Roshanlal Kuthiala and others Vs R. B. Mohan Singh Oberai[ALL SC 1974 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:-Evacuee property- EQUITY-EQUITABLE ADJUSTMENT- In India the historical and artificial distinction between Equity and Law does not exist and equity itself is enforced as law with all the built-in limitations we have adverted to. DATE:-17-10-1974 AIR 1975 SC 824 : (1975) 2 SCR 491 : (1975) 4 SCC 628 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Roshanlal Nuthiala … Continue reading Roshanlal Kuthiala and others Vs R. B. Mohan Singh Oberai[ALL SC 1974 OCTOBER]

Samsher Singh Vs State of Punjab and another[ALL SC 1974 AUGUST]

KEYWORDS:-termination of services of Subordinate Judges- DATE:-23-08-1974. the President and Governor, custodians of all executive and other powers under various Articles shall, by virtue of these provisions, exercise their formal constitutional powers only upon and in accordance with the advice of their Minister save in a few well-known exceptional situations. Without being dogmatic or exhaustive, … Continue reading Samsher Singh Vs State of Punjab and another[ALL SC 1974 AUGUST]

Smt. Satya Vs Teja Singh [ ALL SC 1974 October]

Whether Indian Courts bound to give recognition to divorce decrees granted by foreign Courts? DATE:-Decided on : 01-10-1974- Whether a Hindu marriage solemnised within this country can be validly annulled by a decree of divorce granted by a foreign Court ? AIR 1975 SC 105 : (1975) 2 SCR 97 : (1975) 1 SCC 120 … Continue reading Smt. Satya Vs Teja Singh [ ALL SC 1974 October]

State of Rajasthan Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta [All SC 2011 December]

KEYWORDS:-Murder acquittal (2011) 13 SCALE 140 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of Rajasthan Appellant Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta Respondent (Before : Swatanter Kumar and Ranjana Prakash Desai, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1502 of 2005 : Decided On: 01-12-2011 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 374 and 378—Appeal—There is very thin but fine distinction between appeal … Continue reading State of Rajasthan Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta [All SC 2011 December]

Whether the award could be set aside, if the Arbitral Tribunal has not followed the mandatory procedure prescribed under S. 24, 28 or 31(3), which affects the rights of the parties?

Under sub-section (1)(a) of S. 28 there is a mandate to the Arbitral Tribunal to decide the dispute in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in India. Admittedly, substantive law would include the Indian Contract Act, the Transfer of Property Act and other such laws in force. Suppose, if the … Continue reading Whether the award could be set aside, if the Arbitral Tribunal has not followed the mandatory procedure prescribed under S. 24, 28 or 31(3), which affects the rights of the parties?

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

AIR 1995 SC 2001 : (1995) 1 Suppl. SCR 542 : (1995) 4 Suppl. SCC 286 : JT 1995 (5) SC 1 : (1995) 4 SCALE 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma and another Respondent (Before: R. M. Sahai, B. P. Jeevan Reddy And S. … Continue reading Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

AIR 1980 SC 271 : (1980) 1 SCR 804 : (1980) 2 SCC 410 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus State of Kerala and another Respondent AND S. K. Subramanian Appellant Versus State of Kerala and others Respondent AND The Customs Clearing Agents’ Association Appellant Versus State … Continue reading D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Kerala and another [ ALL SC 1979 SEPTEMBER]

Scheduled Tribes in India as per The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976

MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS State/Union Territory-wise list of Scheduled Tribes in India Andaman and Nicobar Islands In accordance with The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976. Andamanese, Chariar, Chari, Kora, Tabo, Bo, Yere, Kede, Bea, Balawa, Bojigiyab, Juwai, Kol Jarawas Nicobarese Onges Sentinelese Shom Pens Andhra Pradesh In accordance with The Scheduled … Continue reading Scheduled Tribes in India as per The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976

Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

AIR 2009 SC 3214 : (2009) 12 SCR 611 : JT 2009 (11) SC 516 : (2009) 10 SCALE 659 : (2009) CriLJ SC 4123 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sarju alias Ramu Appellant Versus State of U. P. Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Deepak Verma, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1446 of 2009 (arising … Continue reading Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

AIR 2002 SC 1056 : (2002) 1 SCR 988 : (2002) 3 SCC 11 : JT 2002 (2) SC 45 : (2002) 2 SCALE 125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Appellant Versus Ram Krishna and others Respondent WITH U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow Appellant Versus Neel Kant and others Respondent … Continue reading U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS:- SIT- WITNESS PROTECTION -FAIR TRIAL- COURT DIRECTIONS : (a) Ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts. (b) Providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) Relocation of witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF … Continue reading National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

Munir Ahmad and others Vs State of Rajasthan [ALL SC 1989 January]

KEYWORDS:-Evidence by Affidavit- In the case of a living person evidence in judicial proceedings must be tendered by calling the witness to the witness stand and cannot be substituted by an affidavit unless the law permits it, e.g. Ss. 295 and 407(3), or the Court expressly allows it. AIR 1989 SC 705 : (1989) 1 … Continue reading Munir Ahmad and others Vs State of Rajasthan [ALL SC 1989 January]

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- anticipatory bail- AIR 1980 SC 1632 : (1980) 3 SCR 383 : (1980) 2 SCC 565 : (1980) CriLJ SC 1125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent AND Sarbajit Singh and another Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent (Before : Y. V. Chandrachud, C.J.I., P. N. … Continue reading Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

Lok Prahari through its General Secretary Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-Struck Down a Law  DATE:- MAY 07, 2018- “Section 4(3) of the 1981 Act cannot pass the test of Cof the Constitution of India and is, therefore, liable to be struck down. We, therefore, hold that the aforesaid Section 4(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Ministers (Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1981 is ultra vires the Constitution … Continue reading Lok Prahari through its General Secretary Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

The Companies Act, 2013 [SCHEDULE]

KEYWORDS:- CORPORATE LAW The Companies Act, 2013[CLICK] Schedule I (See sections 4 and 5) Table-A Memorandum of Association of a Company Limited by Shares 1st The name of the company is “…………………………….Limited / Private Limited”. 2nd The registered office of the company will be situated in the State of…………………………….. 3rd (a) The objects to be pursued … Continue reading The Companies Act, 2013 [SCHEDULE]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Keywords:- Reservation for admission- The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC … Continue reading Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-Preliminary inquiry- DATE: 12 November, 2013- If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police … Continue reading Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

Amarinder Singh Versus Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha and OTHERS[ ALL SC 2010 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-Parliamentary Privilege-expulsion of the MLAs- JT 2010 (4) SC 350 : (2010) 4 SCALE 354 : (2010) 6 SCC 113 : (2010) 4 SCR 1105 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Amarinder Singh Appellant Versus Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha and OTHERS Respondent (Before : K. G. Balakrishnan, C.J.,R. V. Raveendran,P. Sathasivam ,J. M. Panchal and R. … Continue reading Amarinder Singh Versus Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha and OTHERS[ ALL SC 2010 APRIL]

Sunil Batra Versus Delhi Administration[ ALL SC 1979 DECEMBER]

KEYWORD:-PAROLE- HARD LABOUR- OUTDATED LEGISLATION AIR 1980 SC 1579 : (1980) 2 SCR 557 : (1980) 3 SCC 488 : (1980) CriLJ SC 1099 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sunil Batra Appellant Versus Delhi Administration Respondent (Before : V. R. Krishna Iyer, R. S. Pathak And O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.) Writ Petn. No. 1009 of 1979, … Continue reading Sunil Batra Versus Delhi Administration[ ALL SC 1979 DECEMBER]

Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & ANR Vs. Kamala & ANR[ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-detention order – DATE:-April 10, 2018- The COFEPOSA Act did not require the detaining authority to mention the period of detention in the order of detention. When no period is mentioned in an order, the implication is that the detention is for the maximum period prescribed under the Act- ACT:-Section 3(1)(ii) of the Conservation of … Continue reading Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & ANR Vs. Kamala & ANR[ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

Sardar Singh Vs Smt. Krishna Devi and another[ ALL SC 1994 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-family arrangements-partial enforcement of contract instead of refusal of specific performance in its entirety- ” the award did not create any right, title or interest in the appellant for the first time, but it declared the pre-existing factum, namely the appellant and Kartar Lal purchased the property jointly and that Kartar Lal was the benamidar … Continue reading Sardar Singh Vs Smt. Krishna Devi and another[ ALL SC 1994 APRIL]

M. C. Chockalingam and others Versus V. Manickavasagam and others[ALL SC 1973 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- LAWFUL POSSESSION-mesne profits DATE:- 31-10-1973. Lawful possession cannot be established without the concomitant existence of a lawful relationship between the landlord and the tenant. This relationship cannot be established against the consent of the landlord unless, however, in view of a special law, his consent becomes irrelevant. Lawful possession is not litigious possession and … Continue reading M. C. Chockalingam and others Versus V. Manickavasagam and others[ALL SC 1973 OCTOBER]