Mining Laws in India

advtanmoy 11/05/2020
Enactment Date Act Number Short Title Purpose and Gist
16-Oct-1885 18 The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885
28-Dec-1957 67 The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
7-Sep-1976 100 The Metal Corporation (Nationalisation and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1976
25-Dec-1983 42 The Mines (Amendment) Act, 1983
23-May-1987 16 The Goa, Daman and Diu Mining Concessions (Abolition and Declaration as Mining Leases) Act, 1987
4-Apr-1992 16 The Cess and Other Taxes on Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992
30-Jan-2003 17 The Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002

Next Post

Road Transport and Highway Laws-India

Mon May 11 , 2020
Enactment Date Act Number Short Title Purpose and Gist 4-Jun-1851 08 The Indian Tolls Act, 1851 11-Apr-1856 09 The Indian Bills of Lading Act 1856 7-Jul-1861 16 The Stage-Carriages Act, 1861 24-Mar-1864 15 The Indian Tolls Act, 1864 9-Nov-1878 17 The Northern Indian Ferries Act, 1878 12-Mar-1886 11 The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 4-Dec-1950 64 The Road Transport Corporations Act, […]

You May Like

  • A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
  • A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]

Jurisprudence

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: