M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS [ ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:- APPLICABILITY OF LIMITATION LAW IN ARBITRATION AIR 2008 SCW 4182 : JT 2008 (6) SC 22 : (2008) 6 SCALE 748 : (2008) 7 SCC 169 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Appellant Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS Respondent WITH Hatti Gold Mines Co. Ltd. Appellant Versus Vinay Heavy Equipments … Continue reading M/s. Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Versus Principal Secretary, (Irrigation Department) and OTHERS [ ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

State of Punjab and ANOTHER Vs Jalour Singh and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 JANUARY ]

KEYWORDS:-Lok Adalat- AIR 2008 SC 1209 : (2008) 1 SCR 922 : (2008) 2 SCC 660 : JT 2008 (2) SC 83 : (2008) 2 SCALE 52 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of Punjab and ANOTHER Appellant Versus Jalour Singh and OTHERS Respondent (Before :  K. G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I., G. P. Mathur And R. V. … Continue reading State of Punjab and ANOTHER Vs Jalour Singh and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 JANUARY ]

M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

KEYWORDS:- UNREGISTERED DEED RATIO DECIDENDI : A document required to be registered is not admissible into evidence under Section 49 of the Registration Act. 2. Such unregistered document can however be used as an evidence of collateral purpose as provided in the Proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act. 3. A collateral transaction must … Continue reading M/s. K. B. Saha and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s. Development Consultant Ltd [ALL SC 2008 MAY]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Keywords:- Reservation for admission- The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC … Continue reading Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS [ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi)[ALL SC 2008 MAY]

KEYWORDS:-MURDER- CONVICTION-suspension of sentence pending appeal-BAIL DATE:-  12-05-2008. Initial presumption of innocence in favour of the accused, therefore, is no more available to the applicant. The mere fact that during the period of trial, the accused was on bail and there was no misuse of liberty, does not per se warrant suspension of execution of … Continue reading Sidhartha Vashisht alias Manu Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi)[ALL SC 2008 MAY]

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS[ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

KEYWORDS:-Reservation for admission in educational institutions- DATE : 10.04.2018 The Constitution 93rd Amendment Act, 2005, is valid AIR 2008 SCW 2899 : JT 2008 (5) SC 1 : (2008) 5 SCALE 1 : (2008) 6 SCC 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Ashoka Kumar Thakur Appellant Versus Union of India and OTHERS Respondent (Before : K. … Continue reading Ashoka Kumar Thakur Versus Union of India and OTHERS[ALL SC 2008 APRIL]

M. A. Rumugam Vs Kittu @ Krishnamoorthy[ALL SC 2008 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS-DEFAMATION-those who plead exception must prove it- DATE:- 07-11-2008 AIR 2009 SC 341 : (2008) 15 SCR 642 : (2009) 1 SCC 101 : JT 2008 (11) SC 638 : (2008) 14 SCALE 200 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) M. A. Rumugam Appellant Versus Kittu @ Krishnamoorthy Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Cyriac Joseph, JJ.) … Continue reading M. A. Rumugam Vs Kittu @ Krishnamoorthy[ALL SC 2008 NOVEMBER]

K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others[ALL SC 2008 December]

KEYWORDS:-non-filing of a replication-proving a will- DATE:-  03-12-2008. AIR 2009 SC 951 : (2008) 16 SCR 1117 : (2009) 1 SCC 354 : JT 2008 (13) SC 380 : (2008) 15 SCALE 551 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others Respondent (Before : Tarun Chatterjee And Mukundakam Sharma, JJ.) Civil … Continue reading K. Laxmanan Appellant Versus Thekkayil Padmini and Others[ALL SC 2008 December]

Lalit Kumar Sharma and ANR Vs State of U. P. and ANR [SC 2008 May]

KEYWORDS:- Cheque issued towards the compromise of a Complaint bounced- If the cheque was issued in terms of the compromise, it did not create a new liability. As the compromise did not fructify, the same cannot be said to have been issued towards payment of debt. DATE:- 06-05-2008. Acts:- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881—Section 138—Penal Code, 1860—Section … Continue reading Lalit Kumar Sharma and ANR Vs State of U. P. and ANR [SC 2008 May]

Johar and Ors Vs Mangal Prasad and Anr [SC 2008 January ]

KEYWORDS:- Revision by private person – Jurisdiction of the High Court to entertain revision against acquittal is not barred, but is severally restricted. The High Court, in its revisional power, would not, ordinarily, interfere with the judgment of acquittal passed by the trial court unless there has been apparent error of law or procedure or … Continue reading Johar and Ors Vs Mangal Prasad and Anr [SC 2008 January ]

Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Vs Computer Joint India Ltd [ SC 2008 JULY ]

Keywords:-  Re-examination of the witnesses AIR 2008 SCW 6398 : (2008) CriLJ SC 4690 : (2008) 10 SCALE 648 : (2008) 11 SCC 108 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Appellant Versus Computer Joint India Ltd. Respondent The object underlying Section 311 of the Code is that there may not be failure of … Continue reading Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. Vs Computer Joint India Ltd [ SC 2008 JULY ]

Hemaji Waghaji Jat Vs Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan and others [SC-2008]

KEYWORDS:-Adverse Possession- Plea of adverse possession is not a pure question of law but a blended one of fact and law. Therefore, a person who claims adverse possession should show : (a) on what date he came into possession, (b) what was the nature of his possession, (c) whether the factum of possession was known … Continue reading Hemaji Waghaji Jat Vs Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan and others [SC-2008]

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma [ ALL SC 2018 JULY]

KEYWORDS:- RAPE- Removal from service- disciplinary inquiry – natural Justice- The question as to whether Inquiry Officer who is supposed to act independently in an inquiry has acted as prosecutor or not is a question of fact which has to be decided on the facts and proceedings of particular case. The disciplinary proceedings are quasi-judicial proceedings … Continue reading Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ram Lakhan Sharma [ ALL SC 2018 JULY]

Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

AIR 2009 SC 3214 : (2009) 12 SCR 611 : JT 2009 (11) SC 516 : (2009) 10 SCALE 659 : (2009) CriLJ SC 4123 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Sarju alias Ramu Appellant Versus State of U. P. Respondent (Before : S. B. Sinha And Deepak Verma, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1446 of 2009 (arising … Continue reading Procedure and Procedural safeguards under NDPS Act must scrupulously be complied therewith.

Omprakash Vs. Laxminarayan & Ors[ALL SC 2013 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- Specific performance of contract -conveyance DATE:-OCTOBER 7, 2013 Section 33 of the Act casts a statutory obligation on all the authorities to impound a document. The court being an authority to receive a document in evidence is bound to give effect thereto. The unregistered deed of sale was an instrument which required payment of … Continue reading Omprakash Vs. Laxminarayan & Ors[ALL SC 2013 OCTOBER]

Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. Janardan Singh & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

KEYWORDS:-Special (Duty) Allowance- Equality before Law-Valid classification- DATE:- JULY 02, 2018 Article 14 does not prohibit reasonable classification but for passing test of permissible classification there are two conditions as observed in Budhan Choudhary versus State of Bihar must be satisfied. ACT:- Article 14 of Indian Constitution SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. … Continue reading Director General, CRPF & Ors. Vs. Janardan Singh & Ors. [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

Devidas Loka Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

KEYWORDS:- Murder- Acquittal- PLEA OF INSANITY- Right of Life- Benefit of Doubt- “We are therefore of the considered opinion, that the appellant has been able to create sufficient doubt in our mind that he is entitled to the benefit of the exception under section 84 I.P.C. because of the preponderance of his medical condition at … Continue reading Devidas Loka Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra [ALL SC 2018 JULY]

M/s. Geomysore Services India Pvt. Ltd. & ANR. Vs. M/s. Hutti Goldmines Company Ltd. & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

KEYWORDS:- Reservation of land The State Government being the owner of the land and minerals, has a right to make a proposal to the Central Government to reserve lands not held under a prospecting licence or mining lease for exploitation by the State Government companies or undertakings but approval of the Central Government is necessary; … Continue reading M/s. Geomysore Services India Pvt. Ltd. & ANR. Vs. M/s. Hutti Goldmines Company Ltd. & Ors.[ALL SC 2018 MAY]

National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

KEYWORDS:- SIT- WITNESS PROTECTION -FAIR TRIAL- COURT DIRECTIONS : (a) Ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts. (b) Providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) Relocation of witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF … Continue reading National Human Rights Commission vs State Of Gujarat & Ors [ALL SC 2009 MARCH ]

Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana If the information was received when the police officer was in the police station with sufficient time to take action, and if the police officer fails to record in writing the information received, or fails to send a copy thereof, to the official superior, then … Continue reading Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana [ALL SC 2012 DECEMBER] [Mandatory Compliance U/s 42 of the NDPS Act [Supreme Court Directions]

Tapas Biswas Vs. Shyama Prosad Ghosal [ALL HC CALCUTTA 2008 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- RENT CONTROL-INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION- JURISDICTION OF CIVIL COURT DATE: Nov-28-2008 ACTS:  Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 – Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 29, 38, 38(5), 39, 43 and 44 ALTERNATIVE CITATION : (2008)4CALLT455(HC) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT  Tapas Biswas Vs. Shyama Prosad Ghosal C.O. Nos. 2638 and 2640 of 2004, 3665 and 4311 of … Continue reading Tapas Biswas Vs. Shyama Prosad Ghosal [ALL HC CALCUTTA 2008 NOVEMBER]

Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- REVIEW PETITION – DEATH CONVICT- DATE:-2 September, 2014 A review petition filed by a convict whose death penalty is affirmed by this Court is required to be heard in open Court but cannot be decided by circulation. The right of a limited oral hearing in review petitions where death sentence is given, shall be … Continue reading Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq vs The Reg. Supreme Court Of India & Ors[ALL SC 2014 SEPTEMBER]

Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-Preliminary inquiry- DATE: 12 November, 2013- If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed or not. Since the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary is the record of all information received in a police … Continue reading Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors[ALL SC 2013 NOVEMBER]