Saleem Bhai and others Vs State of Maharashtra and others [All SC 2002 December]

KEYWORDS: Written statement- Rejection of Plaint- AIR 2003 SC 759 : (2002) 5 Suppl. SCR 491 : (2003) 1 SCC 557 : JT 2002 (10) SC 558 : (2002) 9 SCALE 616 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Saleem Bhai and others Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra and others Respondent (Before : S. S. M. Quadri And… Read More Saleem Bhai and others Vs State of Maharashtra and others [All SC 2002 December]

U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

AIR 2002 SC 1056 : (2002) 1 SCR 988 : (2002) 3 SCC 11 : JT 2002 (2) SC 45 : (2002) 2 SCALE 125 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Appellant Versus Ram Krishna and others Respondent WITH U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow Appellant Versus Neel Kant and others Respondent… Read More U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Versus Ram Krishna and others [ALL SC 2002 FEBRUARY ]

Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Others Vs Indian Institute of Chemical Biology and Others[ALL SC 2002 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- parity of remuneration- Definition of State- DATE:-16-04-2002 Whether an entity is an instrumentality or agency of the State? JT 2002 (4) SC 146 : (2002) 3 SCALE 638 : (2002) 5 SCC 111 : (2002) 3 SCR 100 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Others Appellant Versus Indian Institute of Chemical Biology… Read More Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Others Vs Indian Institute of Chemical Biology and Others[ALL SC 2002 APRIL]

Rupa Ashok Hurra Versus Ashok Hurra and another[ALL SC 2002 APRIL]

Keywords:-RELIEF AGAINST DISMISSIAL OF REVIEW PETITION- Date:-10-04-2002- Whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against a final judgment/order of this Court, after dismissal of review petition, either under Article 32 of the Constitution or otherwise? AIR 2002 SC 1771 : (2002) 2 SCR 1006 : (2002) 4 SCC 388 : JT 2002 (3)… Read More Rupa Ashok Hurra Versus Ashok Hurra and another[ALL SC 2002 APRIL]

K. M. Mathew Appellant Vs K. A. Abraham and others[ALL SC 2002 AUGUST]

KEYWORDS:-DEFAMATION-NEWSPAPER- DATE:-23-08-2002 In the case of publication of any newspaper, each copy of the publication shall contain the names of the owner and the editor who have printed and published that newspaper. AIR 2002 SC 2989 : (2002) 1 Suppl. SCR 662 : (2002) 6 SCC 670 : JT 2002 (6) SC 248 : (2002)… Read More K. M. Mathew Appellant Vs K. A. Abraham and others[ALL SC 2002 AUGUST]

T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others vs State of Karnataka and others[ALL SC 2002 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- Establishment of educational institutions-Fundamental right- DATE:-31-10-2002 Supreme Court not to create substantive Constitutional rights in the name of guaranteeing equal protection The only interplay between Articles 29(2) and 30(1) is that once State aid is taken, then students of all communities must be admitted. In other words, no citizen can be refused admission on… Read More T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others vs State of Karnataka and others[ALL SC 2002 OCTOBER]

V. KISHAN RAO Vs. NIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL AND ANOTHER [ALL SC 2010 MARCH]

We are of the view that aforesaid directions are not consistent with the law laid down by the larger Bench in Mathew (supra). In Mathew (supra), the direction for consulting the opinion of another doctor before proceeding with criminal investigation was confined only in cases of criminal complaint and not in respect of cases before the Consumer Forum. The reason why the larger Bench in Mathew (supra) did not equate the two is obvious in view of the jurisprudential and conceptual difference between cases of negligence in civil and criminal matter. This has been elaborately discussed in Mathew (supra). This distinction has been accepted in the judgment of this Court in Malay Kumar Ganguly (supra) (See paras 133 and 180 at pages 274 and 284 of the report).… Read More V. KISHAN RAO Vs. NIKHIL SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL AND ANOTHER [ALL SC 2010 MARCH]

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF ARTISTS AND TECHNICIANS OF W.B. FILM AND TELEVISION [ALL SC 2017 MARCH]

While identifying the relevant market in a given case, the CCI is required to look at evidence that is available and relevant to the case at hand. The CCI has to define the boundaries of the relevant market as precisely as required by the circumstances of the case. Where appropriate, it may conduct its competition… Read More COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF ARTISTS AND TECHNICIANS OF W.B. FILM AND TELEVISION [ALL SC 2017 MARCH]

Gottumukkala Venkata Krishamraju Vs. Union of India & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 SEPTEMBER]

SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 : Ordinarily wherever the word ‘substitute’ or ‘substitution’ is used by the legislature, it has the effect of deleting the old provision and make the new provision operative. The process of substitution consists of two steps: first, the old rule is made to cease to exist and, next, the new rule is brought into existence in its place. The rule is that when a subsequent Act amends an earlier one in such a way as to incorporate itself, or a part of itself, into the earlier, then the earlier Act must thereafter be read and construed as if the altered words had been written into the earlier Act with pen and ink and the old words scored out so that thereafter there is no need to refer to the amending Act at all. No doubt, in certain situations, the Court having regard to the purport and object sought to be achieved by the Legislature may construe the word “substitution” as an “amendment” having a prospective effect.… Read More Gottumukkala Venkata Krishamraju Vs. Union of India & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 SEPTEMBER]

STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

A number of judgments have been cited including the celebrated Supreme Court judgment in Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Another, 1998 (4) SCC 409, in which a Constitution Bench of this Court held that Article 142 cannot authorize the Court to ignore the substantive rights of a litigant while dealing with the cause pending before it and cannot be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the cause before this Court. A large number of other judgments following this judgment were also cited. … Read More STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice [ALL SC 2018 September]

September 6, 2018:-SECTION 377of IPC-Homosexuality-It is declared that insofar as Section 377 criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults (i.e. persons above the age of 18 years who are competent to consent) in private, is violative of Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. It is, however, clarified that such consent must be free consent,… Read More Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice [ALL SC 2018 September]