M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS [ ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- APPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION LAW IN ARBITRATION AIR 2008 SCW 4182 : JT 2008 (6) SC 22 : (2008) 6 SCALE 748 : (2008) 7 SCC 169 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Appellant Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS Respondent WITH Hatti Gold Mines Co. Ltd. Appellant Versus Vinay Heavy Equipments… Read More M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS [ ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

KEYWORDS:- UNREGISTERED DEED RATIO DECIDENDI : A document required to be registered is not admissible into evidence under Section 49 of the Registration Act. 2. Such unregistered document can however be used as an evidence of collateral purpose as provided in the Proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act. 3. A collateral transaction must… Read More M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Keywords:- Reservation for admission- The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC… Read More Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi)[ALL SC 2008 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-MURDER- CONVICTION-suspension of sentence pending appeal-BAIL DATE:-  12-05-2008. Initial presumption of innocence in favour of the accused, therefore, is no more available to the applicant. The mere fact that during the period of trial, the accused was on bail and there was no misuse of liberty, does not per se warrant suspension of execution of… Read More Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi)[ALL SC 2008 MAY]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS[ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-Reservation for admission in educational institutions- DATE : 10.04.2018 The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Ashoka Kumar Thakur Appellant Versus Union of India and OTHERS Respondent (Before : K.… Read More Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS[ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others[ALL SC 2008 December]

KEYWORDS:-non-filing of a replication-proving a will- DATE:-  03-12-2008. AIR 2009 SC 951 : (2008) 16 SCR 1117 : (2009) 1 SCC 354 : JT 2008 (13) SC 380 : (2008) 15 SCALE 551 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others Respondent (Before : Tarun Chatterjee And Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.) Civil… Read More K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others[ALL SC 2008 December]

Lalit Kumar Sharma and ANR Vs State of U. P. and ANR [SC 2008 May]

KEYWORDS:- Cheque issued towards the compromise of a Complaint bounced- If the cheque was issued in terms of the compromise, it did not create a new liability. As the compromise did not fructify, the same cannot be said to have been issued towards payment of debt. DATE:- 06-05-2008. Acts:- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Penal Code, 1860—Section… Read More Lalit Kumar Sharma and ANR Vs State of U. P. and ANR [SC 2008 May]

Johar and Ors Vs Mangal Prasad and Anr [SC 2008 January ]

KEYWORDS:- Revision by private person – Jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain revision against acquittal is not barred, but is severally restricted. The High Court, in its revisional power, would not, ordinarily, interfere with the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court unless there has been apparent error of law or procedure or… Read More Johar and Ors Vs Mangal Prasad and Anr [SC 2008 January ]

Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Vs Computer Joint India Ltd [ SC 2008 JULY ]

Keywords:-  Re-examination of the witnesses AIR 2008 SCW 6398 : (2008) CriLJ SC 4690 : (2008) 10 SCALE 648 : (2008) 11 SCC 108 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Appellant Versus Computer Joint India Ltd. Respondent The object underlying Section 311 of the Code is that there may not be failure of… Read More Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Vs Computer Joint India Ltd [ SC 2008 JULY ]