The expression ‘tenant’ includes ‘a tenant continuing in possession after the termination of the tenancy in his favour’. It thus includes, by express provision, a quondam tenant whose nexus with the property is continuance in possession. The fact that a decree or any other process extinguishes the tenancy under the general law of real property does not terminate the status of a tenant under the Act having regard to the carefully drawn inclusive clause. Even here, we may mention by way of contrast that Subudhi’s case (supra) related to a statute where the definition in Section 2(5) of that Act expressly included “any person against whom a suit for ejectment is pending in a court of competent jurisdiction” and more pertinent to the point specially excluded “a person against whom a decree or order for eviction has been made by such a court.
AIR 1980 SC 271 : (1980) 1 SCR 804 : (1980) 2 SCC 410 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) D. G. Gouse and Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus State of Kerala and […]
KEYWORDS:-PAROLE AIR 1979 SC 1595 : (1980) 1 SCR 1 : (1979) 3 SCC 645 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Dharambir and another Appellant Versus State of U.P. Respondent (Before : V. R. […]
KEYWORD:-PAROLE- HARD LABOUR- OUTDATED LEGISLATION AIR 1980 SC 1579 : (1980) 2 SCR 557 : (1980) 3 SCC 488 : (1980) CriLJ SC 1099 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sunil Batra Appellant Versus […]
A mutt in Hindu Law is a judicial person capable of holding and vindicating legal rights, through the medium of human agency: SC
The property belonging to a math is in fact attached to the office of the mahant, and passed by inheritance to no one who does not fill the office. The head of […]
We may recall the well-known observations of Menon C. J., in Aldo Maria Patroni and Another Vs. E.C. Kesavan and Others, regarding the unique position of the head of an educational institution […]
If a party in Trial or appeal or revision dies and right to sue survives the L.Rs must be substituted otherwise suit shall be abated-SC
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DIVISION BENCH ( Before : D. A. Desai, J; Baharul Islam, J ) BIBI RAHMANI KHATOON AND OTHERS — Appellant Vs. HARKOO GOPE AND OTHERS — Respondent
Whereas suit was filed for recognition of right of easement and later on amendment sought in the plaint for introducing essential ingredients of easement – The amendment, if allowed at the appellate […]
School violence has been a persistent problem in the United States. For example, on January 29, 1979, a 16-year-old opened fire on Grover Cleveland Elementary School in San Diego, CA. She killed two adults […]
What is a substantial question of law would certainly depend upon facts and circumstances of every case and if a question of law had been settled by the highest court of the country that question however important and difficult it may have been regarded in the past and however large may be its effect on any of the parties, would not be regarded as substantial question of law. In Raghunath Prasad v. Deputy Commissioner of Partabgarh  54 LA. 126 the Judicial Committee observed that a question of law to be considered a “substantial question of law” need not be one of general importance and it could be a substantial question “as between the parties”.