M. C. Chockalingam and others Versus V. Manickavasagam and others[ALL SC 1973 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- LAWFUL POSSESSION-mesne profits DATE:- 31-10-1973. Lawful possession cannot be established without the concomitant existence of a lawful relationship between the landlord and the tenant. This relationship cannot be established against the consent of the landlord unless, however, in view of a special law, his consent becomes irrelevant. Lawful possession is not litigious possession and … Continue reading M. C. Chockalingam and others Versus V. Manickavasagam and others[ALL SC 1973 OCTOBER]

P. Malai Chami Versus M. Andi Ambalam and others[ALL SC 1973 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-COMMON LAW-SUIT IN EQUITY- ELECTION PETITION- DATE:-18-04-1973- AIR 1973 SC 2077 : (1973) 3 SCR 1016 : (1973) 2 SCC 170 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) P. Malai Chami Appellant Versus M. Andi Ambalam and others Respondent (Before : D. G. Palekar And A. Alagiriswami, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 649 of 1972, Decided on : 18-04-1973. … Continue reading P. Malai Chami Versus M. Andi Ambalam and others[ALL SC 1973 APRIL]

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and others Versus State of Kerala and another [ALL SC 1973 April]

KEYWORDS:- CONSTITUTION AMENDMENT- DATE:- 24-04-1973 AIR 1973 SC 1461 : (1973) Suppl. SCR 1 : (1973) 4 SCC 225 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and others Appellant Versus State of Kerala and another Respondent AND Shri Raghunath Rao Ganpath Rao and N. H. Nawab Mohammed Iftikhar Ali Khan Appellant Versus Union of … Continue reading Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and others Versus State of Kerala and another [ALL SC 1973 April]

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

AIR 1995 SC 2001 : (1995) 1 Suppl. SCR 542 : (1995) 4 Suppl. SCC 286 : JT 1995 (5) SC 1 : (1995) 4 SCALE 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma and another Respondent (Before: R. M. Sahai, B. P. Jeevan Reddy And S. … Continue reading Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

AIR 1980 SC 271 : (1980) 1 SCR 804 : (1980) 2 SCC 410 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus State of Kerala and another Respondent AND S. K. Subramanian Appellant Versus State of Kerala and others Respondent AND The Customs Clearing Agents’ Association Appellant Versus State … Continue reading D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association Appellant Versus Telugu Church Council [ALL SC 1996 JANUARY]

KEYWORDS:- RES JUDICATA AIR 1996 SC 987 : (1996) 1 SCR 322 : (1996) 2 SCC 520 : JT 1996 (1) SC 277 : (1996) 1 SCALE 253(2) (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association Appellant Versus Telugu Church Council Respondent (Before: S. C. Agrawal And B. P. Jeevan Reddy, JJ.) Civil … Continue reading CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association Appellant Versus Telugu Church Council [ALL SC 1996 JANUARY]

State of WEST BENGAL and others Versus Ranbindra Nath Sengupta and others [ALL SC 1998 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:- GOVERNMENT PREMISES- AIR 1998 SC 1738 : (1998) 2 SCR 599 : (1998) 4 SCC 277 : JT 1998 (3) SC 23 : (1998) 2 SCALE 593 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of WEST BENGAL and others Appellant Versus Ranbindra Nath Sengupta and others Respondent (Before: G. N. Ray And K. Venkataswami, JJ.) Civil … Continue reading State of WEST BENGAL and others Versus Ranbindra Nath Sengupta and others [ALL SC 1998 MARCH]

Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

AIR 2009 SC 3214 : (2009) 12 SCR 611 : JT 2009 (11) SC 516 : (2009) 10 SCALE 659 : (2009) CriLJ SC 4123 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sarju alias Ramu Appellant Versus State of U. P. Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Deepak Verma, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1446 of 2009 (arising … Continue reading Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

AIR 2002 SC 1056 : (2002) 1 SCR 988 : (2002) 3 SCC 11 : JT 2002 (2) SC 45 : (2002) 2 SCALE 125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Appellant Versus Ram Krishna and others Respondent WITH U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow Appellant Versus Neel Kant and others Respondent … Continue reading U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS:- SIT- WITNESS PROTECTION -FAIR TRIAL- COURT DIRECTIONS : (a) Ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts. (b) Providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) Relocation of witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF … Continue reading National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana If the information was received when the police officer was in the police station with sufficient time to take action, and if the police officer fails to record in writing the information received, or fails to send a copy thereof, to the official superior, then … Continue reading Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

Punjab National Bank and others Versus Surendra Prasad Sinha [ALL SC 1992 APRIL]

Keywords:- Limitation-Time barred Debt- The rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties. S. 3 of the Limitation Act 36.of 1963, for short “the Act” only bars the remedy, but does not destroy the right which the remedy relates to. The right to the debt continues to exist notwithstanding the … Continue reading Punjab National Bank and others Versus Surendra Prasad Sinha [ALL SC 1992 APRIL]

Ex-Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors [ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS: Principle of Promissory Estoppel – Reservist pension DATE: MAY 08, 2018 ACTS: Regulation 78 of the Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964,Naval Regulations Part-III HELD: “ The appellants are not entitled to count 50% of the Fleet Reserve as they were never drafted into the said reserve. Consequently, the appellants are not entitled to reservist pension. However, their cases … Continue reading Ex-Navy Direct Entry Artificers Association & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors [ALL SC 2018 MAY]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [3RD SET ]

A 1. Point out incorrect response under Cr. P.C.– (a) Inquiry is conducted by the Court (b) Inquiry is conducted after framing of charge (c) Inquiry is conducted prior of framing of charge (d) Inquiry is conducted by the Magistrate (Ans : b) 2. In a cognizable offence a police officer (a) Cannot arrest an … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [3RD SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [2ND SET ]

1. As per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the Cr.PC, a report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a ________ . Answer: Complaint. 2. __________ includes all the proceedings under the Cr.PC for the collection of evidence … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [2ND SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [1ST SET ]

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 1. Section 2 in Cr.P.C. defining “victim” as a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged includes (a) victim’s guardian (b) victim’s guardian or legal heir (c) victim’s neighbour (d) victim’s close … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [1ST SET ]

Sanjay Chandra Versus CBI[ALL SC 2011 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-BAIL In deciding BAIL applications an important factor which should certainly be taken into consideration by the court is the delay in concluding the trial. (2011) 13 SCALE 107 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sanjay Chandra Appellant Versus CBI Respondent (Before : H.L. Dattu and G.S. Singhvi, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 2178 of 2011 (Arising out … Continue reading Sanjay Chandra Versus CBI[ALL SC 2011 NOVEMBER]

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- anticipatory bail- AIR 1980 SC 1632 : (1980) 3 SCR 383 : (1980) 2 SCC 565 : (1980) CriLJ SC 1125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent AND Sarbajit Singh and another Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent (Before : Y. V. Chandrachud, C.J.I., P. N. … Continue reading Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- REVIEW PETITION – DEATH CONVICT- DATE:-2 September, 2014 A review petition filed by a convict whose death penalty is affirmed by this Court is required to be heard in open Court but cannot be decided by circulation. The right of a limited oral hearing in review petitions where death sentence is given, shall be … Continue reading Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Keywords:- Reservation for admission- The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC … Continue reading Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-SUIT- RIGHTS ON THE LAND-EXTINCTION OF OWNERSHIP RIGHT- DATE:- May 03, 2018 A right in the property once extinguished by operation of law, it cannot be revived unless the law itself provides for its revival in a particular situation. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. … Continue reading M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-Preliminary inquiry- DATE: 12 November, 2013- If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police … Continue reading Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. and others Vs Tapan Kr. Singh [ALL SC 2003 APRIL]

KEYWORD:- GD ENTRY-PUTTING WRONG SECTIONS BY POLICE IN FIR- The mentioning of a particular Section in the F.I.R. is not by itself conclusive as it is for the Court to frame charges having regard to the material on record. Even if a wrong Section is mentioned in the F.I.R., that does not prevent the Court … Continue reading Superintendent of Police, C.B.I. and others Vs Tapan Kr. Singh [ALL SC 2003 APRIL]

Union of India and another Vs W.N. Chadha[ ALL SC 1992 DECEMBER]

KEYWORD:-Notice before investigation- LETTER ROGATORY- AIR 1993 SC 1082 : (1992) 3 Suppl. SCR 594 : (1993) 4 Suppl. SCC 154 : JT 1992 Suppl. SC 255 : (1992) 3 SCALE 396 : (1993) CriLJ SC 859 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Union of India and another Appellant Versus W.N. Chadha Respondent (Before: S. Ratnavel Pandian … Continue reading Union of India and another Vs W.N. Chadha[ ALL SC 1992 DECEMBER]