Skip to content

Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Legal Database

United States Code

  • Title 1. General Provisions
  • Title 2. The Congress
  • Title 3. The President
  • Title 4. Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States
  • Title 5. Government Organization and Employees
  • Title 6. Domestic Security
  • Title 7. Agriculture
  • Title 8. Aliens and Nationality
  • Title 9. Arbitration
  • Title 10. Armed Forces
  • Title 11. Bankruptcy
  • Title 12. Banks and Banking
  • Title 13. Census
  • Title 14. Coast Guard
  • Title 15. Commerce and Trade
  • Title 16. Conservation
  • Title 17. Copyrights
  • Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure
  • Title 19. Customs Duties
  • Title 20. Education
  • Title 21. Food and Drugs
  • Title 22. Foreign Relations and Intercourse
  • Title 23. Highways
  • Title 24. Hospitals and Asylums
  • Title 25. Indians
  • Title 26. Internal Revenue Code
  • Title 27. Intoxicating Liquors
  • Title 28. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
  • Title 29. Labor
  • Title 30. Mineral Lands and Mining
  • Title 31. Money and Finance
  • Title 32. National Guard
  • Title 33. Navigation and Navigable Waters
  • Title 35. Patents
  • Title 36. Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations
  • Title 37. Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services
  • Title 38. Veterans' Benefits
  • Title 39. Postal Service
  • Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works
  • Title 41. Public Contracts
  • Title 42. The Public Health and Welfare
  • Title 43. Public Lands
  • Title 44. Public Printing and Documents
  • Title 45. Railroads
  • Title 46. Shipping
  • Title 47. Telecommunications
  • Title 48. Territories and Insular Possessions
  • Title 49. Transportation
  • Title 50. War and National Defense
  • Title 51. National and Commercial Space Programs
  • Title 52. Voting and Elections
  • Title 54. National Park Service and Related Programs

Read More

  • Home
    • About
  • UPDATES
  • Courts
  • Constitutions
  • Law Exam
  • Pleading
  • Indian Law
  • Notifications
  • Glossary
  • Account
  • Home
  • 2022
  • January
  • 18
  • India and China both deployed around 50,000 to 60,000 troops along the high-altitude line of actual control-11/01/2022
  • Military

India and China both deployed around 50,000 to 60,000 troops along the high-altitude line of actual control-11/01/2022

Thus it was distracting at best and disruptive at worst for India to point an accusing finger at China just prior to the latest talks for what it called Chinese infrastructure construction in areas under "illegal occupation by China". Such a move will not gain more bargaining power for New Delhi at the negotiation table, since these projects are in territory that are entirely under China's sovereignty. Instead it will only create unnecessary trouble and hamper efforts to reach consensus.
2 min read
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

With the previous round of talks in October having failed to achieve any agreement, due to New Delhi’s “unreasonable and unrealistic demands”, the latest round of discussions between China and India has attracted a lot of attention.

How the two sides approach the 14th round of talks at the corps commander level which commenced on Wednesday will have a direct bearing not only on bilateral relations, but also regional peace and stability.

That the border situation is generally stable at the moment and the two countries’ front-line troops have disengaged at many points of friction makes it possible for the two countries to take the opportunity to ease tensions along their disputed border. After all, a continuous military standoff, with each side deploying around 50,000 to 60,000 troops along the high-altitude line of actual control, especially in harsh winter conditions, serves neither country any good. Rather, it would be in their common interests if they could switch from “emergency response to normalized management and control in the border area as soon as possible”, as a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said.

For that to happen, it is of the utmost importance for the two sides to first focus on the most pressing problem at the moment, which is the disengagement of troops from any remaining points of friction as that will help defuse tensions. The trust gained can then serve to facilitate the settlement of more thorny issues in talks to be held in the days to come.

Thus it was distracting at best and disruptive at worst for India to point an accusing finger at China just prior to the latest talks for what it called Chinese infrastructure construction in areas under “illegal occupation by China”. Such a move will not gain more bargaining power for New Delhi at the negotiation table, since these projects are in territory that are entirely under China’s sovereignty. Instead it will only create unnecessary trouble and hamper efforts to reach consensus.

Adding to the difficulties for the two sides to achieve progress in the talks is interference from the United States, which is trying hard to drive a wedge between China and India. Responding to a question on the India-China border dispute during a press briefing on JANUARY 10, 2022, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki described China as a threat to regional security with its “Well, we continue to closely monitor the situation, and we continue to support dialogue and peaceful resolution of these border disputes. We’ve been pretty clear how we view Beijing’s behavior in the region and around the world. We believe it can be destabilizing. And we’re concerned by the PRC’s attempt to intimidate its neighbors.  We’ll continue to stand with our partners on that.”

Source:  Modified from China Daily


Related

Tags: 2022 Border China Indo-China LEGAL

Continue Reading

Previous: Statement on the Nuclear Tests of Pakistan and India-28/05/1998
Next: Defense Policy of China-2009

Indian Supreme Court Digest

  • Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
  • For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
  • ISKCON leaders, engage themselves into frivolous litigations and use court proceedings as a platform to settle their personal scores-(SC-18/05/2023)
  • High Court would not interfere by a Revision against a decree or order u/s 6 of SRA if there is no exceptional case (SC-2/4/2004)
  • Borrower may file a counterclaim either before DRT in a proceeding filed by Bank under RDB Act or a Civil Suit under CPC-SC (10/11/2022)

Write A Guest Post

Current Posts

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)
15 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

Unexplained inordinate delay must be taken into consideration as a very crucial factor and ground for quashing a criminal complaint (SC-18/05/2023)

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Criminal Procedure Code 1973

For passing order u/s 319 CrPC, ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in para no106 of Hardeep Singh case is sufficient (SC-2/06/2023)

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)
8 min read
  • Supreme Court Judgments

Ghanshyam Vs Yogendra Rathi (02/06/2023)

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)
198 min read
  • Indian Parliament

Indian Lok Sabha Debates on The Railways Budget 2014-15 (10/06/2014)

  • DATABASE
  • INDEX
  • JUDGMENTS
  • CONTACT US
  • DISCLAIMERS
  • RSS
  • PRIVACY
  • ACCOUNT
Copyright by Advocatetanmoy.