State Of M.P. vs Mangilal Sharma[ALL SC 1997 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- declaratory decree- EXECUTION- DATE :- 18 December, 1997 Respondent could not have sought execution of the declaratory decree when no relief was granted to him towards arrears of salary and other consequential benefits. ACT:- SECTION 34 SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT Supreme Court of India State Of M.P. vs Mangilal Sharma Equivalent citations: AIR 1998 SC 743, 1998… Read More State Of M.P. vs Mangilal Sharma[ALL SC 1997 DECEMBER]

L. Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India and others[ALL SC 1997 MARCH]

KEYWORDS:- VALIDITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL-power of judicial review DATE:-18-03-1997 The Tribunals are competent to hear matters where the vires of statutory provisions are questioned. However, in discharging this duty, they cannot act as substitutes for the High Courts and the Supreme Court which have, under our constitutional setup, been specifically entrusted with such an obligation.… Read More L. Chandra Kumar Vs Union of India and others[ALL SC 1997 MARCH]

Krishnan and another Vs Krishnaveni and another [SC 1997 January]

KEYWORD:- SECOND REVISION-INHERENT POWER- SECTION 482 Cr.P.C 24-01-1997 AIR 1997 SC 987 : (1997) 1 SCR 511 : (1997) 4 SCC 241 : JT 1997 (1) SC 657 : (1997) 1 SCALE 458 : (1997) CriLJ SC 1519 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Krishnan and another Appellant Versus Krishnaveni and another Respondent (Before: K. Ramaswamy, S.… Read More Krishnan and another Vs Krishnaveni and another [SC 1997 January]

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and another vs Gajanan Y. Mandrekar[SC 1997 March]

Keywords:-Damages-Proportionate deduction- Proportionate deduction for use of the vehicle would have been given in Consumer case When the vehicle was being used with the same defects as pointed out, necessarily the purchaser is required to be compensated for not delivering the vehicle in good condition as per the warranty after deduction towards the use of… Read More Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and another vs Gajanan Y. Mandrekar[SC 1997 March]

STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

A number of judgments have been cited including the celebrated Supreme Court judgment in Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Another, 1998 (4) SCC 409, in which a Constitution Bench of this Court held that Article 142 cannot authorize the Court to ignore the substantive rights of a litigant while dealing with the cause pending before it and cannot be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the cause before this Court. A large number of other judgments following this judgment were also cited. … Read More STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

The Hardwar Kumbha Mela Rules, 1997

 Under United Provinces Melas Act, 1938 Published vide Notification No. 628K/9-1-97-13HKM/97, dated 23rd September, 1997, published in the U.P. Gazette, Extraordinary, Part 4, Section (Kha), dated 23rd September, 1997 In exercise of the powers under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the United Provinces Melas Act, 1938 (U.P. Act No. XVI of 1938), the Governor… Read More The Hardwar Kumbha Mela Rules, 1997

Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice [ALL SC 2018 September]

September 6, 2018:-SECTION 377of IPC-Homosexuality-It is declared that insofar as Section 377 criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults (i.e. persons above the age of 18 years who are competent to consent) in private, is violative of Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. It is, however, clarified that such consent must be free consent,… Read More Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice [ALL SC 2018 September]

Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr vs Naz Foundation & Ors [ALL SC 2013 DECEMBER]

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10972 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.15436 of 2009) Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr vs Naz Foundation & Ors Decided on: 11 December 2013 Bench: G.S. Singhvi, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya JUDGMENT G.S. SINGHVI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals are directed against order… Read More Suresh Kumar Koushal & Anr vs Naz Foundation & Ors [ALL SC 2013 DECEMBER]

C. Venkatachalam Versus Ajitkumar C. Shah and Others [ALL SC 2011 AUGUST]

In order to ensure smooth, consistent, uniform and unvarying functioning of the National Commission, the State Commissions and the District Forums, we deem it appropriate to direct the National Commission to frame comprehensive rules regarding appearances of the agents, representatives, registered organizations and/or non-advocates appearing before the National Commission, the State Commissions and the District Forums governing their qualifications, conduct and ethical behaviour of agents/non-advocates/representatives, registered organizations and/or agents appearing before the consumer forums.… Read More C. Venkatachalam Versus Ajitkumar C. Shah and Others [ALL SC 2011 AUGUST]

State of West Bengal and ORS Vs  The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal and ORS [ ALL SC 2010 FEBRUARY]

It may not be out of place to mention that in so far as this Court is concerned, apart from Articles 32 and 142 which empower this Court to issue such directions, as may be necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter, Article 144 of the Constitution also mandates all authorities, civil or judicial in the territory of India, to act in aid of the orders passed by this Court.… Read More State of West Bengal and ORS Vs  The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal and ORS [ ALL SC 2010 FEBRUARY]

Kuldip Nayar Versus Union of India and Ors [ALL SC 2006 AUGUST]

In the writ petition, there is a further challenge to the amendments in Sections 59, 94 and 128 of the RP Act, 1951 by which Open Ballot System is introduced which, according to the petitioner, violates the principle of ‘secrecy’ which, according to the petitioner, is the essence of free and fair elections as also the voter’s freedom of expression which is the basic feature of the Constitution and the subject matter of the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.… Read More Kuldip Nayar Versus Union of India and Ors [ALL SC 2006 AUGUST]