Skip to content

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Legal Database

United States Code

  • Title 1. General Provisions
  • Title 2. The Congress
  • Title 3. The President
  • Title 4. Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States
  • Title 5. Government Organization and Employees
  • Title 6. Domestic Security
  • Title 7. Agriculture
  • Title 8. Aliens and Nationality
  • Title 9. Arbitration
  • Title 10. Armed Forces
  • Title 11. Bankruptcy
  • Title 12. Banks and Banking
  • Title 13. Census
  • Title 14. Coast Guard
  • Title 15. Commerce and Trade
  • Title 16. Conservation
  • Title 17. Copyrights
  • Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure
  • Title 19. Customs Duties
  • Title 20. Education
  • Title 21. Food and Drugs
  • Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse
  • Title 23. Highways
  • Title 24. Hospitals and Asylums
  • Title 25. Indians
  • Title 26. Internal Revenue Code
  • Title 27. Intoxicating Liquors
  • Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
  • Title 29. Labor
  • Title 30. Mineral Lands and Mining
  • Title 31. Money and Finance
  • Title 32. National Guard
  • Title 33. Navigation and Navigable Waters
  • Title 35. Patents
  • Title 36. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations
  • Title 37. Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services
  • Title 38. Veterans' Benefits
  • Title 39. Postal Service
  • Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works
  • Title 41. Public Contracts
  • Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare
  • Title 43. Public Lands
  • Title 44. Public Printing and Documents
  • Title 45. Railroads
  • Title 46. Shipping
  • Title 47. Telecommunications
  • Title 48. Territories and Insular Possessions
  • Title 49. Transportation
  • Title 50. War and National Defense
  • Title 51. National and Commercial Space Programs
  • Title 52. Voting and Elections
  • Title 54. National Park Service and Related Programs

Read More

  • Home
    • About
  • UPDATES
  • Courts
  • Constitutions
  • Law Exam
  • Pleading
  • Indian Law
  • Notifications
  • Glossary
  • Account
  • Home
  • 2020
  • September
  • 11
  • ‘UPSC Jihad’ to be aired on Friday 11 Sept: Govt allowed Sudarshan TV
  • News

‘UPSC Jihad’ to be aired on Friday 11 Sept: Govt allowed Sudarshan TV

two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing a similar plea with the same allegation had refused to put a stay on the same show on Sudarshan channel. This facts was overlooked by the Delhi High Court.  The ruling of Apex court is binding on the Govt of India.
2 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on Wednesday allowed the Sudarshan News channel to broadcast a show on  the “infiltration of Muslims in the Civil Services” after following the Broadcasting rules.

Date:11/09/2020

There is no pre-censorship of any programme telecast on TV channels

The ministry of information and broadcasting allowed the Sudarshan TV to air their programme on the “infiltration of Muslims in the Civil Services” after receiving representation from the Channel owner.

Earlier the Delhi High Court had restrained Sudarshan TV from telecasting its programme titled ‘Bindas Bol’,  on-air at 8 PM on August 28, whose promo claimed that the channel was all set to broadcast a ‘big expose on conspiracy to infiltrate Muslims in government service’. The plea in High Court was filed through advocate Shadan Farasat which argued that the TV channel’s editor-in-chief Suresh Chavhanke openly indulged in hate speech in the promo against Jamia Milia Islamia students and Muslim community.

But a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing a similar plea with the same allegation had refused to put a stay on the same show on Sudarshan channel. This fact was overlooked by the Delhi High Court.  The ruling of Apex court is binding on the Govt of India.

The Government has directed Sudarshan channel to ensure that the show to be telecasted should not violate any programme code. 

On behalf of Sudarshan News channel following Tweets have been posted.

नौकरशाही जिहाद
Suresh Chavhanke “Sudarshan News” Retweeted
Madhu Purnima Kishwar
@madhukishwar
·
Big relief that attempts to censor
@SureshChavhanke
have failed for the time being.
But they won’t give up so easily.
Quote Tweet

Suresh Chavhanke “Sudarshan News”
@SureshChavhanke
· 19h
सत्यमेव जयते Flexed biceps
#HighCourt ने सुदर्शन पर लगाए प्रतिबंध पर हिन्दुस्थान सरकार की राय माँगी थी, सरकार ने प्रसारण से पूर्व रोक लगाने से मना किया है

#SupremeCourt का पहले ही यह निर्णय था. अब शुक्रवार 8pm #नौकरशाही_जिहाद #UPSCJihad पर एतिहासिक #BindasBol होगा

Read the Govt Order dated 9th Sept 2020

 

order-sudarshanDownload

Related

Tags: featured Jihad

Continue Reading

Previous: Scrapping of Art 370 has removed political and legal obstacles of development: Naqvi
Next: Yoga helping rapid recovery of COVID patients: Govt in RS

Indian Supreme Court Digest

  • Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
  • For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
  • ISKCON leaders, engage themselves into frivolous litigations and use court proceedings as a platform to settle their personal scores-(SC-18/05/2023)
  • High Court would not interfere by a Revision against a decree or order u/s 6 of SRA if there is no exceptional case (SC-2/4/2004)
  • Borrower may file a counterclaim either before DRT in a proceeding filed by Bank under RDB Act or a Civil Suit under CPC-SC (10/11/2022)

Write A Guest Post

Current Posts

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
15 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Supreme Court Judgments

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)
198 min read
  • Indian Parliament

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)

  • DATABASE
  • INDEX
  • JUDGMENTS
  • CONTACT US
  • DISCLAIMERS
  • RSS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCOUNT
Copyright by Advocatetanmoy.
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.