Permanent Court of Arbitration Schedule of Fees and Costs

advtanmoy 08/03/2020
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The PCA is an intergovernmental organization devoted chiefly to the administration of international dispute resolution proceedings involving at least one state, state-controlled entity, or intergovernmental organization. As such, the PCA does not seek to provide full administrative services in disputes exclusively between private parties.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The PCA is an intergovernmental organization created chiefly to the administration of international dispute resolution proceedings involving at least one state, state-controlled entity, or intergovernmental organization. As such, the PCA does not seek to provide full administrative services in disputes exclusively between private parties. However, the PCA Secretary-General will designate appointing authorities in cases between private parties under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (in accordance with the role he is given under those rules)[Source: PCA FAQ]

Updated – March 2020

This Schedule of Fees & Costs applies to the following PCA services.

All amounts are given in euro and are subject to change

Designation of an Appointing Authority pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

  • Non-refundable processing fee € 3000
  • Acting as an Appointing Authority pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
  • Non-refundable processing fee €3000

Registry Services provided by the International Bureau

  • Secretary-General € 275/hour
  • Deputy Secretary-General € 275/hour
  • Legal Staff € 195/hour
  • Assistant Legal Staff € 145/hour
  • Secretarial/Clerical € 60/hour

The International Bureau can arrange for estimates for the following on request:

  • verbatim transcription
  • interpretation
  • translation
  • document reproduction
  • sound and audiovisual equipment
  • tele- and videoconferencing

For estimates please contact: bureau@pca-cpa.org

Hearing Facilities at :

  • Peace Palace (The Hague)
  • Port Louis (Mauritius)
  • Maxwell Chambers (Singapore)
  • Palacio San Martín (Buenos Aires)
  • Other facilities available through Host Country and Cooperation Agreements

Permanent Court of Arbitration

Peace Palace
Carnegieplein 2
2517 KJ The Hague
The Netherlands

T: +31 70 302 4165
F: +31 70 302 4167
E-mail: bureau@pca-cpa.org

Next Post

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013

Mon Mar 9 , 2020
These Rules shall govern the arbitration except that where any of these Rules is in conflict with a provision of the law applicable­ to the arbitration from which the parties cannot derogate,­ that provision­ shall prevail.
ICJ

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: