SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Haryana If the information was received when the police officer was in the police station with sufficient time to take action, and if […]
Keywords :- Stop Payment – Mismatching signature- November 27, 2012- Heavy onus lies on the court issuing summons in such cases as the trial is summary in nature. The category of ‘stop […]
KEYWORDS:-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE A petition under the provisions of the PWD Act, 2005, is maintainable even if the acts of domestic violence had been committed prior to the coming into force of the […]
THE WEST BENGAL BACKWARD CLASSES (OTHER THAN SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES) (RESERVATION OF VACANCIES IN SERVICES AND POSTS) ACT, 2012.
Other Backward Classes” shall mean such classes of citizens as specified in Schedule I, other than Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and includes such classes as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify from time to time
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL LAW DEPARTMENT Legislative NOTIFICATION No. 533-L.—25th March, 2013.—The following Act of the West Bengal Legislature, having been assented to by the Governor, is hereby published for general information:— […]
Keyword : Remand- What is sought to be emphasized is that the disclosure of reasons by the magistrate allowing police remand specially in a matter when the accused has been enlarged on […]
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous
Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and
Dangerous Persons Act, 1981
Whether a statute authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.
In case of the partition suit, all the parties are to be treated as plaintiffs. Even if any preliminary decree would have been passed by this court in this suit based on the said affidavit dated 15th October, 1985 under Order 20 Rule 18 read with sections 151 to 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, court has ample power to pass more than one preliminary decree or to modify the preliminary decree prior to passing of the final decree having regard to change of supervening circumstances.
A person aggrieved by the order of a Tribunal can challenge the findings by a writ petition before High Court: SC on Assam Citizenship Case
MAY 17, 2019.-Abdul Kuddus Vs. Union of India and Others – where the issue and question of nationality has already been determined under the 1964 Order, an appeal would not be maintainable under paragraph 8 of the Schedule to the 2003 Rules. The determination would be final and binding on the Registering Authority under the Schedule and the Local Registrar. Paragraph 8 does not envisage and provide for a second round of litigation before the same authority i.e. the Foreigners Tribunal constituted under the 1964 Order on and after preparation of the final list. Provisions of paragraph 8 of the Schedule to the 2003 Rules will apply when there has not been an earlier adjudication and decision by the Foreigners Tribunal.
The scope of interference in the matter of policy framed by the Government by courts is well settled. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in (2001) 3 SCC 635 (Ugar […]
Pocso Act 2012 S 31. Application of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to proceedings before a Special Court: Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the provisions of the Code of Criminal […]
School violence has been a persistent problem in the United States. For example, on January 29, 1979, a 16-year-old opened fire on Grover Cleveland Elementary School in San Diego, CA. She killed two adults […]
Vehicle cannot be confiscated merely on accusation of commission of offence, by invoking Section 451 of Cr.P.C. said vehicle can be released
The vehicles seized under Section 50 from alleged offender cannot become property of State unless there is trial and finding reached by competent court that property seized was used for committing the […]
Order XII Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure shows power under above provision is discretionary and cannot be claimed as a matter of right
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FULL BENCH ( Before : T.S. Thakur, J; V. Gopala Gowda, J; R. Banumathi, J ) S.M. ASIF — Appellant Vs. VIRENDER KUMAR BAJAJ — Respondent Civil Appeal […]
Death penalty Commuted to LI for non-availability of exceptionally heinous condition- “We find that a sentence of life imprisonment simpliciter would be inadequate for the appellant Swapan Kumar, as that includes the […]
MURDER-Acquittal of the accused. DATE: October 26, 2018. ACT: Section 148/149 read with Section 302 IPC SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Ramvir Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No. 183 of 2013] Abhay Manohar […]
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA Vs. CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE OF ARTISTS AND TECHNICIANS OF W.B. FILM AND TELEVISION [ALL SC 2017 MARCH]
While identifying the relevant market in a given case, the CCI is required to look at evidence that is available and relevant to the case at hand. The CCI has to define […]
The apex court’s five-judge Constitution bench was unanimous in striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code dealing with the offence of adultery, holding it as manifestly arbitrary, archaic and violative of the rights to equality and equal opportunity to women
Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. Vs. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice [ALL SC 2018 September]
September 6, 2018:-SECTION 377of IPC-Homosexuality-It is declared that insofar as Section 377 criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults (i.e. persons above the age of 18 years who are competent to consent) in […]