STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

A number of judgments have been cited including the celebrated Supreme Court judgment in Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India & Another, 1998 (4) SCC 409, in which a Constitution Bench of this Court held that Article 142 cannot authorize the Court to ignore the substantive rights of a litigant while dealing with the cause pending before it and cannot be used to supplant the substantive law applicable to the cause before this Court. A large number of other judgments following this judgment were also cited. … Read More STATE (THROUGH) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. SHRI KALYAN SINGH (FORMER CM OF UP)[ALL SC 2017 APRIL]

Union of India Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors.[ALL SC 2017 August ]

The precise origin of the game of cricket, though largely unknown, has been traced, at least, to late 15th Century England. With the expansion of British Empire the game of cricket travelled to different parts of the globe including India. Today, if there has to be a national game in India, cricket would certainly be a front-runner. … Read More Union of India Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors.[ALL SC 2017 August ]

Pankajbhai Rameshbhai vs Jethabhai Kalabhai Zalavadiya[ALL SC 2017 OCTOBER]

KEYWORDS:- Impleadment of Party- Mentioning wrong provision- DATE:- 3 October, 2017 It is by now well settled that a mere wrong mention of the provision in the application would not prohibit a party to the litigation from getting justice there is no bar for filing the application under Order 1 Rule 10, even when the… Read More Pankajbhai Rameshbhai vs Jethabhai Kalabhai Zalavadiya[ALL SC 2017 OCTOBER]

Madan Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.[SC 2017 December]

KEYWORDS:-  DE FACTO COMPLAINANT -SESSIONS JUDGE ALLOWED APPLICATION U/S 193 Cr.P.C DATE: December 14, 2017 The De-Facto complainant  filed an application under Section 193 of the Code in the Sessions Trial complaining therein that the names of respondent Nos.2 and 3 – Ashish Meena and Vimal Meena though figured prominently in all the material documents filed… Read More Madan Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.[SC 2017 December]

Dr. Sabu Mathew George Vs. Union of India and Others [SC 2017 December]

KEYWORDS: PIL-SEX SELECTION- Exposer to internet- DATE : December 13, 2017- Many are guided by inappropriate exposure to the internet. The respondents have a role to control it and if any concrete suggestion is given by the petitioner, the same shall be incorporated. We command Google India, Yahoo ! India and Microsoft Corporation (I) Pvt.… Read More Dr. Sabu Mathew George Vs. Union of India and Others [SC 2017 December]

Manish Kathuria and Others Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and Others Etc[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-  Article 142 OF CONSTITUTION- COMPLETE JUSTICE-principle of horizontal reservation- DATE:- DECEMBER 13, 2017- We also make it clear that this judgment is rendered in the peculiar facts of this case and it should not be quoted as a precedent. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Manish Kathuria and Others Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and Others Etc.… Read More Manish Kathuria and Others Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and Others Etc[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

S. Esabella Vs. C. Thankarajan [SC 2017 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- PARTITION CASE-impracticability of partitioning- DATE:-DECEMBER 12, 2017 Appellant, having not challenged the preliminary decree, may challenge the final decree in Partition case  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA S. Esabella Vs. C. Thankarajan [Civil Appeal No(S). 21804-21805/2017 arising from SLP (C) Nos.7476-7477 of 2015] KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant has approached this Court… Read More S. Esabella Vs. C. Thankarajan [SC 2017 DECEMBER]

Malik Industry & ANR. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:- ACQUISITION OF LAND- DATE:-DECEMBER 12, 2017- The land acquisition proceedings initiated against the appellants stand lapsed. However, the respondents are given the opportunity to initiate proceedings afresh under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, within a period of six months from today. ACT:-Section 24(2) of… Read More Malik Industry & ANR. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

Sudama Singh & Ors. Etc. Vs. Deepak Mohan Spolia & Ors. Etc[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:Contempt of Courts Act- DATE:-DECEMBER 12, 2017- “The High Court went wrong in referring only to paragraph 62 of the judgment and not to the other relevant considerations leading to the decision which are contained in the judgment itself, which we have extracted above. The whole purpose of paragraph 62 of the judgment is to… Read More Sudama Singh & Ors. Etc. Vs. Deepak Mohan Spolia & Ors. Etc[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India Vs. Union of India and Ors.[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

KEYWORDS:-HOTEL- DATE:-December 12, 2017- Neither the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 read with the enactment of 1985, or the Legal Metrology Act, 2009, would apply so as to interdict the sale of mineral water in hotels and restaurants at prices which are above the MRP. ACTS :-Weights and Measures Act, 1976 read with… Read More Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Associations of India Vs. Union of India and Ors.[SC 2017 DECEMBER]

Bharatsing S/o. Gulabsingh Jakhad & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.[SC 2017 December]

KEYWORDS:-LAND ACQUISITION- Compensation- DATE:- DECEMBER 12, 2017- As soon as the award of the civil court is carried in appeal, it becomes obligatory for the Collector to keep the application/applications for redetermination of compensation filed within limitation pending, awaiting decision by the appellate forum and to redetermine the compensation on the basis of the final judgment… Read More Bharatsing S/o. Gulabsingh Jakhad & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.[SC 2017 December]

Mr. Ranvir Dewan Vs. Mrs. Rashmi Khanna & ANR.[SC 2017 December]

KEYWORDS:- Suit -life interest- will-succession-Mitakshara Law- DATE : December 12, 2017- When a Hindu male could testamentarily dispose of his property. When he does that, a succession under the Act stands excluded and the property passes to the testamentary heirs. Hence, when a male Hindu executes a will bequeathing the properties, the legatees take it… Read More Mr. Ranvir Dewan Vs. Mrs. Rashmi Khanna & ANR.[SC 2017 December]