Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano Begum and others[SC 1985 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-Maintenance to Muslim wife- DATE:- 23-04-1985- whether the law of Islam is capable of evolution ? AIR 1985 SC 945 : (1985) 3 SCR 844 : (1985) 2 SCC 556 : (1985) 1 SCALE 767 : (1985) CriLJ SC 875 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Mohd. Ahmed Khan Appellant Versus Shah Bano Begum and others Respondent (Before … Continue reading Mohd. Ahmed Khan Vs Shah Bano Begum and others[SC 1985 APRIL]

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

AIR 1995 SC 2001 : (1995) 1 Suppl. SCR 542 : (1995) 4 Suppl. SCC 286 : JT 1995 (5) SC 1 : (1995) 4 SCALE 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma and another Respondent (Before: R. M. Sahai, B. P. Jeevan Reddy And S. … Continue reading Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

M/s. Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Appellant Versus CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association, Madras [ALL SC 1992 APRIL ]

AIR 1992 SC 1439 : (1992) 2 SCR 999 : (1992) 3 SCC 1 : JT 1992 (3) SC 98 : (1992) 1 SCALE 947 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) M/s. Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Appellant Versus CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association, Madras Respondent (Before: N. M. Kasliwal, M. M. Punchhi And S. C. Agrawal, … Continue reading M/s. Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Appellant Versus CHURCH of SOUTH India Trust Association, Madras [ALL SC 1992 APRIL ]

Cantonment Board and An Other Vs CHURCH of NORTH India [ALL SC 2011 MAY]

(2011) 6 SCALE 229 : JT 2011 (6) SC 49 : AIR 2011 SC 2339 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Cantonment Board and AnOther Appellant Versus CHURCH of NORTH India Respondent (Before : P. Sathasivam and H. L. Gokhale, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. 1957 of 2003 : Decided On: 13-05-2011 Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) … Continue reading Cantonment Board and An Other Vs CHURCH of NORTH India [ALL SC 2011 MAY]

Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and another Versus State of Andhra Pradesh [ ALL SC 1993 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS: Dying declaration- AIR 1993 SCW 1321 : (1993) CriLJ SC 1635 : JT 1993 (2) SC 559 : (1993) 2 SCALE 214 : (1993) 2 SCC 684 : (1993) 2 SCR 666 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and another Appellant Versus State of ANDHRA PRADESH Respondent (Before : Dr. A. S. Anand … Continue reading Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and another Versus State of Andhra Pradesh [ ALL SC 1993 MARCH ]

Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

AIR 2009 SC 3214 : (2009) 12 SCR 611 : JT 2009 (11) SC 516 : (2009) 10 SCALE 659 : (2009) CriLJ SC 4123 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sarju alias Ramu Appellant Versus State of U. P. Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Deepak Verma, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1446 of 2009 (arising … Continue reading Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

AIR 2002 SC 1056 : (2002) 1 SCR 988 : (2002) 3 SCC 11 : JT 2002 (2) SC 45 : (2002) 2 SCALE 125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Appellant Versus Ram Krishna and others Respondent WITH U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow Appellant Versus Neel Kant and others Respondent … Continue reading U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS:- SIT- WITNESS PROTECTION -FAIR TRIAL- COURT DIRECTIONS : (a) Ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts. (b) Providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) Relocation of witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF … Continue reading National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana If the information was received when the police officer was in the police station with sufficient time to take action, and if the police officer fails to record in writing the information received, or fails to send a copy thereof, to the official superior, then … Continue reading Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

Courts should not place reliance on decisions without discussing as to how the factual situation fits in with the fact-situation of the decision on which reliance is placed.

Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta Versus M/s. Alnoori Tobacco Products and another [All SC 2004 July] AIR 2004 SCW 4311 : JT 2004 (5) SC 593 : (2004) 6 SCALE 232 : (2004) 6 SCC 186 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta Appellant Versus M/s. Alnoori Tobacco Products and another Respondent (Before : S. … Continue reading Courts should not place reliance on decisions without discussing as to how the factual situation fits in with the fact-situation of the decision on which reliance is placed.

M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

KEYWORDS:- UNREGISTERED DEED RATIO DECIDENDI : A document required to be registered is not admissible into evidence under Section 49 of the Registration Act. 2. Such unregistered document can however be used as an evidence of collateral purpose as provided in the Proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act. 3. A collateral transaction must … Continue reading M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

The Establishment Clause And Public Schools

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 53 (1985) as held:- “The individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all”); see also County of Allegheny v. ACLU Greater … Continue reading The Establishment Clause And Public Schools

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- REVIEW PETITION – DEATH CONVICT- DATE:-2 September, 2014 A review petition filed by a convict whose death penalty is affirmed by this Court is required to be heard in open Court but cannot be decided by circulation. The right of a limited oral hearing in review petitions where death sentence is given, shall be … Continue reading Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

The Companies Act, 2013 [SCHEDULE]

KEYWORDS:- CORPORATE LAW The Companies Act, 2013[CLICK] Schedule I (See sections 4 and 5) Table-A Memorandum of Association of a Company Limited by Shares 1st The name of the company is “…………………………….Limited / Private Limited”. 2nd The registered office of the company will be situated in the State of…………………………….. 3rd (a) The objects to be pursued … Continue reading The Companies Act, 2013 [SCHEDULE]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Keywords:- Reservation for admission- The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC … Continue reading Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-SUIT- RIGHTS ON THE LAND-EXTINCTION OF OWNERSHIP RIGHT- DATE:- May 03, 2018 A right in the property once extinguished by operation of law, it cannot be revived unless the law itself provides for its revival in a particular situation. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. … Continue reading M/s. Eureka Builders & Ors. Vs. Gulabchand S/o. Veljee Dand (D) by LRS. & Ors. Etc.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-Preliminary inquiry- DATE: 12 November, 2013- If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police … Continue reading Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

Union of India and another Vs W.N. Chadha[ ALL SC 1992 DECEMBER]

KEYWORD:-Notice before investigation- LETTER ROGATORY- AIR 1993 SC 1082 : (1992) 3 Suppl. SCR 594 : (1993) 4 Suppl. SCC 154 : JT 1992 Suppl. SC 255 : (1992) 3 SCALE 396 : (1993) CriLJ SC 859 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Union of India and another Appellant Versus W.N. Chadha Respondent (Before: S. Ratnavel Pandian … Continue reading Union of India and another Vs W.N. Chadha[ ALL SC 1992 DECEMBER]

Dadu alias Tulsidas Versus State of Maharashtra[ ALL SC 2000 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:-PAROLE-NDPS DATE:-12-10-2000 Parole did not amount to the suspension, remission or commutation of sentences which could be withheld under the garb of S. 32-A of the Act. AIR 2000 SC 3203 : (2000) 8 SCC 437 : JT 2000 (1) Suppl. SC 449 : (2000) 6 SCALE 746 : (2000) CriLJ SC 4619 (SUPREME COURT … Continue reading Dadu alias Tulsidas Versus State of Maharashtra[ ALL SC 2000 OCTOBER]

Arif Khan @ Agha Khan Vs. State of Uttarakhand[ ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-NDPS- DATE-April 27, 2018 “Since the non-compliance of the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 50 of the NDPS Act is fatal to the prosecution case and, in this case, we have found that the prosecution has failed to prove the compliance as required in law“ ACTS:- Section 20 & 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic … Continue reading Arif Khan @ Agha Khan Vs. State of Uttarakhand[ ALL SC 2018 APRIL]

PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS UNDER THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985[NDPS]

THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 41. Power to issue warrant and authorisation.— (1) A Metropolitan Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first class or any Magistrate of the second-class specially empowered by the State Government in this behalf, may issue a warrant for the arrest of any person whom he has reason to … Continue reading PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS UNDER THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985[NDPS]