Skip to content

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Legal Database

United States Code

  • Title 1. General Provisions
  • Title 2. The Congress
  • Title 3. The President
  • Title 4. Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States
  • Title 5. Government Organization and Employees
  • Title 6. Domestic Security
  • Title 7. Agriculture
  • Title 8. Aliens and Nationality
  • Title 9. Arbitration
  • Title 10. Armed Forces
  • Title 11. Bankruptcy
  • Title 12. Banks and Banking
  • Title 13. Census
  • Title 14. Coast Guard
  • Title 15. Commerce and Trade
  • Title 16. Conservation
  • Title 17. Copyrights
  • Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure
  • Title 19. Customs Duties
  • Title 20. Education
  • Title 21. Food and Drugs
  • Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse
  • Title 23. Highways
  • Title 24. Hospitals and Asylums
  • Title 25. Indians
  • Title 26. Internal Revenue Code
  • Title 27. Intoxicating Liquors
  • Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
  • Title 29. Labor
  • Title 30. Mineral Lands and Mining
  • Title 31. Money and Finance
  • Title 32. National Guard
  • Title 33. Navigation and Navigable Waters
  • Title 35. Patents
  • Title 36. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations
  • Title 37. Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services
  • Title 38. Veterans' Benefits
  • Title 39. Postal Service
  • Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works
  • Title 41. Public Contracts
  • Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare
  • Title 43. Public Lands
  • Title 44. Public Printing and Documents
  • Title 45. Railroads
  • Title 46. Shipping
  • Title 47. Telecommunications
  • Title 48. Territories and Insular Possessions
  • Title 49. Transportation
  • Title 50. War and National Defense
  • Title 51. National and Commercial Space Programs
  • Title 52. Voting and Elections
  • Title 54. National Park Service and Related Programs

Read More

  • Home
    • About
  • UPDATES
  • Courts
  • Constitutions
  • Law Exam
  • Pleading
  • Indian Law
  • Notifications
  • Glossary
  • Account
  • Home
  • 2021
  • November
  • 1
  • Legislation Opposed by the U.S Fraternal Order Of Police
  • USA

Legislation Opposed by the U.S Fraternal Order Of Police

2 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

LEGISLATION OPPOSED BY THE FOP IN THE 115TH CONGRESS

  • H.R. 387 (Yoder, R-KS), the “Email Privacy Act,” would make it more difficult for law enforcement to collect and obtain electronic evidence;
  • H.R. 622 (Chaffetz, R-UT), the “Local Law Enforcement for Local Lands Act,” would terminate the law enforcement functions of the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management;
  • H.R. 785 (King, R-IA), the “Right to Work Act,” would limit and further erode the rights of employees to negotiate with their employer over wages, hours and working conditions;
  • H.R. 1180 (Roby, R-AL), the “Working Families Flexibility Act,” would allow employers in the private sector to replace overtime with compensatory time off;
  • H.R. 1364 (Hice, R-GA), the “Official Time Reform Act,” would arbitrarily cap the amount of time that can be used per day for official time duties without any consideration for the needs and requirements of the agency;
  • H.R. 1498 (Conyers, D-MI), the “End Racial Profiling Act,” which would define “racial profiling” as any consideration of race, national origin or ethnic origin to initiate a traffic stop or vehicle search–absent an eyewitness description–and requires the collection of race and other data by State and local law enforcement during routine investigatory activities;
  • H.R. 1979 (Jackson-Lee, D-TX), the “No More Tulias: Drug Law Enforcement Evidentiary Standards Improvement Act,” which would significantly limit States who fund anti-drug task forces from receiving Federal funding from the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice Assistant Grants program;
  • H.R. 3003, Section 2 (Goodlatte, R-VA), the “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act,” which would penalize law enforcement agencies by withholding Federal funding from so-called “sanctuary cities”;
  • H.R. 5682 as introduced (Collins, R-GA), the “Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person (FIRST STEP) Act,” which may result in the premature release of thousands of convicted offenders;
  • S. 446 (Cornyn, R-TX), the “Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act,” which would allow any civilian concealed carry permit holder to travel to any other State issuing concealed carry permits without any training or safety requirements;
  • S. 748 (Menendez, D-NJ), the “Protecting the Rights of Families and Immigrants Who Legally Entered From Detention (PROFILED) Act,” which would define “racial profiling” as any consideration of race, national origin or ethnic origin to initiate a traffic stop or vehicle search, absent an eyewitness description, and requires the collection of race and other data by State and local law enforcement during routine investigatory activities;
  • Legislation that would impose any tax, direct or indirect, on any employer-sponsored health coverage;
  • Legislation which would weaken the overtime protections for law enforcement officers in current Federal regulations;
  • Legislation or amendments that would have the effect of weakening PL 106-185, the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000;
  • Legislation which would create or fund “civilian review boards” of law enforcement at any level of government; and
  • Legislation which would further normalize relations with Cuba until that nation ceases to be a safe harbor for cop-killers and other fugitives.

Source: FOP

Related

Tags: POLICE

Continue Reading

Previous: White House Meetings with Leaders of Law Enforcement Groups on Police Reform
Next: FOP President Patrick Yoe’s letter in support of “Violent Incident Clearance and Technological Investigative Methods Act.”

Indian Supreme Court Digest

  • Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
  • For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
  • ISKCON leaders, engage themselves into frivolous litigations and use court proceedings as a platform to settle their personal scores-(SC-18/05/2023)
  • High Court would not interfere by a Revision against a decree or order u/s 6 of SRA if there is no exceptional case (SC-2/4/2004)
  • Borrower may file a counterclaim either before DRT in a proceeding filed by Bank under RDB Act or a Civil Suit under CPC-SC (10/11/2022)

Write A Guest Post

Current Posts

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
15 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Supreme Court Judgments

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)
198 min read
  • Indian Parliament

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)

  • DATABASE
  • INDEX
  • JUDGMENTS
  • CONTACT US
  • DISCLAIMERS
  • RSS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCOUNT
Copyright by Advocatetanmoy.