MCQs-Code of Civil Procedure-Objective Questions for Judicial/UPSC/BAR/NET Exm

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Preliminary

1. Introduction

2. Definitions

Suits

1. Jurisdiction of Civil Courts

2. Res Sub Judice and Res Judicata

3. Foreign Judgment

4. Place of Suing

5. Institutions of Suit

6. Pleadings

7. Plaint and Written Statement

8. Appearance and Non-appearance of Parties

9. First Hearing

10. Discovery, Inspection and Production of Documents

11. Interim Orders

12. Withdrawal and Compromise of Suits

13. Death, Marriage and Insolvency of Parties

14. Trial

15. Judgment and Decree

16. Rejection of Plaint

17. Suit before District Court

18. Original Suit before High Court

19. Original Suit before Supreme Court

Special Suits

Suit by/Against Government
Suit by/against Minor or Incapacitated Person
Suit by/against Corporation
Suit by/against Foreign Entity or Nationals
Suit for Partition
Suit for Declaration
Suit Connected with Mortgage

Appeals, Reference, Review and Revision

1. General

2. First Appeals

3. Second Appeals

4. Appeals from Orders

5. Appeals by Indigent Persons

6. Appeals to Supreme Court

7. Reference

8. Review

9. Revision

Execution

1. Execution in General

2. Courts Which May Execute Decrees

3. Application for Execution

4. Stay of Execution

5. Mode of Execution

6. Arrest and Detention

7. Attachment of Property

8. Questions to be Determined by Executing Court

9. Adjudication of Claims

10. Sale of Property

11. Delivery of Property

12. Distribution of Assets

Miscellaneous

1. Transfer of Cases

2. Restitution

3. Caveat

4. Inherent Powers of Courts

5. Delay in Civil Litigation

Miscellaneous

Commercial Courts
Plaint
Written Statement
Issues
First Appeal
Second Appeal
Appeal against order
Revision
Evidence
Injunction Application
Violation of Injunction Order
Affidavit
Cost
Caveat

Code of Civil Procedure(MCQs)Objective question-2nd Set

More MCQs

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Manoj Pratap Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan-24/06/2022

DEATH PENALTY CONFIRMED-Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed; conviction of the appellant of offences under Sections 363, 365, 376(2)(f), 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is confirmed; and the sentences awarded to the appellant, including the death sentence for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, are also confirmed.

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI VS STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR-24/06/2022

FURTHER INVESTIGATION-No fault can be found with the approach of the SIT in submitting final report , which is backed by firm logic, expositing analytical mind and dealing with all aspects objectively for discarding the allegations regarding larger criminal conspiracy (at the highest level) for causing and precipitating mass violence across the State against the muslim community.

Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala-24/06/2022

SENTENCE REDUCED- Accused(A1) was charge-sheeted for offence U/S 55(g) and 8(1) read with 8(2) of the Abkari Act and was convicted for the aforestated offences and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/each

Krishna Rai (D) through LRS. & Ors. Vs. Banaras Hindu University through Registrar & Ors-16/06/2022

Whether principle of estoppel and acquiescence will prevail over statutory service rules prescribing the procedure for promotion of ClassIV employees to ClassIII working in the Banaras Hindu University(BHU)

Swaminathan Kunchu Acharya Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors-09/06/2022

Habeas corpus – the writ petition seeking writ of habeas corpus for production of corpus – Pranav Acharya aged 5 years

Vallal Rck Vs. M/s. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. and Ors-03/06/2022

Apex Court has, time and again, emphasized the need for minimal judicial interference by the NCLAT and NCLT in the framework of IBC

Mahendra Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Madya Pradesh-03/06/2022

It is a sound and well established rule of law that the court is concerned with the quality and not with the quantity of the evidence necessary for proving or disproving a fact.

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. A. Balakrishnan & Anr (30/05/2022)

Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016-the application under Section 7 of the IBC was filed within a period of three years from the date on which the Recovery Certificate was issued. As such, the application under Section 7 of the IBC was within limitation.