Criminal Defamation – Advocatetanmoy Law Library

In re: Arundhati Roy – 06/03/2002

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon September 5, 2019September 5, 2019in Contempt Of Court, Criminal Defamation, Supreme Court Judgments

As the respondent has not shown any repentance or regret or remorse, no leinent view should be taken in the matter. However, showing the magnanimity of law by keeping in mind that the respondent is a woman, and hoping that better sense and wisdom shall dawn upon the respondent in the future to serve the cause of art and literature by her creative skill and imagination, we feel that the ends of justice would be met if she is sentenced to symbolic imprisonment besides paying a fine of ` 2000/-.

AROON PURIE AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon May 18, 2019May 18, 2019in Criminal Defamation

An article has to be read in its entirety and an isolated passage cannot be read out of context. The Court is cast with a duty to decide what impression the article would produce on the mind of an unprejudiced…

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Arjun Gopal vs Union Of India-29/10/2021

On Diwali days or on any other festivals like Gurupurab, etc., when such fireworks generally take place, it would strictly be from 8.00 p.m. till 10.00 p.m. only. On Christmas eve and New Year’s eve, when such fireworks start around midnight i.e. 12.00 a.m., it would be from 11.55 p.m. till 12.30 a.m. only.

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. Union of India and Ors-27/10/2021

Pegasus suite of spywares-we constitute a Technical Committee comprising of three members, including those who are experts in cyber security, digital forensics, networks and hardware, whose functioning will be overseen by Justice R.V. Raveendran,

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr-29/09/2021

GRANTING BAIL-The issue of bail is one of liberty, justice, public safety and burden of the public treasury, all of which insist that a developed jurisprudence of bail is integral to a socially sensitised judicial process

Vishwabandhu Vs. Sri Krishna and Anr-29/09/2021

MONEY SUIT-Ex Party Decree-Execution-Notice- when a notice is sent by registered post and is returned with a postal endorsement “refused” or “not available in the house” or “house locked” or “shop closed” or “addressee not in station”, due service has to be presumed.