Ranjit Singh Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh [ALL SC 1983 SEPTEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- PAROLE – MURDER DURING IN PAROLE AIR 1984 SC 45 : (1984) 1 SCC 31 : (1983) 2 SCALE 539 : (1983) CriLJ SC 1730 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Ranjit Singh Appellant Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh Respondent (Before : V. D. Tulzapurkar, V. Balakrishna Eradi And D. P. Madon, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. … Continue reading Ranjit Singh Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh [ALL SC 1983 SEPTEMBER]

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

AIR 1995 SC 2001 : (1995) 1 Suppl. SCR 542 : (1995) 4 Suppl. SCC 286 : JT 1995 (5) SC 1 : (1995) 4 SCALE 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma and another Respondent (Before: R. M. Sahai, B. P. Jeevan Reddy And S. … Continue reading Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. Janardan Singh & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

KEYWORDS:-Special (Duty) Allowance- Equality before Law-Valid classification- DATE:- JULY 02, 2018 Article 14 does not prohibit reasonable classification but for passing test of permissible classification there are two conditions as observed in Budhan Choudhary versus State of Bihar must be satisfied. ACT:- Article 14 of Indian Constitution SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. … Continue reading Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. Janardan Singh & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS:- SIT- WITNESS PROTECTION -FAIR TRIAL- COURT DIRECTIONS : (a) Ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts. (b) Providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) Relocation of witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF … Continue reading National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

Punjab National Bank and others Versus Surendra Prasad Sinha [ALL SC 1992 APRIL]

Keywords:- Limitation-Time barred Debt- The rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties. S. 3 of the Limitation Act 36.of 1963, for short “the Act” only bars the remedy, but does not destroy the right which the remedy relates to. The right to the debt continues to exist notwithstanding the … Continue reading Punjab National Bank and others Versus Surendra Prasad Sinha [ALL SC 1992 APRIL]

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- REVIEW PETITION – DEATH CONVICT- DATE:-2 September, 2014 A review petition filed by a convict whose death penalty is affirmed by this Court is required to be heard in open Court but cannot be decided by circulation. The right of a limited oral hearing in review petitions where death sentence is given, shall be … Continue reading Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

Richal & Ors. Etc. Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-Reexamination of Answer Sheet-Publication of key answers- DATE:-MAY 03, 2018. The key answers prepared by the papersetter or the examining body is presumed to have been prepared after due deliberations. To err is human. There are various factors which may lead to framing of the incorrect key answers. The publication of key answers is a … Continue reading Richal & Ors. Etc. Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-Preliminary inquiry- DATE: 12 November, 2013- If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police … Continue reading Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & ANR Vs. Kamala & ANR[ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-detention order – DATE:-April 10, 2018- The COFEPOSA Act did not require the detaining authority to mention the period of detention in the order of detention. When no period is mentioned in an order, the implication is that the detention is for the maximum period prescribed under the Act- ACT:-Section 3(1)(ii) of the Conservation of … Continue reading Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Public (Law and Order) Revenue Department & ANR Vs. Kamala & ANR[ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

Bakhtawar Singh and another Vs Sada Kaur and another [ALL SC 1996 AUGUST]

KEYWORDS:- WITHDRAWL OF SUIT- DEFECT WAS NOT EXPLAINED- DEFECTIVE SUIT “the order dated May 20, 1971 passed by the civil court was on record which did not indicate as to what was the formal defect in the suit by reason of which the permission to withdraw the same was accorded”. DATE:-28-08-1996 AIR 1996 SC 3488 … Continue reading Bakhtawar Singh and another Vs Sada Kaur and another [ALL SC 1996 AUGUST]

Ashok Kumar Mandal Appellant Versus Rabindra Nath Banerjee (D) by LRs. and Others[ALL SC 2003 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- DATE:-03-12-2003 (2004) 10 SCC 578 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Ashok Kumar Mandal Appellant Versus Rabindra Nath Banerjee (D) by LRs. and Others Respondent (Before : Brijesh Kumar and Arun Kumar, JJ.) Decided On: 03-12-2003 Calcutta thika tenancy (Acquisition and Regulation) Act, 1981—Sections 5 and 19. ORDER 1. This appeal is preferred against the order … Continue reading Ashok Kumar Mandal Appellant Versus Rabindra Nath Banerjee (D) by LRs. and Others[ALL SC 2003 DECEMBER]

Narayan Chandra Ghosh and ORS Vs Kanailal Ghosh and ORS[ALL SC 2005 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- THIKA TENANCY- RENT- EVICTION DATE:-16-11-2005 AIR 2006 SC 562 : (2005) 5 Suppl. SCR 250 : (2006) 1 SCC 175 : JT 2005 (9) SC 613 : (2005) 9 SCALE 350 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Narayan Chandra Ghosh and OTHERS Appellant Versus Kanailal Ghosh and OTHERS Respondent (Before : B. N. Agrawal And A. … Continue reading Narayan Chandra Ghosh and ORS Vs Kanailal Ghosh and ORS[ALL SC 2005 NOVEMBER]

Prashant Bharti vs State Of NCT Of Delhi [ALL SC 2013 JANUARY]

KEYWORDS:-False rape charge- DATE:- 23 January, 2013 ACTS:-Section 376 IPC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 175 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 1800 OF 2009) Prashant Bharti vs State Of Nct Of Delhi Bench: D.K. Jain, Jagdish Singh Khehar J U D G M E N T JAGDISH SINGH … Continue reading Prashant Bharti vs State Of NCT Of Delhi [ALL SC 2013 JANUARY]

Kameshwar Singh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors[ALLSC 2018 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- MURDER- CONVICTION DATE:- April 9, 2018. ACTS:- Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of The Railway Protection (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Kameshwar Singh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [Criminal Appeal No. 903 of 2012] Tarkeshwar Singh and Others Vs. State … Continue reading Kameshwar Singh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors[ALLSC 2018 APRIL]

Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs. Union of India and Another[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:-right to die with dignity- DATE:-MARCH 09, 2018 An adult human being having mental capacity to take an informed decision has right to refuse medical treatment including withdrawal from life saving devices.  A person of competent mental faculty is entitled to execute an advance medical directive in accordance with safeguards as referred to above SUPREME … Continue reading Common Cause (A Regd. Society) Vs. Union of India and Another[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

Kerala State Electricity Board and ANR. Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and ANR.[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:- termination of contract- DATE:-March 09, 2018 When there was no arbitration agreement between the parties, without a joint memo or a joint application of the parties, the High Court ought not to have referred the parties to arbitration. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Kerala State Electricity Board and ANR. Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and ANR. [Civil … Continue reading Kerala State Electricity Board and ANR. Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and ANR.[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

Whether adverse inference could be drawn against the accused merely on the basis of recoveries made on their disclosure statements.

In Gulab Chand v. State of M.P., AIR 1995 SC 1598, Supreme Court upheld the conviction for committing dacoity on the basis of recovery of ornaments of the deceased from the possession of the person accused of robbery and murder immediately after the occurrence. 7.2. In Geejaganda Somaiah v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2007 SC … Continue reading Whether adverse inference could be drawn against the accused merely on the basis of recoveries made on their disclosure statements.

Abdulrasakh Vs. K.P. Mohammed & Ors[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:-Election petition-Exhibits- DATE:- copies of the documents have been supplied to the appellant and multiple copies of the phone or the chip (which is kept in a sealed cover) are not mandated to be supplied when the material relied upon in the phone has been reproduced in CD and a transcription also provided. The defence … Continue reading Abdulrasakh Vs. K.P. Mohammed & Ors[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

Pankajbhai Rameshbhai vs Jethabhai Kalabhai Zalavadiya[ALL SC 2017 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- Impleadment of Party- Mentioning wrong provision- DATE:- 3 October, 2017 It is by now well settled that a mere wrong mention of the provision in the application would not prohibit a party to the litigation from getting justice there is no bar for filing the application under Order 1 Rule 10, even when the … Continue reading Pankajbhai Rameshbhai vs Jethabhai Kalabhai Zalavadiya[ALL SC 2017 OCTOBER]

Sitaram Vs. Radhey Shyam Vishnav & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:-Election Petition- DATE:- March 06, 2018 The deposit of treasury challan which means deposit of the requisite amount in treasury at the time of presentation of the election petition is mandatory ACTS:-Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sitaram Vs. Radhey Shyam Vishnav & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 1200 of … Continue reading Sitaram Vs. Radhey Shyam Vishnav & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MARCH]

A.R. Antulay Versus R.S. Naik and others[ALL SC 1986 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:-transfer of a criminal case DATE:-29-10-1986 AIR 1987 SC 1140 : (1987) 1 SCR 91 : (1986) Suppl. SCC 510 : JT 1986 SC 759 : (1986) 2 SCALE 703 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) A.R. Antulay Appellant Versus R.S. Naik and others Respondent (Before : E. S. Venkataramiah And Sabyasachi Mukharji, JJ.) Criminal Misc. Petition … Continue reading A.R. Antulay Versus R.S. Naik and others[ALL SC 1986 OCTOBER]