For the month of January 2021
| 1 | Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-000026 / 2020 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | MANISH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIAIndia Bharat Varsha (Jambu Dvipa) is the name of this land mass. The people of this land are Sanatan Dharmin and they always defeated invaders. Indra (10000 yrs) was the oldest deified King of this land. Manu's jurisprudence enlitened this land. Vedas have been the civilizational literature of this land. Guiding principles of this land are : सत्यं वद । धर्मं चर । स्वाध्यायान्मा प्रमदः । Read more | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| JudgmentJudgment The statement given by the Judge on the grounds of a decree or order - CPC 2(9). It contains a concise statement of the case, points for determination, the decision thereon, and the reasons for such decision - Order 20 Rule 4(2). Section 354 of CrPC requires that every judgment shall contain points for determination, the decision thereon and the reasons for the decision. Indian Supreme Court Decisions > Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts (Art 141 Indian Constitution) Civil and judicial authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court (Art 144) Supreme Court Network On Judiciary – Portal > Denning: “Judges do not speak, as do actors, to please. They do not speak, as do advocates, to persuade. They do not speak, as do historians, to recount the past. They speak to give Judgment. And in their judgments, you will find passages, which are worthy to rank with the greatest literature….” Law Points on Judgment Writing > The judge must write to provide an easy-to-understand analysis of the issues of law and fact which arise for decision. Judgments are primarily meant for those whose cases are decided by judges (State Bank of India and Another Vs Ajay Kumar Sood SC 2022) By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | ||
| 2 | Case Number | R.P.(C) No.-000472 / 2018 | 22-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ANJALI BRAHMAWAR CHAUHAN | ||
| Respondent Name | NAVIN CHAUHAN | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RICHA KAPOOR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | ||
| 3 | Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-000114-000114 / 2014 | 06-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | COMMON CAUSE | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PRASHANT BHUSHAN | ||
| Bench | |||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | ||
| 4 | Case Number | C.A. No.-007469-007469 / 2008 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | M/S. PADIA TIMBER CO. P. LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST THROUGH ITS SECRETARY | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DEVASHISH BHARUKA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | GOPAL SINGH | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | ||
| 5 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000022-000023 / 2021 | 08-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | MIHIR GOPE ETC. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF JHARKHAND | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KAUSHIK LAIK | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| 6 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000006-000006 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | RAMJAN ALI | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | Robin Khokhar | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 7 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000012-000012 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | RAJEEV SURI | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHIV KUMAR SURI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR | ||
| 8 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000024-000024 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | MURALI | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE REP BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | K. PAARI VENDHAN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA | ||
| 9 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000013-000013 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | THE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNING BODY DAULAT RAM COLLEGE | ||
| Respondent Name | DR. ASHA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SATYA MITRA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 10 | Case Number | C.A. No.-004035-004037 / 2020 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | ||
| Respondent Name | PANDARINATHAN GOVINDARAJULU | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANTOSH KUMAR – I | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| 11 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001256-001256 / 2017 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | HARI OM @ HERO | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE OF U.P. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SHANKAR DIVATE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT | ||
| 12 | Case Number | C.A. No.-002760-002760 / 2010 | 22-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | INDIAN BANK | ||
| Respondent Name | MAHAVEER KHARIWAL | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | MADHU SIKRI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 13 | Case Number | CONMT.PET.(C) No.-000092-000092 / 2008 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | RAMA NARANG | ||
| Respondent Name | RAMESH NARANG | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ABHINAV MUKERJI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | LAWYER S KNIT & CO | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR | ||
| 14 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000142-000142 / 2021 | 20-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | ||
| Respondent Name | SURESHWATI | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RAJIV NANDA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| 15 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000094-000094 / 2021 | 13-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD | ||
| Respondent Name | ABDUL SALAM SARKAR (DEAD) | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M. YOGESH KANNA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | ||
| 16 | Case Number | C.A. No.-001322-001323 / 2019 | 13-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | M/S. VELLANKI FRAME WORKS | ||
| Respondent Name | COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | |||
| Respondent’s Advocate | GUNTUR PRABHAKAR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | ||
| 17 | Case Number | C.A. No.-005189-005192 / 2017 | 18-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS ETC.ETC. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PURNIMA BHAT | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| 18 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000039-000039 / 2021 | 13-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | S. SUNDARA KUMAR | ||
| Respondent Name | STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M.P. Parthiban | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 19 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000019-000020 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | KIRTI | ||
| Respondent Name | ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | MRITUNJAY KUMAR SINHA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA | ||
| 20 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-001919-001919 / 2010 | 12-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ANVERSINH @ KIRANSINH FATESINH ZALA | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF GUJARAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | NARESH KUMAR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT | ||
| 21 | Case Number | C.A. No.-005231-005232 / 2016 | 12-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | HIMACHAL PRADESH BUS STAND MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HPBSMDA) | ||
| Respondent Name | THE CENTRAL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | ||
| 22 | Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-001039 / 2020 | 13-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | DIPIKA JAGATRAM SAHANI | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SATYA MITRA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 23 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000251-000252 / 2021 | 28-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ASSAM INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONCorporation A legally established entity that can enter into contracts, own assets and incur debt, as well as sue and be sued—all separately from its owner(s). The term covers both for-profit and nonprofit corporations and includes nonstock corporations, incorporated membership organizations, incorporated cooperatives, incorporated trade associations, professional corporations and, under certain circumstances, limited liability companies. LTD | ||
| Respondent Name | GILLAPUKRI TEA COMPANY LIMITED | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | KAUSTUBH SHUKLA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER | ||
| 24 | Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-001107 / 2020 | 20-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | IN RE: ADVOCATE ON RECORD INCLUDES A PROPRIETARY FIRM ETC. | ||
| Respondent Name | |||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | BY COURTS MOTION | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| 25 | Case Number | C.A. No.-003974-003975 / 2020 | 11-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA | ||
| Respondent Name | RESHMA A. AND ORS. ETC. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD | ||
| 26 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000029-000029 / 2021 | 12-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ASHARAM TIWARI | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DEVVRAT | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA | ||
| 27 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000268-000269 / 2021 | 29-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | POORAN CHAND | ||
| Respondent Name | CHANCELLOR | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M/S PRATAP AND CO. | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 28 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000047-000048 / 2021 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | LAKHVIR SINGH ETC. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF PUNJAB | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANIRUDH SANGANERIA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| 29 | Case Number | C.A. No.-005785 / 2019 | 11-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | ABHISHEK KHANNA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | E. C. AGRAWALA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| 30 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000131-000131 / 2021 | 20-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJAY KUMAR VISEN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| 31 | Case Number | C.A. No.-003802-003803 / 2020 | 11-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | M/S N.N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED | ||
| Respondent Name | M/S INDO UNIQUE FLAME LTD. | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL | ||
| Bench | |||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| 32 | Case Number | C.A. No.-009546-009546 / 2013 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | VENIGALLA KOTESWARAMMA | ||
| Respondent Name | MALEMPATI SURYAMBA . | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | ANIL KUMAR TANDALE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI | ||
| 33 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000155-000155 / 2021 | 28-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | CHINTPURNI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL | ||
| Respondent Name | UNION OF INDIA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | LAWYER S KNIT & CO | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO | ||
| 34 | Case Number | C.A. No.-007343-007350 / 2019 | 12-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | THE MAVILAYI SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. | ||
| Respondent Name | COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ANKUR S. KULKARNI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN | ||
| 35 | Case Number | T.P.(C) No.-002344 / 2019 | 29-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | AMRUTA BEN HIMANSHU KUMAR SHAH | ||
| Respondent Name | HIMANSHU KUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA SHAH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | DIKSHA RAI | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | Taruna Singh Gohil | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| 36 | Case Number | C.A. No.-006209-006209 / 2010 | 19-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | BAJRANGA (DEAD) BY LRS. | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PRATIBHA JAIN | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL | ||
| 37 | Case Number | SLP(C) No.-026484 / 2018 | 22-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | ANKITA MEENA | ||
| Respondent Name | UNIVERSITY OF DELHI | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | ASHISH VIRMANI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | ||
| 38 | Case Number | Crl.A. No.-000088-000088 / 2021 | 29-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | AJAY KUMAR @ BITTU | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 39 | Case Number | C.A. No.-014665-014665 / 2015 | 06-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | BHAVEN CONSTRUCTION | ||
| Respondent Name | EXE ENGINEER SARDAR SAROVAR NARMADA NIGAM | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | HEMANTIKA WAHI | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA | ||
| 40 | Case Number | MA-002673 / 2019 | 22-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | DARSHAN SINGH | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF PUNJAB SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | Vanshdeep Dalmia | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE | ||
| 41 | Case Number | W.P.(C) No.-001352 / 2019 | 20-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | MS. X | ||
| Respondent Name | THE STATE OF JHARKHAND | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | PETITIONER-IN-PERSON | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN | ||
| 42 | Case Number | C.A. No.-000017-000018 / 2021 | 05-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) | ||
| Respondent Name | AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | SANJAY KAPUR | ||
| Respondent’s Advocate | |||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN | ||
| 43 | Case Number | R.P.(C) No.-000065 / 2021 | 11-01-2021 |
| Petitioner Name | BEGHAR FOUNDATION | ||
| Respondent Name | JUSTICE K.S.PUTTASWAMY(RETD) | ||
| Petitioner’s Advocate | M. T. GEORGE | ||
| Bench | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER, HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI | ||
| Judgment By | HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR |
More Stories
Supreme Court Direction in Rajesh vs Neha and Anrs (04/11/2020)
Judges cannot create a hate speech law and seek to enforce it-Supreme Court (2014)
Law Clerk-cum-Research Associates in the Supreme Court of India,remuneration Rs.80,000/- age 30yrs (01/04/2023)