Skip to content

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Legal Database

United States Code

  • Title 1. General Provisions
  • Title 2. The Congress
  • Title 3. The President
  • Title 4. Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States
  • Title 5. Government Organization and Employees
  • Title 6. Domestic Security
  • Title 7. Agriculture
  • Title 8. Aliens and Nationality
  • Title 9. Arbitration
  • Title 10. Armed Forces
  • Title 11. Bankruptcy
  • Title 12. Banks and Banking
  • Title 13. Census
  • Title 14. Coast Guard
  • Title 15. Commerce and Trade
  • Title 16. Conservation
  • Title 17. Copyrights
  • Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure
  • Title 19. Customs Duties
  • Title 20. Education
  • Title 21. Food and Drugs
  • Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse
  • Title 23. Highways
  • Title 24. Hospitals and Asylums
  • Title 25. Indians
  • Title 26. Internal Revenue Code
  • Title 27. Intoxicating Liquors
  • Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
  • Title 29. Labor
  • Title 30. Mineral Lands and Mining
  • Title 31. Money and Finance
  • Title 32. National Guard
  • Title 33. Navigation and Navigable Waters
  • Title 35. Patents
  • Title 36. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations
  • Title 37. Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services
  • Title 38. Veterans' Benefits
  • Title 39. Postal Service
  • Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works
  • Title 41. Public Contracts
  • Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare
  • Title 43. Public Lands
  • Title 44. Public Printing and Documents
  • Title 45. Railroads
  • Title 46. Shipping
  • Title 47. Telecommunications
  • Title 48. Territories and Insular Possessions
  • Title 49. Transportation
  • Title 50. War and National Defense
  • Title 51. National and Commercial Space Programs
  • Title 52. Voting and Elections
  • Title 54. National Park Service and Related Programs

Read More

  • Home
    • About
  • UPDATES
  • Courts
  • Constitutions
  • Law Exam
  • Pleading
  • Indian Law
  • Notifications
  • Glossary
  • Account
  • Home
  • 2021
  • March
  • 11
  • Caveat and Caveat Emptor
  • CIVIL

Caveat and Caveat Emptor

in law, a notice served on a public officer or court to refrain from doing a certain act without first giving notice to the caveator, as the person is termed who enters the caveat. Perhaps the best known use of the caveat in the United States is its entry by an inventor in the Patent Office for the purpose of establishing his claim to priority of invention, by enjoining its officers from issuing letters patent for any invention interfering with or infringing the rights claimed by the caveator without first giving him notice of the application for such letters patent.
3 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

CAVEAT, kā’vē-ăt (Lat. “let him beware”), in law, a notice served on a public officer or court to refrain from doing a certain act without first giving notice to the caveator, as the person is termed who enters the caveat. Perhaps the best known use of the caveat in the United States is its entry by an inventor in the Patent Office for the purpose of establishing his claim to priority of invention, by enjoining its officers from issuing letters patent for any invention interfering with or infringing the rights claimed by the caveator without first giving him notice of the application for such letters patent. The terms of the caveat must set forth the claims of the inventor and the details of his invention with sufficient particularity to enable the officials of the Patent Office to determine whether a subsequent application for letters falls within the claims of the first inventor. If such is the case the caveator is entitled to notice of such interfering application, and the new applicant’s claim to letters is suspended for three months, during which period the caveator must complete his specifications and file his own application for letters patent. If no interfering application is filed, the caveator’s rights remain valid for one year, and may be renewed at the end of that term, for one year more, on payment of a second fee.

The law providing for the filing of caveats was repealed by Congress in 1910. Other uses of the caveat are to prohibit (without notice to the caveator) the admission of a will to probate, the enrolment of a decree in chancery, the grant of letters testamentary to an executor, the issuing of a commission de lunatico inquirendo, etc On the filing of such a caveat and due notice being served thereunder, a hearing is had before a competent tribunal for the determination of the rights in the matter. (See Patents). Consult ‘Rules of United States Patent Office’; Merwin, ‘Patentability of Inventions’ (Boston 1883); Luby, ‘Patent Office Practice’ (Kalamazoo 1897).

CAVEAT, kä’vē-ät, EMPTOR (Lat. “let the buyer beware”), a rule of law that warns the purchaser to take care and examine property before he buys it. In sales of real estate the purchaser’s right to relief depends on the covenants in the deed in the absence of fraud on the part of the vendor. In 1 Serg. & R. 42, the rule is stated as follows:

“The rule of caveat emptor strictly applies to the purchase of lands, and the consideration-money cannot be recovered back after a deed executed, unless in case of fraud, where some covenant inserted in the deed has been broken. The purchaser has it in his power to protect himself by proper covenants, and there is no reason why the law should provide to him a remedy, where he himself has been wholly inattentive and negligent in this particular.”

In sales of personal property the purchaser buys at his own risk, in the absence of an express warranty by the seller, or when the law does not imply a warranty from the circumstances of the sale or the nature of the thing sold, and when the seller was not guilty of a fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment. The purchaser must examine the quality of the goods bought and rely upon his own judgment. Generally, if the article purchased is defective, and an examination, such as a reasonable and prudent man would make, would enable him to see the defect, it is not a fraud on the part of the seller not to call his attention to it.

At common law in the city of London, the law of market overt applied to all stores where articles in that particular line were sold. The purchaser got a good title, but as to the quality the purchaser must examine and judge for himself.


SOURCE: The Encyclopedia Americana – Caveat 1920

Related

Tags: Dictionary

Continue Reading

Previous: Of God-Pliny the Elder
Next: Nature of Examination under Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Indian Supreme Court Digest

  • Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
  • For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
  • ISKCON leaders, engage themselves into frivolous litigations and use court proceedings as a platform to settle their personal scores-(SC-18/05/2023)
  • High Court would not interfere by a Revision against a decree or order u/s 6 of SRA if there is no exceptional case (SC-2/4/2004)
  • Borrower may file a counterclaim either before DRT in a proceeding filed by Bank under RDB Act or a Civil Suit under CPC-SC (10/11/2022)

Write A Guest Post

Current Posts

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
15 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Supreme Court Judgments

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)
198 min read
  • Indian Parliament

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)

  • DATABASE
  • INDEX
  • JUDGMENTS
  • CONTACT US
  • DISCLAIMERS
  • RSS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCOUNT
Copyright by Advocatetanmoy.