OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE PROTECTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005

DV act applies to  Only the victim of the violence all women who are subject of 125 Cr.P.C All women who are not staying with the husband women who are victim of violence within the family Aggrieved Person includes woman having domestic relationship A woman in live- in relations a mother whom the son not … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE PROTECTION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON LIMITATION ACT, 1963

Application includes Writ Petition Interlocutory application Petition for restoration of suit Above all Suit does not include an appeal or an application in Limitation Act  True False Cannot be said Not a subject matter of limitation act  The Limitation Act, 1963 applies to proceedings before courts Suit before courts Suit and Proceeding Both all the … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON LIMITATION ACT, 1963

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT [1ST SET]

Readiness of plaintiff to perform contract which includes (a) performance of plaintiff (b) potential of plaintiff (c) willingness of plaintiff (d) financial ability of plaintiff. Where applicant neither necessary nor proper party in suit of specific performance whether his presence is necessary for effective adjudication? (a) yes (b) no (c) conditional one (d) none of … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT [1ST SET]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT 1882 [1ST SET]

1. Before the commencement of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the transfer of immovable properties in India were governed by the (a) principles of English law and equity (b) Indian Registration Act, 1908 (c) British State of Goods Act, 1880 (d) Indian Contract Act, 1872. 2. The courts, before the enactment of the Transfer … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT 1882 [1ST SET]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE INDIAN PENAL CODE[1ST SET ]

1. The Fundamental principle of criminal liability is embodied in the maxim “actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea”. The maxim was developed by: (a) Equity Courts (b) Common Law Courts (c) Sadar Nizamat Court (d) none of the above. 2. ‘Wrongful gain’ means (a) gain by lawful means of property which the person … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE INDIAN PENAL CODE[1ST SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT [1ST SET ]

Indian Evidence Act was drafted by (a) Lord Macaulay (b) Sir James F. Stephen (c) Huxley (d) Sir Henry Summer Maine. The law of evidence consists of (a) ordinary rules of reasoning (b) legal rules of evidence (c) rules of logic (d) all the above. Relevancy and admissibility under the Indian Evidence Act are (a) … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT [1ST SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [3RD SET ]

A 1. Point out incorrect response under Cr. P.C.– (a) Inquiry is conducted by the Court (b) Inquiry is conducted after framing of charge (c) Inquiry is conducted prior of framing of charge (d) Inquiry is conducted by the Magistrate (Ans : b) 2. In a cognizable offence a police officer (a) Cannot arrest an … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [3RD SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [2ND SET ]

1. As per the Explanation to Section 2(d) of the Cr.PC, a report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a ________ . Answer: Complaint. 2. __________ includes all the proceedings under the Cr.PC for the collection of evidence … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [2ND SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [1ST SET ]

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 1. Section 2 in Cr.P.C. defining “victim” as a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged includes (a) victim’s guardian (b) victim’s guardian or legal heir (c) victim’s neighbour (d) victim’s close … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [1ST SET ]

OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 [2nd SET]

Under the provisions of Civil Procedure Code plea of adverse possession is a defence available (a) only to plaintiff against defendant (b) only to defendant against plaintiff (c) both plaintiff and defendant (d) only to movable property. The reappreciation of evidence in second appeal (a) is subject to review (b) is permissible (c) is not … Continue reading OBJECTIVE SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 [2nd SET]

Objective sample questions on The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [1st Set]

Unsolved Under the provisions of Civil Procedure Code plea of adverse possession is a defence available (a) only to plaintiff against defendant (b) only to defendant against plaintiff (c) both plaintiff and defendant (d) only to movable property. The reappreciation of evidence in second appeal (a) is subject to review (b) is permissible (c) is … Continue reading Objective sample questions on The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [1st Set]

HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [5th Set]

Tender is— (A) An offer (B) An invitation to offer (C) A counter offer (D) A promise Ans:-B 2. A contract is not frustrated— (A) By commercial impossibility (B) By imposition of government restriction or order (C) By destruction of subject-matter of contract (D) By death or incapability of party when contract is of the … Continue reading HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [5th Set]

HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [4th Set]

1. Consider the following statements: 1. The Preamble of the Constitution of India can be amended by the Parliament up to any extent barring the basic features. 2. The Preamble can be amended only by special majority and ratification by legislatures of 1 (half) the States. 3. The Preamble has no role to play in … Continue reading HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [4th Set]

HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [3rd Set]

‘A’ intentionally fired a shot from his pistol at ‘B’ but it hit ‘C’ and ‘C’ died. The offence committed by ‘A’ is— (A) Attempt to murder (B)Culpable homicide (C)Murder under Section 300 (D)Murder under Section 301 Ans:-D ‘A’ makes a false entry in his electronic record for the purpose of using it as corroborative … Continue reading HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [3rd Set]

HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [2nd Set]

1. An executing court cannot determine the questions relating to which of the following? (A) Execution of decree (B) Discharge of decree (C) Satisfaction of decree (D) Modification of decree Ans:-D 2. A person against whom summons has been issued may be compelled under Sec. 32 of C.P.C. to attend by— 1. Issue of a … Continue reading HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICE MODEL OBJECTIVE QUESTION PAPER [2nd Set]

Higher Judicial Service Model Objective Question Paper [ 1st Set]

1. Objection as to place of suing shall be allowed in the Court of first instance is the essence of— (A) Section-21 A of C.P.C. (B) Section-20 of C.P.C. (C) Section-22 of C.P.C. (D) Section-21 of C.P.C. Ans:-D 2. What type of officer is a SHO? (A) A General Officer (B) Officer incharge (C) Deputy … Continue reading Higher Judicial Service Model Objective Question Paper [ 1st Set]

State of Rajasthan Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta [All SC 2011 December]

KEYWORDS:-Murder acquittal (2011) 13 SCALE 140 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of Rajasthan Appellant Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta Respondent (Before : Swatanter Kumar and Ranjana Prakash Desai, JJ.) Criminal Appeal No. 1502 of 2005 : Decided On: 01-12-2011 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 374 and 378—Appeal—There is very thin but fine distinction between appeal … Continue reading State of Rajasthan Versus Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta [All SC 2011 December]

Supreme Court may declare that Section 377 violated the right of sex under Article 21 of the LGBTQ community – Govt posed Stoic silence !

JULY 17, 2018 16:27 IST CHIEF JUSTICE’S COURT W.P.(C) No. 373/2006 PIL-W INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS. R. P. GUPTA Versus THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS CONSTITUTION BENCH COMPRISING HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HONBLE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HONBLE A.M. KHANWILKAR, HONBLE DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND HONBLE INDU MALHOTRA, JJ. While reserving the Judgment by Supreme … Continue reading Supreme Court may declare that Section 377 violated the right of sex under Article 21 of the LGBTQ community – Govt posed Stoic silence !

Basic Law of Governance [ Constitution of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]

Basic Law of Governance The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Fahd Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud issued a Royal Decree embodying the Basic Law of Governance. The following is the text of the Decree. In the name of God, the most compassionate, the most Merciful. No: A/90 Dated 27th Sha’ban 1412 H (1 March 1992) … Continue reading Basic Law of Governance [ Constitution of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia]

Laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Law of the Kingdom can safely be divided into two groups. Basic Laws, which has a Constitution like effect or other Laws. In 1992 the Basic Laws were adopted by a Royal Decree.  Basic Laws  Media, Culture and Publication Laws National Security, Civil Status and Criminal Laws Commerce, Economy and Investment Laws Diplomatic Corps, Protocol, … Continue reading Laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another [ ALL SC 1996 MARCH ]

AIR 1996 SC 3121 : (1996) 3 SCR 857 : (1996) 8 SCC 470 : JT 1996 (3) SC 446 : (1996) 3 SCALE 89 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another Respondent (Before: B. P. Jeevan Reddy, S. C. Sen And … Continue reading Most Rev. P. M. A. Metropolitan and others Versus Moran Mar marthoma Mathews and another [ ALL SC 1996 MARCH ]

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

AIR 1995 SC 2001 : (1995) 1 Suppl. SCR 542 : (1995) 4 Suppl. SCC 286 : JT 1995 (5) SC 1 : (1995) 4 SCALE 1 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Appellant Versus Moran Mar marthoma and another Respondent (Before: R. M. Sahai, B. P. Jeevan Reddy And S. … Continue reading Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and others Vs Moran Mar marthoma and another [ALL SC 1995 JUNE]

State of Bombay Vs Kathi Kalu Oghad [ALL SC 1961 AUGUST]

KEYWORDS: 11 JUDGES BENCH- testimonial compulsion AIR 1961 SC 1808 : (1962) 2 SCR 10 : (1961) 2 CriLJ SC 856 (SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) State of Bombay Appellant Versus Kathi Kalu Oghad Respondent With Criminal Appeals Nos. 110 and 111 of 1958 Pokhar Singh (In both the Appeals) Appellant Versus State of Punjab (in both … Continue reading State of Bombay Vs Kathi Kalu Oghad [ALL SC 1961 AUGUST]