CIVIL

What is biological life

Life is a multi-faceted concept with no simple definition; this article is confined to the primary meanings in biology; articles on life in other senses are included in the article life (disambiguation).

Defining the concept of life

Life has a number of senses with a biological meaning

  • “life” may refer to the ongoing process of which living things are a part;
  • “life” may refer to the period between birth and death of an organism;
  • “life” may refer to the state of something that has been born and has yet to die, i.e., that which makes a living thing alive;

The remainder of this section focuses on the last biological sense — how can one tell when an entity is a living thing?

It would be relatively straightforward to offer a practical set of guidelines if one’s only concern were life on Earth as we know it (see biosphere), but as soon as one considers questions about life’s originss on Earth, or the possibility of extraterrestrial life, or the concept of artificial life, it becomes clear that the question is fundamentally difficult and comparable in many respects to the problem of defining intelligence.

A conventional definition

In biology, an entity has traditionally been considered to be alive if it exhibits all the following phenomena at least once during its existence:

  1. Growth
  2. Metabolism, consuming, transforming and storing energy/mass; growing by absorbing and reorganizing mass; excreting waste
  3. Motion, either moving itself, or having internal motion
  4. Reproduction, the ability to create entities that are similar to itself
  5. Response to stimuli – the ability to measure properties of its surrounding environment, and act upon certain conditions.

These criteria are not without their uses, but their disparate nature makes them unsatisfactory from a number of perspectives; in fact, it is not difficult to find counterexamples and examples that require further elaboration. For example, according to the above definition, one could say:

  • fire is alive. (This could be remedied by adding the requirement of locality, where there is an obvious feature that delineates the spatial extension of the living being, such as a cell membrane.)
  • male mules are not alive as they are sterile and cannot reproduce.
  • viruses are not alive as they do not grow and cannot reproduce outside of a host cell.

Biologists who are content to focus on terrestrial organisms often note some additional signs of a “living organism”, including these:

  1. Living organisms contain molecular components such as: carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins.
  2. Living organisms require both energy and matter in order to continue living.
  3. Living organisms are composed of at least one cell.
  4. Living organisms maintain homeostasis.
  5. Species of living organisms will evolve.

All life on Earth is based on the chemistry of carbon compounds. Some assert that this must be the case for all possible forms of life throughout the universe; others describe this position as ‘carbon chauvinism’.

Other definitions

Other definitions include:

  • Francisco Varela and Humberto Maturana’s definition of life (also widely used by Lynn Margulis) as an autopoietic (self-producing), water based, lipid-protein bound, carbon metabolic, nucleic acid replicated, protein readout system
  • “a system of inferior negative feedbacks subordinated to a superior positive feedback” (J. theor Biol. 2001)
  • Tom Kinch’s definition of life as a highly organized auto-cannibalizing system naturally emerging from conditions common on planetary bodies, and consisting of a population of replicators capable of mutation, around each set of which a homeostatic metabolizing organism, which actively helps reproduce and/or protect the replicator(s), has evolved
  • Stuart Kauffman’s definition of life as an autonomous agent or a multi-agent system capable of reproducing itself or themselves, and of completing at least one thermodynamic work cycle
  • Robert Pirsig’s definition of life, found in his book , as that which maximizes its range of possible futures, in other words, that which makes decisions that result in the most future choices, or that which strives to keep its options open.

Descent with modification: a “useful” characteristic

A useful characteristic upon which to base a definition of life is that of descent with modification: the ability of a life form to produce offspring that are like its parent or parents, but with the possibility of some variation due to chance. Descent with modification is sufficient by itself to allow evolution, assuming that the variations in the offspring allow for differential survival. The study of this form of heritability is called genetics. In all known life forms (assuming prions are not counted as such), the genetic material is primarily DNA or the related molecule, RNA. Another exception might be the software code of certain forms of viruses and programs created through genetic programming, but whether computer programs can be alive even by this definition is still a matter of some contention.

Exceptions to the common definition

Note that many individual organisms are incapable of reproduction and yet are still generally considered to be “alive”; see mules and ants for examples. However, these exceptions can be accounted for by applying the definition of life on the level of entire species or of individual genes. (For example, see kin selection for information about one way by which non-reproducing individuals can still enhance the spread of their genes and the survival of their species.)

Viruses reproduce, flames grow, some software programs mutate and evolve, future software programs will probably evince (even high-order) behavior, machines move, and proto-life, consisting of metabolizing cells without reproduction apparatus, can have existed. Still, some would not call these entities alive. Generally, all five characteristics are required for a population to be considered alive.

Origin of life

There is no truly “standard” model of the origin of life, however most currently accepted models build in one way or another upon the following discoveries, which are listed in a rough order of postulated emergence:

  1. Plausible pre-biotic conditions result in the creation of the basic small molecules of life. This was demonstrated in the Urey-Miller experiment.
  2. Phospholipids spontaneously form lipid bilayers, the basic structure of a cell membrane.
  3. Procedures for producing random RNA molecules can produce “ribozymes”, which are able to produce more of themselves under very specific conditions.

There are many different hypotheses regarding the path that might have been taken from simple organic molecules to protocells and metabolism. Many of the possibilities have tended to fall into either “genes-first” or “metabolism-first”; a recent trend is the emergence of hybrid models that combine aspects of both.

The possibility of extraterrestrial life

As of 2004, Earth is the only planet in the universe known by humans to support life. The question of whether life exists elsewhere in the universe remains open, but analyses such as the Drake equation have been used to estimate the probability of such life existing. There have been a number of false alarms of life elsewhere in the universe, but none of these apparent discoveries have so far survived scientific scrutiny.

Today, the closest that scientists have come to finding extraterrestrial life is fossil evidence of possible bacteriall life on Mars (via the ALH84001 meteorite). Searches for extraterrestrial life are currently focusing on planets and moons believed to possess liquid water, at present or in the past. Recent evidence from the NASA rovers Spirit and Opportunity supports the theory that Mars once had surface water.

Jupiter’s moons are also considered good candidates for extraterrestrial life, especially Europa, which seems to possess oceans of liquid water.


 

Categories: CIVIL

Tagged as: ,