Revised as at 1st January, 2019 Proceeds of Crime Law 2019 CAYMAN ISLANDS
It was found that the respondents had violated the provisions under Sections 3(2), 5 and 29 of the PC and PNDT Act which is punishable under Sections 23 and 25 of the said Act. For violation of PC and PNDT Act and Rule, the authorized officer of the Collector-cum-District Appropriate Authority, Dhenkanal, seized the ultrasound machine and other equipments from the said clinic. For such violation, the registration of ultrasound clinic of the respondents has been suspended vide order of the Collector dated 18.06.2014. A complaint was filed against the accused-respondent under Section 28(2) of the PC and PNDT Act. The Trial Court took cognizance of offences punishable under Sections 3(2), 5, 29, 23 and 25 of the PC and PNDT Act and issued summons to the respondents.
Sheffield Crown Court-No sentence I impose can bring Stanley back. No sentence I impose can undo what you have done and heal the rifts in your family. All I can do is impose what the law considers to be the appropriate sentence for a case of this nature. I do that by following the guidelines for sentencing in cases of manslaughter.
ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 154/2019 […]
Calcutta High Court declined to allow any major action against the errant police officers apart from appointing one man Commission to inquire the Howrah Court Violence and directed home department not to assigned any official work which may influence the inquiry.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy 35th President of the United States May 29, 1917-November 22, 1963 President John F. Kennedy died on 22 November 1963. 1300 PM Autopsy Report of President John F. Kennedy […]
(1967) AIR(Bombay) 96 : (1966) 68 BomLR 321 : (1967) CriLJ 427 : (1966) ILR(Bombay) 839 BOMBAY HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH ( Before : Palekar, J; Naik, J ) GAJANAN VISHWANATH KETKAR […]
BOMBAY HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH ( Before : Palekar, J; Naik, J ) ANANT JANARDHAN KARANDIKAR — Appellant Vs. STATE — Respondent Decided on : 02-08-1965 Constitution of India, 1950 – Article […]
The Magistrate has been given an undoubted discretion in the matter and the discretion has to be judicially exercised by him. Once the Magistrate has exercised his discretion it is not for the High Court or even the Supreme Court, to substitute its own discretion for that of the Magistrate or to examine the case on merits with a view to find out whether or not the allegations in the complaint, if proved, would ultimately end in conviction of the accused. These considerations are totally foreign to the scope and ambit of an inquiry u/s 202 which culminates into an order u/s 204.
Supreme Court withdrew protection given to Mr. Rajeev Kumar, former Commissioner of Police, Kolkata, vide order dated February 05, 2019 restraining the CBI from arresting him and thereby
Supreme Court in Union of India (UOI) Vs. Prafulla Kumar Samal and Another, and Dilawar Balu Kurane Vs. State of Maharashtra, held.. In Prafulla Kumar Samal (supra), the scope of Section 227 […]
A. Crime Against Women – related Acts B. Crime Against Children – related Act C. Crime Against Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes – related Acts D. Offences against State – related Acts […]
The basic ingredients of the offence of criminal conspiracy are: (i) an agreement between two or more persons; (ii) the agreement must relate to doing or causing to be done either (a) […]
Process was not issued against the opposite parties under any of the penal provision of the Act nor was any prayer made for issue of summons under any section of the Act […]
West Bengal Act 9 of 1972 [4th May, 1972.] Assent of the President was first published in the Calcutta Gazette, Extraordinary, of the 4th May, 1972. An Act to provide for special […]
Magistrates should not call police officers to their Courts if not required, only to show their power: DHC
03-10-2007 -COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND OTHERS Vs. MANOJ SHARMA AND ANOTHER – An unlawful assembly is unlawful assembly irrespective of the fact whether the people have assembled for a good cause or a bad cause. Neither there is a golden scale of quantum of force to be used, nor such a yardstick can be laid down by the Courts. The quantum of force to be used has to be determined by the officer concerned, the Court cannot substitute its own opinion or decision about the quantum of force which should have been used – DHC