Working Format of The Constitutional Court of Armenia-2018
WORKING FORMAT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Adopted by the Procedural Decision PDCC-1-N of 9 July 2018
The Working Format of the Constitutional Court shall be adopted pursuant to the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court with a view to regulating the issues prescribed by this Law, as well as internal procedures aimed at ensuring the smooth activity of the Constitutional Court.
1. According to Part 8 of Article 62 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, the Working Format of the Constitutional Court (hereinafter referred to as the Working Format) is adopted, and the amendments and supplements thereto shall be adopted by the procedural decision of the Constitutional Court rendered by at least two thirds of votes of the total number of judges of the Constitutional Court.
2. Any judge of the Constitutional Court is in the position to propose amendments or supplements to the Working Format.
4. In Clause 2 of this Working Format the proponent, within 10 days, having summed up the opinions specified in Clause 3 of this Working Format, submits the draft of procedural decision of the Constitutional Court on making amendments or supplements of the Working Format to the President of the Constitutional Court for the consideration.
6. Election of the President and the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court shall be held at a procedural session of the Constitutional Court convened for this purpose.
7. According to Part 4 of Article 19 and Part 2 of Article 20 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, elections of the President or the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court shall be held within ten days following the opening of the position of the President or the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court.
8. Nomination and self-nomination of candidates for the position of the President and the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court shall be conducted orally.
9. Candidates for the position of President and the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court may recuse themselves.
10. Nomination, self-nomination and recusal of candidates shall be recorded.
11. Election of the President or the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court shall be held by secret ballot at a procedural session of the Constitutional Court, which is entitled if the number of judges of the Constitutional Court required for the election of the President or the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court are present at the session pursuant to the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court.
12. The sample of the ballots is established by Annex 1 to this Working Format.
13. Ballots shall be drafted and printed / issued by the Staff of the Constitutional Court (hereinafter referred to as the Staff).
14. Ballots shall be prepared in an amount equal to the number of judges attending the session.
15. During the election of the President or the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court, the judge of the Constitutional Court shall make a V-shaped mark in the box opposite the name of the candidate whom s/he is voting for. If there is only one candidate, the judge of the Constitutional Court, when voting for this candidate, make a V-shaped mark opposite the word “for”, and when voting against this candidate make a mark opposite the word “against”.
16. Voting shall be organized by the President of the Constitutional Court, who sums up the voting results in the presence of the judges attending the session, and in case of the election of the President of the Constitutional Court is held, then the judge replacing him/her.
17. If, during the election of the President of the Constitutional Court or his/her deputy, the nominated candidate or one of the nominated candidates does not receive the most votes deemed to have been elected, then in accordance with Part 2 of Article 19 and Part 4 of Article 20 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court”, a second round is held within five days between the two candidates who have received the most votes in the first round.
18. If, due to the equality of votes, more than two candidates received the most votes, then voting is cast on between all candidates who received the highest number of votes till the two candidates who received the highest number of votes for election in the second round.
19. According to Part 2 of Article 19 and Part 4 of Article 20 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court”, the candidate who receives the majority of votes from the total number of votes of the judges of the Constitutional Court is considered elected according to the results of the second round of elections.
20. If the President of the Constitutional Court is not elected, then new elections are held after voting in the second round – not earlier than 10 days and not later than 30 days. If the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court is not elected, then new elections are held after voting in the second round – not earlier than 10 days and not later than 90 days.
21. If the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court is not elected, then new elections are held after voting in the second round – not earlier than 10 days and not later than 90 days.
22. The results of voting shall be recorded.
23. The date of the new elections shall be determined and notified by the President of the Constitutional Court at least 10 days before the elections, in case of his/her absence – by the Deputy President of the Constitutional Court or an acting judge-in-charge of the Constitutional Court temporarily performating his/her powers.
24. In case of absence of the grounds prescribed by Parts 3 and 4 of Article 26 of this Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, preliminary examination of the application shall be conducted by one of the judges of the Constitutional Court assigned by the President of the Constitutional Court.
25. For the purpose of preliminary study of applications, the President of the Constitutional Court distributes it among the judges of the Constitutional Court, taking into account the principle of equal workload of judges.
26. The judge of the Constitutional Court conducting the preliminary examination of the application, if necessary, receives consultation from the competent division of the Staff on the grounds for accepting the application for consideration, which is provided, as a rule, no later than 3 days before the expiration of the period established for the preliminary examination of the application.
27. After the registration of the application the preliminary examination of the application shall be completed no later than:
28. A procedural decision of the Constitutional Court may establish other terms for the preliminary examination of the application.
29. In order to extend the terms of the preliminary examination of the application before the expiration of the established period, the judge of the Constitutional Court conducting the preliminary examination of the application shall file a motion to the President of the Constitutional Court to extend the period for the preliminary examination of the application. When deciding to extend the time period for the preliminary examination of the application, the President of the Constitutional Court shall take into account the time period provided for by the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court” for the consideration of the case.
(edited by the Decision PDCC-47 of 28 February 2020)
30. The judge of the Constitutional Court conducting the preliminary examination of the application, based on the results of the preliminary examination of the application, prepares a report on compliance with the requirements for accepting the case for examination prescribed by the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court.
31. After receiving the report on the issue of compliance with the requirements for accepting the case for examination, the President of the Constitutional Court, within a reasonable time, shall convene a procedural session of the Constitutional Court for deciding the issue of accepting the case for examination.
(edited by the Decision PDCC-47 of 28 February 2020)
32. In the course of preparing the case for trial, the competent division of the Staff shall compile a proceeding, which includes:
33. Participants in the proceeding and attendees shall be notified of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court by a note by the Chief of Staff.
34. Participants in the trial and attendees may, with their written consent, be notified of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court by other means of notification, in particular by fax, e-mail, by means of an electronic message, by telegram.
35. Legal entities shall be notified in accordance with the procedure prescribed by Article 10 of the Law on public and individual notification via the Internet.
36. A notice of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court shall be sent to the participants in the trial and attendees within 5 days from the date of entry into force of the procedural decision on the date and time of the session.
37. In the cases prescribed by Parts 1 of Articles 81 and 86 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, a notice of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court shall be sent to the participants in the trial and attendees within 24 hours from the date of entry into force of the procedural decision on the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court.
38. In the cases prescribed by Part 1 of Article 81 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, a notice of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court shall be sent to the participants in the trial and attendees within 12 hours from the date of entry into force of the procedural decision on the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court.
40. The rapporteur shall be entitled to send a letter/circular with questions to the parties in accordance with the procedure established by law, and set limits for responding to those questions.
41. In the cases prescribed by the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court may Format a working group to clarify specific circumstances of the case.
42. The working group shall submit its positions on certain circumstances of the case and the materials acquired to the judges of the Constitutional Court in written Format within the period prescribed by the procedural decision of the Constitutional Court.
43. At the beginning of the session of the Constitutional Court, at the appointed time, the secretary of the court announces: “All Rise.”, those present at the invitation of the presiding judge at the session take their places.
45. Prior to the opening of the session, the secretary of the court notifies the Constitutional Court of the presence at the session of the participants in the trial and attendees, as well as of the persons who did not appear at the session of the Constitutional Court, and also provides information on the reasons for their absence.
46. According to Part 6 of Article 49 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, the trial of the case starts with the report of the rapporteur, which, in particular, includes a brief description of the case, as well as information on the availability of the necessary documents in the case.
47. The rapporteur shall send a draft decision on the merits or an opinion of the Constitutional Court on a certain case to the President of the Constitutional Court and other judges of the Constitutional Court from the moment the case is assigned to the rapporteur and within the period prescribed by sub-clauses 1-7 of this clause if, by a procedural decision of the Constitutional Court or at the request of the rapporteur, no other period has been established by the President of the Constitutional Court within the period prescribed by the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court for the examination of a certain case:
(supplemented by the Decision PDCC-47 of 28 February 2020)
48. Prior to the submission of a draft decision on the merits or an opinion of the Constitutional Court, the rapporteur is entitled to submit to the President of the Constitutional Court his/her initial position on the issue, after which the President of the Constitutional Court is entitled to convene, if necessary, a procedural session in order to clarify the initial position of other judges of the Constitutional Court.
49. If the position of the majority of the judges of the Constitutional Court differs significantly from the position of the rapporteur, who declares his/her intention to present a dissenting opinion, the rapporteur may be replaced by a judge of the Constitutional Court representing the position of the majority. In this case, a procedural decision of the Constitutional Court establishes the period for submitting a new draft decision on the merits or an opinion.
50. Where the situation referred to in Clause 49 of this Working Format arises during the closed-door court deliberation, a procedural decision on replacement of the rapporteur may be adopted during this closed-door court deliberation, which shall be interrupted for a period necessary for the formulation of a new draft on the merits or the opinion, as prescribed by a procedural decision specified in this Clause.
51. The sequence and duration of the explanations to be submitted by the parties to the trial may be established by a procedural decision of the Constitutional Court.
52. If an expert is invited – after being warned by the presiding judge about the legal liability provided for knowingly delivering false opinion – through the secretary of the court, he shall sign a statement with the following content: “I, (name, surname, place of work, academic degree (if any), undertake to provide an impartial opinion in my conviction and in accordance with my professional knowledge. I have been warned by the presiding judge that, in accordance with Part 3 of Article 53 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, knowingly providing false opinion shall entail liability prescribed by law”.
53. The statement signed by the exper and supported by his/her opinion, shall be attached to the court case.
54. Where necessary, the Constitutional Court may additionally invite the expert, who provided the opinion, to the court session.
55. If a witness is invited to a session of the Constitutional Court, the presiding judge shall, through the court secretary, establish the identity of the witness, i.e. name, surname, date and place of birth, place of residence and place of work.
56. Prior to giving testimony, the witness, after being warned by the presiding judge about the liability provided for by law for giving deliberately false testimony and refusing to give testimony – through the secretary of the court, shall sign a statement with the following content: “I, (name, surname), undertake to disclose the Constitutional Court of every fact known to me subject to clarification in the case under consideration. I have been warned by the presiding judge that, in accordance with Part 3 of Article 55 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, giving deliberately false testimony or refusing to give testimony entail liability prescribed by law”.
57. The statement signed by the witness shall be attached to the case.
58. A procedural decision on the adjournment in the course of a session of the Constitutional Court may be issued at the proposition of one of the judges of the Constitutional Court, as well as upon the motion of a party to the trial (his representative). A proposal or motion for the adjournment shall be discussed without delay.
59. At the end of the session of the Constitutional Court, the parties have the right to present closing arguments.
60. The sequence and duration for presenting closing arguments shall be established by a procedural decision of the Constitutional Court. Taking into account the opinion of the parties or the judges of the Constitutional Court, the Constitutional Court is empowered to limit the duration for presenting arguments.
61. During the presentation of closing arguments, the parties are not authorized to refer to circumstances not examined during the trial.
62. In case of a dissenting opinion, the presiding judge informats about it during the announcement of the decision or opinion.
63. Where the trial of cases is conducted through the written procedure, the parties shall submit their explanations, motions, proposals and objections to the Constitutional Court in writing within 30 days after their notification of the date and time of the session of the Constitutional Court unless another term is specified by the procedural decision of the Constitutional Court.
64. Prior to the examination of the case through the written procedure, the additional materials on the case acquired by the Constitutional Court, subsequent to their arrival, shall be provided through the Staff to the judges of the Constitutional Court and to the parties.
65. The examination of the case according to the written procedure begins with the verification of the legality of the session by the presiding judge. If the session is legally qualified, the Constitutional Court immediately proceeds to a closed session.
66. At any stage of the examination of the case through the written procedure, the Constitutional Court may issue a procedural decision to proceed the hearing in the oral procedure, if there are grounds specified in the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court, except for the cases prescribed by Articles 71 and 86 of the Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court.
67. The judges of the Constitutional Court and the parties to the proceedings have the right to submit a motion to the Constitutional Court for proceeding the examination of the case through the oral procedure.
68. Prior to the commencement of the trial, the decision to proceed the examination through the oral procedure shall be issued at a procedural session of the Constitutional Court, and the parties and the invited shall be notified of the decision in due procedure.
69. The parties should be notified of proceeding to the examination through oral procedure at least 5 days prior to the session of the Constitutional Court, and in urgent cases – without delay.
70. The parties to the trial shall be notified of the place and time of the announcement of the decision of the Constitutional Court by the Staff.
71. The remainder of the rules prescribed in Chapter 6 of this Working Format with regard to written proceedings shall apply mutatis mutandis.
72. Individual applications submitted to the Constitutional Court shall be logged in the register of individual applications by the authorized subdivision of the Staff.
73. The procedure for maintaining the register shall be established by the Chief of the Staff.
84. The applicant is considered to have been notified of the need to bring the individual application in line with the requirements of Articles 24 and 25 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court” or on its return from the moment of his/her notification by means of the appropriate e-mail or postal service.
85. The preliminary examination of an individual application, in the case of absence of the ncessity to bring the individual appeal in line with the requirements of Articles 24 and 25 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court” or proceeding the sent individual application in line with the requirements of Articles 24 and 25 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court” or the adoption of the decision by the judicial composition as a result of the application against the returned individual application to accept the application, shall be carried out by the judicial composition formated in the manner prescribed by this Chapter.
appeal or refusing to consider it.
(amended by the Decision PDCC-47 of 28 February 2020)
114. Procedural decisions of the Constitutional Court shall be adopted both in procedural sessions of the Constitutional Court and in sessions of the Constitutional Court – at the stage of the legal proceeding.
128. The Constitutional Court may, upon the proposal of the judges of the Constitutional Court or upon the application of the participants in the proceeding of a case, correct errors, spelling and digital errors in the decisions and opinions of the Constitutional Court without changing the content and essence of the decision or opinion of the Constitutional Court.
131. The sessions of the Constitutional Court (including procedural sessions) are recorded by means of a special computer audio recording system, which is installed in the session hall of the Constitutional Court and the deliberation room.
148. Any correspondence submitted to the Constitutional Court as a written document which is not constituted as an application within the meaning of the Constitution and the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court” is considered as correspondence (hereinafter – correspondence) .
(amended by the Decision PDCC-47 of 28 February 2020)
154. Judges of the Constitutional Court are granted regular annual paid leave by the President of the Constitutional Court.
158. In order to ensure the normal functioning of the Constitutional Court, a judge of the Constitutional Court notifies the President of the Constitutional Court of any position or performance of any paid work specified in Parts 3 and 8 of Article 4 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court”.
159. The occupation of a position or performance of any other paid work specified in clause 158 of this Working Format should not interfere with the exercise of the powers of a judge of the Constitutional Court and is not a valid reason for absence from the sessions of the Constitutional Court.
160. The President of the Constitutional Court, prior to submission to the Government of the cost estimate of the Constitutional Court, shall convene a procedural session of the Constitutional Court, at which the Chief of Staff submits the estimate of the costs of the Constitutional Court.
161. At the procedural session, the estimate of the costs of the Constitutional Court is taken into account, taking into account the proposals made by the judges of the Constitutional Court regarding the estimate.
181. In accordance with part 1 of Article 21 of the Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court”, the Constitutional Court Formats the Staff independently, in the manner prescribed by law and these Regulations.