An admission is not conclusive as to the truth of the matter stated therein. It is only a piece of evidence, the weight to be
Providing 100% reservation for Scheduled Tribes in scheduled areas offends the spirit of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The Governor is not conferred power to make any law in derogation to Part III or other provisions of the Constitution of India in the exercise of his power under Clause I, Para 5 of Schedule V. It was also held that G.O.Ms. No.3 is discriminatory as the same adversely affects not only the open category candidates but also other Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and backward classes. It also opined that the reservation under Article 16(4) should not exceed 50%.
Spectator—Distinction with accomplice—A person witnessing crime but not passing on the information to Police cannot be termed as accomplice even though testimony of such person should be treated with caution.
Limitation Act, 1963—Articles 64 and 65—Adverse possession—Co-owner—Permissibility—Sole possession by one co-owner is not sufficient—There must be open assertion of hostile title against the other.
The period, within which all the lawful heirs of a deceased bargadar, where there are more than one lawful heir, may determine, under sub-section (1) of section 15A, one lawful heir who may continue the cultivation of such land, is thirty days from the date of death of the deceased bargadar.
In this Act, the expression “hotel” means an establishment held out by the proprietor as offering food, drink and, if so required, sleeping accommodation, without special contract, to any traveller presenting himself who appears able and willing to pay a reasonable sum for the services and facilities provided and who is in a fit state to be received.
Transfer Of Property Act, 1882—Sections 21 and 19—Transfer of interest—Contingent interest—Determination of—Considerations for—It must be determined by gathering intention from all the terms of document.
Pursuant to the Reference, the Commission conducted broad-based research and consulted stakeholders from various spheres – police, advocates, judicial officers, among others, on the issue of miscarriage of justice resulting in wrongful prosecution, incarceration and/or conviction. Taking into consideration the inputs and suggestions received, and upon extensive deliberations, discussions and in-depth study, the Commission has given shape to the present Report.
No High Court can arrogate that function to itself and pass on to us a matter which in its view is purely one involving questions of fact, because it finds itself helpless to redress the grievance. In such a case, the High Court should refuse to give a certificate under Art. 134 (1) (c) and ask the parties to approach us invoking our special jurisdiction under Art. 136 (1) of the Constitution.
SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) ACT, 1956 [As amended by the Finance Act, 2017] [42 OF 1956] SECTIONS PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions