Traditional Knowledge Digital Library [Govt of India]

Traditional Knowledge Digital Library  The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) was established in the year 2001.  The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) is a collaborative project between the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the Department of AYUSH. The same is a home-grown effort to ensure patent offices around the world do not… Read More Traditional Knowledge Digital Library [Govt of India]

Sixteen Means of knowledge by Naya Sutra of Goutama -[Arument]

pramana — means of valid knowledge; prameya — objects of valid knowledge; samshaya — doubt; prayojana — purpose; drstanta – example; siddhanta — conclusion; avayava — the constituents of a syllogism or factors of Inference; tarka — argumentation; nirnaya — ascertainment; vada — debate; jalpa — disputations; vitanda — destructive criticism; hetvabhasa — fallacy; chala — quibble; jāti — refutations; and nigrahasthana — points of the opponent’s defea

Police Regulations, Bengal – 1943

  CHAPTER I Organisation 1. Interpretations. [§ 12, Act V, 1861]. – In these Regulations, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, – (i) the word “Superintendent” means Superintendent of Police and includes a Special Superintendent, an Additional Superintendent and any officer, not below the rank of Inspector, temporarily discharging the duties of… Read More Police Regulations, Bengal – 1943

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Vs. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [ALL HC 2007 ALLAHABAD]

Supreme court dismissed the writ petition U/a 32, now the High court shall not entertain  a petition U/A 226 of the Constitution.

After dismissal of the writ petition by the Hon’ble Apex Court, the petitioner has not filed any review petition. It was open to the petitioner to file review and in case of its dismissal a curative petition. He has failed to point out as to why the same was not done. At his juncture, we may clarify that before Hon’ble Apex Court Annexure P-14 (which is annexure No. 1 to the instant writ petition), the order passed by respondent No. 2 dated 23.10.2004 was challenged. In the given circumstances, we find that neither review was filed nor any curative petition was filed nor it is stated before this Court that any such petition is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Accordingly, finality is to be attached to the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 11.4.2005. Even at this stage, the petitioner has not pressed before this Court that he is inclined to file such petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Consequently, we have to proceed with the matter with the assumption that the order passed by Hon’ble Apex Court has become final as the same has not so far been challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.… Read More DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY Vs. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [ALL HC 2007 ALLAHABAD]

STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

A number of judgments have been cited including the celebrated Supreme Court judgment in Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Another, 1998 (4) SCC 409, in which a Constitution Bench of this Court held that Article 142 cannot authorize the Court to ignore the substantive rights of a litigant while dealing with the cause pending before it and cannot be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the cause before this Court. A large number of other judgments following this judgment were also cited. … Read More STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

Rajasthan Police Rules, 2008

Published vide No. F.12(6) Home-1/2007, G.S.R. 30 dated 23.5.2008 (Published in Rajasthan Gazette Extraordinary dated 26.5.2008). 1. Short title and commencement. – (1) These rules may be called the Rajasthan Police Rules, 2008. (2) They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the Official Gazette. 2. Definition. – (1) In these… Read More Rajasthan Police Rules, 2008