What we shall know at the first instant : In the healthy condition of man, the spiritual vital force (autocracy), the dynamis that animates the material body (organism), rules with unbounded sway, and retains all the parts of the organism in admirable, harmonious, vital operation, as regards both sensations and functions, so that our indwelling,… Read More The knowledge of all Subjects and Categories
Law Library Shorter Penal Code Advance knowledge of Penal Coding The design of enacting this Code is to define in plain language every offense against the laws of this state, and affix to each offense its proper punishment. The object of punishment is to suppress crime and reform the offender. An offense is an act or omission forbidden… Read More Advance knowledge of Penal Coding
MANU SAMHITA CHAPTER TWO VERSE 109 TO 115 109. According to the sacred law the (following) ten (persons, viz.) the teacher’s son, one who desires to do service, one who imparts knowledge, one who is intent on fulfilling the law, one who is pure, a person connected by marriage or friendship, one who possesses (mental)… Read More Who is competent for acquiring knowledge
Traditional Knowledge Digital Library The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) was established in the year 2001. The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) is a collaborative project between the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the Department of AYUSH. The same is a home-grown effort to ensure patent offices around the world do not… Read More Traditional Knowledge Digital Library [Govt of India]
pramana — means of valid knowledge; prameya — objects of valid knowledge; samshaya — doubt; prayojana — purpose; drstanta – example; siddhanta — conclusion; avayava — the constituents of a syllogism or factors of Inference; tarka — argumentation; nirnaya — ascertainment; vada — debate; jalpa — disputations; vitanda — destructive criticism; hetvabhasa — fallacy; chala — quibble; jāti — refutations; and nigrahasthana — points of the opponent’s defea
In depth knowledge of Expert Evidence … Read More Expert Evidence
CHAPTER I Organisation 1. Interpretations. [§ 12, Act V, 1861]. – In these Regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, – (i) the word “Superintendent” means Superintendent of Police and includes a Special Superintendent, an Additional Superintendent and any officer, not below the rank of Inspector, temporarily discharging the duties of… Read More Police Regulations, Bengal – 1943
It must be borne in mind that Consumer Protection Act, 1986 lays down its own period of limitation.
… Read More Praying condonation of delay before Consumer commission u/s 12(2) of Limitation Act
RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY 1978 1 PREAMBLE* The Court, Having regard to Chapter XIV of the Charter of the United Nations; Having regard to the Statute of the Court annexed thereto; Acting in pursuance of Article 30 of the Statute; Adopts the following Rules.
Supreme court dismissed the writ petition U/a 32, now the High court shall not entertain a petition U/A 226 of the Constitution.
After dismissal of the writ petition by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the petitioner has not filed any review petition. It was open to the petitioner to file review and in case of its dismissal a curative petition. He has failed to point out as to why the same was not done. At his juncture, we may clarify that before Hon’ble Apex Court Annexure P-14 (which is annexure No. 1 to the instant writ petition), the order passed by respondent No. 2 dated 23.10.2004 was challenged. In the given circumstances, we find that neither review was filed nor any curative petition was filed nor it is stated before this Court that any such petition is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Accordingly, finality is to be attached to the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 11.4.2005. Even at this stage, the petitioner has not pressed before this Court that he is inclined to file such petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Consequently, we have to proceed with the matter with the assumption that the order passed by Hon’ble Apex Court has become final as the same has not so far been challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.… Read More DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Vs. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [ALL HC 2007 ALLAHABAD]
A number of judgments have been cited including the celebrated Supreme Court judgment in Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Another, 1998 (4) SCC 409, in which a Constitution Bench of this Court held that Article 142 cannot authorize the Court to ignore the substantive rights of a litigant while dealing with the cause pending before it and cannot be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the cause before this Court. A large number of other judgments following this judgment were also cited. … Read More STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]
The Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013, in Section 357C Cr.PC says that both private and
public health professionals are obligated to provide treatment. Denial of treatment of rape survivors is punishable under Section 166 B IPC with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both… Read More Sexual violence and Medico-legal evidence
06-12-1989-N.D.P.S. Act is a special Act dealing with special class of crimes which is an international menace. Therefore the Legislature in its wisdom has enacted certain special provisions affecting the powers of the Trial Court in matter of granting bail. The cases are tribal by the Special Courts created u/s 36 of the Act. Although… Read More Granting bail under NDPS Act
Published vide No. F.12(6) Home-1/2007, G.S.R. 30 dated 23.5.2008 (Published in Rajasthan Gazette Extraordinary dated 26.5.2008). 1. Short title and commencement. – (1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Police Rules, 2008. (2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. Definition. – (1) In these… Read More Rajasthan Police Rules, 2008