Effect of non-examination of all prosecution witnesses -explain

Effect of non-examination of all prosecution witnesses


The matter of examination of witnesses is within the discretion of counsel for prosecution—The Court while taking into consideration the fact of absence of witness should consider the prosecution case as a whole on the basis of available evidence while keeping in view the criticism about absence of witnesses.

The observations of Lord Porter in …..’Malak Khan vs. Emperor, ‘ AIR 1946 PC 16, furnish a good answer on the point. The learned Lord observed as follows: “It is no doubt very important that, as a general rule, all Crown witnesses should be called to testify at the hearing of a prosecution, but important as it is, there is no obligation compelling counsel for the prosecution to call all witnesses who speak to facts which the Crown desire to prove. Ultimately it is a matter for the discretion of counsel for the prosecution and though a Court ought, and no doubt will, take into consideration the absence of witnesses whose testimony would be expected, it must adjudge the evidence as a whole and arrive at its conclusion accordingly taking into consideration the persuasiveness of the testimony given in the light of such criticism as may be levelled at the absence of possible witnesses.” [AIR 1954 SC 31 : (1954) CriLJ SC 323]

Next Post

Commissions for examination of witnesses should not be allowed ordinarily in criminal cases

Sun Nov 1 , 2020
Dharmanand Pant  Versus  State of U.P -Witnesses in a criminal case should not be examined on commission except in extreme cases of delay, expense or inconvenience and in particular the procedure by way of interrogatories should be resorted in unavoidable situations. AIR 1957 SC 594 : (1957) SCR 321 : (1957) CriLJ SC 894 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Dharmanand Pant  […]

You May Like

Recent Updates

%d bloggers like this: