No Sabarimala entry for women after reference to seven judges Bench by Supreme Court
With the reference of Sabarimala case to a larger bench status of women entry in sanctum automatically stayed
Advocatetanmoy
Advocate, adviser and educator
Church and Religion
Avatar- Intervention by Hindu supreme Being in a cosmic catastrophe or restoration of creation in its pure form. Abecedarian – A 16th-century sect of Anabaptists centered in Germany who had an absolute disdain […]
Criticising Supreme Court Judgment
Bona fide criticism of a judgment, albeit of the highest court of the land, is certainly permissible, but thwarting, or encouraging persons to thwart, the directions or orders of the highest court cannot be countenanced in our Constitutional scheme of things.
ALL News Headlines 2019 November 13TH
The Supreme Court on Thursday said a seven-judge bench will re-examine various religious issues, including the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple and mosques and the practice of female genital mutilation in the Dawoodi Bohra community.
SC dismisses Rafale review petitions said perception of individuals cannot be basis of a fishing and roving enquiry- 14/11/2019
Yashwant Sinha & Ors. Vs Central Bureau Of Investigation through its Director & Anr-We find no reason for any intervention by this Court on the sensitive issue of purchase of 36 defence aircrafts by the Indian Government. Perception of individuals cannot be the basis of a fishing and roving enquiry by this Court, especially in such matters. We, thus, dismiss all the writ petitions.
Sabarimala review petitions referred to Seven Judges bench by SC Read full judgment – 14/09/2019
Kantaru Rajeevaru Vs Indian Young Lawyers Association Thr. its General Secretary And Ors-The decision of the Seven Judges bench of this Court in Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras vs. Shri Lakshmindra Tirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt (Shirur Mutt) (1954) SCR 1005 holding that what are essential religious practices of a particular religious denomination should be left to be determined by the denomination itself and the subsequent view of a Five Judges bench in Durgah Committee, Ajmer vs. Syed Hussain Ali & Ors. (1962) 1 SCR 383 carving out a role for the court in this regard to exclude what the courts determine to be secular practices or superstitious beliefs seem to be in apparent conflict requiring consideration by a larger Bench.
Vimukt Jatis (Denotified Tribes) in Haryana
List of Vimukt Jatis (Denotified Tribes) and the category
BACKWARD CLASSES IN HARYANA
LIST OF BACKWARD CLASSES IN HARYANA STATE
Schedule castes in Haryana
LIST OF SCHEDULED CASTES IN HARYANA STATE Ad Dharmi Aheria, Aheri, Hari, Heri, Thori, Turi Balmiki Bangali Barar, Burar, Berar Batwal, Barwala 6. Bauria, Bawaria Bazigar Bhanjra Chamar, Jatia Chamar, Rehgar, Ra […]
Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act: SC
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA VS SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL 13/11/2019-Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act: SC
H.V.P.N.L. Vs Mahavir-21/07/2000
The Appellate Forum is bound to refer to the pleadings of the case, the submissions of the counsel, necessary points for consideration, discuss the evidence and dispose of the matter by giving valid reasons.
Supreme Court observations on disqualified Karnataka MLAs Case
In the earlier Constitution Bench judgment of Kihoto Hollohan (supra), the order of the Speaker under Tenth Schedule can be subject to judicial review on four grounds: mala fide, perversity, violation of the constitutional mandate and order passed in violation of natural justice.
ALL News Headlines 2019 November 13TH
MOON: The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Wednesday released a fresh 3-D photo of an impact crater on the moon’s surface captured by the Chandrayaan-2. AADHAR FOR MIGRANT: The government has allowed […]
Absolute enactment Vs directory enactment.
When a statute is passed for the purpose of enabling something to be done, and prescribed the way in which it is to be done, it may be either an absolute enactment […]
Shashikant Singh v. Tarkeshwar Singh and Anr-24/04/2002
When a statute is passed for the purpose of enabling something to be done, and prescribes the way in which it is to be done, it may be either an absolute enactment or a directory enactment. The difference being that an absolute enactment must be obeyed or fulfilled exactly, but it is sufficient if a directory enactment be obeyed or fulfilled substantially.
