Skip to content

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Legal Database

United States Code

  • Title 1. General Provisions
  • Title 2. The Congress
  • Title 3. The President
  • Title 4. Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States
  • Title 5. Government Organization and Employees
  • Title 6. Domestic Security
  • Title 7. Agriculture
  • Title 8. Aliens and Nationality
  • Title 9. Arbitration
  • Title 10. Armed Forces
  • Title 11. Bankruptcy
  • Title 12. Banks and Banking
  • Title 13. Census
  • Title 14. Coast Guard
  • Title 15. Commerce and Trade
  • Title 16. Conservation
  • Title 17. Copyrights
  • Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure
  • Title 19. Customs Duties
  • Title 20. Education
  • Title 21. Food and Drugs
  • Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse
  • Title 23. Highways
  • Title 24. Hospitals and Asylums
  • Title 25. Indians
  • Title 26. Internal Revenue Code
  • Title 27. Intoxicating Liquors
  • Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
  • Title 29. Labor
  • Title 30. Mineral Lands and Mining
  • Title 31. Money and Finance
  • Title 32. National Guard
  • Title 33. Navigation and Navigable Waters
  • Title 35. Patents
  • Title 36. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations
  • Title 37. Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services
  • Title 38. Veterans' Benefits
  • Title 39. Postal Service
  • Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works
  • Title 41. Public Contracts
  • Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare
  • Title 43. Public Lands
  • Title 44. Public Printing and Documents
  • Title 45. Railroads
  • Title 46. Shipping
  • Title 47. Telecommunications
  • Title 48. Territories and Insular Possessions
  • Title 49. Transportation
  • Title 50. War and National Defense
  • Title 51. National and Commercial Space Programs
  • Title 52. Voting and Elections
  • Title 54. National Park Service and Related Programs

Read More

  • Home
    • About
  • UPDATES
  • Courts
  • Constitutions
  • Law Exam
  • Pleading
  • Indian Law
  • Notifications
  • Glossary
  • Account
  • Home
  • 2021
  • November
  • 18
  • Shri Jimmy Sympli Vs. State of Meghalaya
  • Criminal

Shri Jimmy Sympli Vs. State of Meghalaya

the petitioner has not filed any application under Section 451 CrPC for release of vehicle on Zimma. The revision petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to approach the trial Magistrate for release of vehicle under Section 451 CrPC, who shall pass appropriate order thereon keeping in view the legal proposition noticed hereinbefore in accordance with law.
2 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

High Court of Meghalaya

SINGLE BENCH: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal

Crl.Ref. No. 1 of 2019 with
Crl.Rev.P.No. 17 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 18 of 2019
Crl.Petn. No. 19 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 21 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 22 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 23 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 24 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 25 of 2019
Crl.Rev.P. No. 27 of 2019

arising out of Nongstoin PS Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Case No. 30(3)2019
Shri Jimmy Sympli Vs. State of Meghalaya
Shri Marjan Lytan & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya
Shri Pramod Sharma Vs. State of Meghalaya
Shri Raju Singh Vs. State of Meghalaya
Smt. Dropadi Saraf Agarwal Vs. State of Meghalaya
Balateilang L. Nonglait Vs. State of Meghalaya & anr
Shri Bishit Suchiang Vs. State of Meghalaya
Shri Sudip Paul Vs. State of Meghalaya
Smti Sangita Agarwala Vs. State of Meghalaya

Decided on: 12.07.2019

Zimma Application – Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure – Sections
188/420/120 B/109 IPC – Section 451 CrPC – Section 50(1)(c) CrPC – In view of the discussion the
court arrived at the conclusion, the said Circular dated 31.01.2019 shall be ineffective while adjudicating
petition under Section 451 CrPC by the Judicial Magistrate/Criminal Court where the trial Magistrate
shall afford an opportunity to the claimant-petitioner to prima facie establish his claim of innocence
and non-involvement in the commission of the offence/crime – Consequently, the petitions are allowed
and the impugned orders declining Zimma applications are set aside. The matters are remanded back to
the trial Magistrate/Criminal Court to pass fresh order keeping in view the principles and guidelines
enunciated above in accordance with law – Criminal Reference No.1 of 2019 also stand answered in the
above terms. In Crl.Petn.No.19 of 2019, the petitioner has not filed any application under Section 451
CrPC for release of vehicle on Zimma. The revision petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to
approach the trial Magistrate for release of vehicle under Section 451 CrPC, who shall pass appropriate
order thereon keeping in view the legal proposition noticed hereinbefore in accordance with law.


Related

Tags: LEGAL BRIEF MEHGALAYA HIGH COURT

Continue Reading

Previous: Assize of Clarendon – Henry II – 1166
Next: Sri Lankan Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment)Act, No. 14 of 2021

Indian Supreme Court Digest

  • Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
  • For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
  • ISKCON leaders, engage themselves into frivolous litigations and use court proceedings as a platform to settle their personal scores-(SC-18/05/2023)
  • High Court would not interfere by a Revision against a decree or order u/s 6 of SRA if there is no exceptional case (SC-2/4/2004)
  • Borrower may file a counterclaim either before DRT in a proceeding filed by Bank under RDB Act or a Civil Suit under CPC-SC (10/11/2022)

Write A Guest Post

Current Posts

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
15 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Supreme Court Judgments

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)
198 min read
  • Indian Parliament

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)

  • DATABASE
  • INDEX
  • JUDGMENTS
  • CONTACT US
  • DISCLAIMERS
  • RSS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCOUNT
Copyright by Advocatetanmoy.