Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri Vs. The Union of India & Ors [ SC 1950 December]

KEYWORDS : Fundamental right of  company-eminent domain- HELD : No one except those whose rights are directly affected by a law can raise the question of the constitutionality of that law. The company and the shareholders are in law separate entities, and if the allegation is made that any property belonging to the company has … Continue reading Chiranjit Lal Chowdhuri Vs. The Union of India & Ors [ SC 1950 December]

Mahasay Ganesh Prasad Ray and anothers Vs Narendra Nath Sen and others [SC 1950 December]

The payment of court-fees is a matter primarily between the Government and the  respondents AIR 1953 SC 431 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Mahasay Ganesh Prasad Ray and anothers Appellant Versus Narendra Nath Sen and others Respondent (Before : M. H. Kania, C.J.I., M. Patanjali Sastri And S. R. Das, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 106 of … Continue reading Mahasay Ganesh Prasad Ray and anothers Vs Narendra Nath Sen and others [SC 1950 December]

H. P. Singh Vs Thakur Prasad Tewari an another [SC 1950 December]

Keywords : Ignorance of contempt  order Notice   AIR 1953 SC 436 : (1953) CriLJ SC 1837 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) H. P. Singh Appellant Versus Thakur Prasad Tewari an another Respondent (Before : Saiyid Fazl Ali, B. K. Mukherjea And N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No.18 of 1950. (Privy Council Appeal No. 29 … Continue reading H. P. Singh Vs Thakur Prasad Tewari an another [SC 1950 December]

Charanjit Lal Chowdhury Versus The Union of India and others[SC 1950 December]

Challenging a Legislation To make out a case under this Article, it is incumbent upon the petitioner to establish not merely that the law complained of is beyond the competence of the particular Legislature as not being covered by any of the items in the legislative lists, but that it affects or invades his fundamental … Continue reading Charanjit Lal Chowdhury Versus The Union of India and others[SC 1950 December]

The State of Tripura Versus The Province of East Bengal[ SC 1950 December]

Thus tort is a civil injury other than a breach of contract which is capable of sustaining an action for unliquidated damages in a Court of law. If the appropriate remedy is not a claim for unliquidated damages but for injunction or some other relief, it would not rank as a tort though all the … Continue reading The State of Tripura Versus The Province of East Bengal[ SC 1950 December]

Janardhan Reddy and others Versus The State OF Hyderabad[SC 1950 December]

AIR 1951 SC 124 : (1950) SCR 940 : (1951) CriLJ SC 391 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Janardhan Reddy and others Appellant Versus The State OF Hyderabad Respondent (Before : M. H. Kania, C.J.I., Saiyid Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, B. K. Mukherjea, S. R. Das And N. Chandrasekhara Aiyar, JJ.) Criminal Misc. Petn. Nos. … Continue reading Janardhan Reddy and others Versus The State OF Hyderabad[SC 1950 December]

Sarju Pershad Ramdeo Sahu Versus Jwaleshwari Pratap Narain Singh and others[SC 1950 November]

1950- AIR 1951 SC 120 : (1950) SCR 781 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sarju Pershad Ramdeo Sahu Appellant Versus Jwaleshwari Pratap Narain Singh and others Respondent (Before : Saiyid Fazl Ali, Mehr Chand Mahajan And B. K. Mukherjea, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 70 of 1949, Decided on :   14-11-1950. Counsel for the Parties: Shri … Continue reading Sarju Pershad Ramdeo Sahu Versus Jwaleshwari Pratap Narain Singh and others[SC 1950 November]

Chintamanrao and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh[SC 1950 November]

Keywords : The phrase “reasonable restriction” connotes that the limitation imposed on a person in enjoyment of the right should not be arbitrary or of an excessive nature, beyond what is required in the interests of the public. The word “reasonable” implies intelligent care and deliberation, that is the choice of a course which reason … Continue reading Chintamanrao and another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh[SC 1950 November]

Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal Versus Keshab Chandra Mandal[SC 1950]

AIR 1950 SC 265 : (1950) SCR 435 : (1950) 18 ITR SC 569 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal Appellant Versus Keshab Chandra Mandal Respondent (Before : Saiyid Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri, Mehr Chand Mahajan, B. K. Mukherjea And S. R. Das, JJ.) Appeal No. 88 of 1949, Decided … Continue reading Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax, West Bengal Versus Keshab Chandra Mandal[SC 1950]

A. K. Gopalan Versus State of Madras [SC 1950 May]

keywords : Keywords-Due process of Law-Procedure established by Law⇔ Under our Constitution, our life and personal liberty are balanced by restrictions on the rights of the citizens as laid down in Art. 19 and by the checks put upon the State by Arts. 21 and 22. The first is that in U. S. A. Constitution … Continue reading A. K. Gopalan Versus State of Madras [SC 1950 May]

Brij Bhusan and another Versus The State of Delhi[SC 1950 May ]

KeyWorsd:-Pre-censorship-Public Order-Freedom of Press⇔ Imposition of pre-censorship on a journal is a restriction on the liberty of the press which is an essential part of the right to freedom of speech and expression declared by Art.19 (1) (a) AIR 1950 SC 129 : (1950) SCR 605 : (1950) CriLJ SC 1525 : (1950) SCJ 425 … Continue reading Brij Bhusan and another Versus The State of Delhi[SC 1950 May ]

Romesh Thappar Versus The State of Madras[SC 1950 May]

KEYWORDS:-Sedition-Criticism to Government-Public Tranquility-Public Safety⇔ Supreme Court is the protector and guarantor of fundamental rights In other words cl.(2) of Art. 19 having allowed the imposition of restriction on the freedom of speech and expression only in cases where danger to public security is involved, an enactment, which is capable of being applied to cases … Continue reading Romesh Thappar Versus The State of Madras[SC 1950 May]

A. K. Gopalan vs State of Madras [ALL SC 1950 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-PREVENTIVE DETENTION- DATE :- 19-05-1950 A preventive detention law which provides some procedure and complies with the requirements of Art. 22 (4) to (7) must be held to be a good law. As to the meaning of the work ‘law’ it was argued that it meant principles of natural justice. It meant “jus,” i. e., law … Continue reading A. K. Gopalan vs State of Madras [ALL SC 1950 MAY]

Shankari Prasad Singh Deo and others Versus The Union of India and others [SC 1950 October]

“A law which contravenes the constitution constitutionally valid is a matter of constitutional amendment, and it falls within the exclusive power of Parliament” AIR 1951 SC 458 : (1952) SCR 89 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Shankari Prasad Singh Deo and others Appellant Versus The Union of India and others Respondent (Before : M. H. Kania, … Continue reading Shankari Prasad Singh Deo and others Versus The Union of India and others [SC 1950 October]

THE CONSTITUTION (SCHEDULED CASTES) ORDER, 1950

(C.O.19)  In  exercise  of the powers conferred by clause (1) of article 341  of the  Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Governors  and Rajpramukhs of the States concerned, is pleased to make the following Order, namely:-  This Order may be called the Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950. Subject  to  the provisions of this Order, the castes,  races  or tribes  or  parts of, or groups within, castes … Continue reading THE CONSTITUTION (SCHEDULED CASTES) ORDER, 1950

V. VR. N. M. Subbayya Chettiar Vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras[SC 1950 DECEMBER]

1950- The control and management of a business remains in the hand of a person or a group of persons, and the question to be asked is wherefrom the person or group of persons controls or directs the business. (2) Mere activity by the company in a place does not create residence, with the result … Continue reading V. VR. N. M. Subbayya Chettiar Vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras[SC 1950 DECEMBER]

Moran M. Baselios marthoma Mathews II and OTHERS Vs State of Kerala and OTHERS [ALL SC 2007 APRIL]

AIR 2007 SCW 4367 : JT 2007 (6) SC 282 : (2007) 6 SCALE 134 : (2007) 6 SCC 517 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Moran M. Baselios marthoma Mathews II and OTHERS Appellant Versus State of Kerala and OTHERS Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Markandey Katju, JJ.) Civil Appeal Nos. 5460-5466 of 2004, … Continue reading Moran M. Baselios marthoma Mathews II and OTHERS Vs State of Kerala and OTHERS [ALL SC 2007 APRIL]

Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another [ ALL SC 1996 MARCH ]

AIR 1996 SC 3121 : (1996) 3 SCR 857 : (1996) 8 SCC 470 : JT 1996 (3) SC 446 : (1996) 3 SCALE 89 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another Respondent (Before: B. P. Jeevan Reddy, S. C. Sen And … Continue reading Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another [ ALL SC 1996 MARCH ]

D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

AIR 1980 SC 271 : (1980) 1 SCR 804 : (1980) 2 SCC 410 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus State of Kerala and another Respondent AND S. K. Subramanian Appellant Versus State of Kerala and others Respondent AND The Customs Clearing Agents’ Association Appellant Versus State … Continue reading D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

State of Punjab and ANOTHER Vs Jalour Singh and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 JANUARY ]

KEYWORDS:-Lok Adalat- AIR 2008 SC 1209 : (2008) 1 SCR 922 : (2008) 2 SCC 660 : JT 2008 (2) SC 83 : (2008) 2 SCALE 52 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of Punjab and ANOTHER Appellant Versus Jalour Singh and OTHERS Respondent (Before :  K. G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., G. P. Mathur And R. V. … Continue reading State of Punjab and ANOTHER Vs Jalour Singh and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 JANUARY ]