHYAY | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||
| S.No. 93 | Diary Number | 36582 / 2008 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-004184-004184 / 2009 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | STATE OF WEST BENGAL | ||
| Respondent Name | CALCUTTA CLUB LIMITED | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | PARTHA SIL | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | ||
| S.No. 94 | Diary Number | 39218 / 2016 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001488-001489 / 2018 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAVI | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHADAN FARASAT | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| S.No. 95 | Diary Number | 41935 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001598-001598 / 2019 | 21-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | RAHUL SUDHAKAR ANANTWAR | ||
| Respondent Name | SHIVKUMAR KANHIYALAL SHRIVASTAV | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHEKHAR KUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||
| S.No. 96 | Diary Number | 45835 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | C.A. No.-008132-008132 / 2019 | 18-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. 6 | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S I VEN INTERACTIVE LTD. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIL KATIYAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| S.No. 97 | Diary Number | 46037 / 2018 | Judgment |
| Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001519-001519 / 2019 | 04-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | KANTILAL | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | JAIKRITI S. JADEJA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| S.No. 98 | Diary Number | 62174 / 1990 | Judgment |
| Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-000876-000876 / 1996 | 03-10-2019 (English) | |
| Petitioner Name | OKHLA ENCLAVE PLOT HOLDERS WEL. ASON. | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SUMITA HAZARIKA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | P. PARMESWARAN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI | ||
More Stories
Polit Bureau of the CPI (Marxist) on Ayodhya Temple Invitation
Ayurveda is closely linked with Indian culture, Nature and the environment-PM Modi
ALL News Headlines 2019 November 2ND