Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- anticipatory bail- AIR 1980 SC 1632 : (1980) 3 SCR 383 : (1980) 2 SCC 565 : (1980) CriLJ SC 1125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent AND Sarbajit Singh and another Appellant Versus The State of Punjab Respondent (Before : Y. V. Chandrachud, C.J.I., P. N.… Read More Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Versus The State of Punjab [ALL SC 1980 APRIL]

P.N. Eswara Iyer Vs The Registrar, Supreme Court of India [ALL SC 1980 FEBRUARY]

KEYWORDS:- Power of review- ORAL HEARING IS NOT REQUIRED IN EVERY STAGE- DATE:-01-02-1980 An oral hearing is mandatory in all classes of cases and at every stage of every case is a proposition to which we find ourselves unable to accede A review of a judgment is a serious step and reluctant resort to it… Read More P.N. Eswara Iyer Vs The Registrar, Supreme Court of India [ALL SC 1980 FEBRUARY]

Minerva Mills Ltd. and others Versus Union of India and others[ALL SC 1980 July]

KEYWORDS:-NATIONALISATION-Constitutional amendment- DATE:-31-07-1980 Whether Directive Principles of State policy can have primacy over the fundamental rights The summary of the various judgments in Kesavananda Bharati (supra) was signed by nine out of the thirteen Judges. Paragraph 2 of the summary reads to say that according to the majority. “Article 368 does not enable Parliament to… Read More Minerva Mills Ltd. and others Versus Union of India and others[ALL SC 1980 July]

Union of India and others Vs Dev Raj Gupta  and others [ALL SC 1990 OCTOBER]

Conversion of land in Delhi (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Union of India and others Versus Dev Raj Gupta  and others (Before: P. B. Sawant And K. Ramaswamy, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 1996 of 1990, Decided on: 23-10-1990. Delhi Development Act, 1957—Section 7—Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976—Section 20(1). Judgment Sawant, J—This appeal raises some… Read More Union of India and others Vs Dev Raj Gupta  and others [ALL SC 1990 OCTOBER]

STATE OF HARYANA Vs. RAMA DIYA [All SC 1990 APRIL]

According to Section 433(A) that a prisoner who has been sentenced to death and whose death sentence has been commuted into one of imprisonment for life and persons who have been sentenced to imprisonment for life for an offence for which death is one of the punishments provided by law should undergo actual imprisonment of 14 years in Jail. We are referring to Section 433(A) in this judgment only for a limited purpose of showing that after the introduction of this section, the life convicts falling within the purview of Section 433(A) has to undergo the mandatory minimum 14 years of actual imprisonment. It may be mentioned at this juncture that no one has got a vested right to claim premature release on the ground that he has suffered the minimum actual imprisonment as prescribed under Section 433(A) because a sentence of ‘imprisonment for life’ is incarceration until death, that is, for the remaining period of convicted prison’s actual life… Read More STATE OF HARYANA Vs. RAMA DIYA [All SC 1990 APRIL]

Ramvir Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [ALL SC 2018 OCTOBER]

MURDER-Acquittal of the accused. DATE: October 26, 2018. ACT: Section 148/149 read with Section 302 IPC SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Ramvir Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 183 of 2013] Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the accused(A1) against the final judgment and order dated 28.02.2012 passed by the High Court… Read More Ramvir Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [ALL SC 2018 OCTOBER]

The Tripura Education Institutions (Acquisition of Right, Title and Interest) Act, 1980

An Act to provide in the public interest for the acquisition and transfer of the right, title and interest of certain educational institutions in Tripura, with a view to secure better and efficient management thereof and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto. Be it enacted by the Legislative Assembly of Tripura in the Thirty-first… Read More The Tripura Education Institutions (Acquisition of Right, Title and Interest) Act, 1980

West Bengal Services (Duties, Rights and Obligations of the Government employees) Rules, 1980

1. Short title, application and commencement—(1) These rules may be called the West Bengal Services (Duties, Rights and Obligations of the Government employees) Rules, 1980. (2) They shall apply to all employees ot die Government of West Bengal: Provided that nothing in these rules shall apply to persons appointed to any All India Service and members of the… Read More West Bengal Services (Duties, Rights and Obligations of the Government employees) Rules, 1980

The West Bengal Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes (Identification) Act, 1994

Identification of members of Scheduled Tribes. – Any person belonging to any of the tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communities, specified in Part XII of the Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, and resident in the locality specified in relation to him in that Part of such Schedule, may be identified, by a certificate, to be a member of the Scheduled Tribes.… Read More The West Bengal Scheduled Castes And Scheduled Tribes (Identification) Act, 1994

THE WEST BENGAL BACKWARD CLASSES (OTHER THAN SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES) (RESERVATION OF VACANCIES IN SERVICES AND POSTS) ACT, 2012.

Other Backward Classes” shall mean such classes of citizens as specified in Schedule I, other than Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and includes such classes as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify from time to time… Read More THE WEST BENGAL BACKWARD CLASSES (OTHER THAN SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES) (RESERVATION OF VACANCIES IN SERVICES AND POSTS) ACT, 2012.

MANI SUBRAT JAIN Vs. RAJA RAM VOHRA [ALL SC 1979 NOVEMBER]

The expression ‘tenant’ includes ‘a tenant continuing in possession after the termination of the tenancy in his favour’. It thus includes, by express provision, a quondam tenant whose nexus with the property is continuance in possession. The fact that a decree or any other process extinguishes the tenancy under the general law of real property does not terminate the status of a tenant under the Act having regard to the carefully drawn inclusive clause. Even here, we may mention by way of contrast that Subudhi’s case (supra) related to a statute where the definition in Section 2(5) of that Act expressly included “any person against whom a suit for ejectment is pending in a court of competent jurisdiction” and more pertinent to the point specially excluded “a person against whom a decree or order for eviction has been made by such a court.… Read More MANI SUBRAT JAIN Vs. RAJA RAM VOHRA [ALL SC 1979 NOVEMBER]

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS Vs. C.N. SAHASRANAMAN AND ORS [ALL SC 1986 APRIL]

The main question which needs determination is whether part of the scheme mentioned before introduced by the Reserve Bank of India is violative of guarantee of equality before law and of equal opportunity in public employment as enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The High Court noted that the point arose at the instance of three petitioners who were Grade II working at Nagpur branch of Reserve Bank ever since their employment which commenced somewhere between 1960 to 1965.… Read More RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS Vs. C.N. SAHASRANAMAN AND ORS [ALL SC 1986 APRIL]