Law of Afganistan – Advocatetanmoy Law Library

Taliban announced members of “acting” govt, Mohammad Hasan Akhund as PM & Abdul Ghani Baradar deputy Afghan leader.

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon September 7, 2021September 7, 2021in Law of Afganistan

Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid on Tuesday announced members of the "acting" government, saying that it will be led by Mohammad Hasan Akhund while the group's co-founder Abdul Ghani Baradar will be the deputy Afghan leader.

Constitution of Islamic Republic of Afghanistan-2004

Posted by Advocatetanmoyon May 3, 2020September 22, 2021in CIVIL, Law of Afganistan

Afghanistan shall be an Islamic Republic, independent, unitary and indivisible state. The sacred religion of Islam is the religion of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. Followers of other faiths shall be free within the bounds of law in the exercise and performance of their religious rituals.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Harjit Singh Vs. Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and Anr – 24/08/2021

Apex Court does not interfere with Bail order of HC. But, where the discretion of HC to grant bail has been exercised without due application of mind or in contravention of directions of apex Court, granting bail is liable to be set aside.

Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors – 19/08/2021

It is made clear that person is entitled to claim benefit of reservation in either of the successor State of Bihar or State of Jharkhand, but will not be entitled to claim benefit simultaneously

Madhav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh-18/08/2021

It happens at times that the real culprit lodges the first information against known or unknown persons, to misdirect the investigation of an offence

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. Dr. Ram Naresh Sharma & Ors-03/08/2021

The doctors, both under AYUSH and CHS, render service to patients and on this core aspect, there is nothing to distinguish them.

Rajinder Goel Vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Anr-02/08/2021

Petition REJECTED under Article 32 of the Constitution and since a remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution was available to him for getting remedy

Neeraj Garg Vs. Sarita Rani and Ors. Etc-02/08/2021

Expunging certain observations made against the LAWYER by the learned Judge of the High Court while deciding four cases

State of Kerala Vs. K. Ajith & Ors-28/07/21

CJM declining to grant permission to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw the prosecution. An application for withdrawal of prosecution under Section 321 of the CrPC. It is not the duty of this Court, in an application under Section 321 of the CrPC, to adjudicate upon evidentiary issues and examine the admissibility or sufficiency of evidence.

Lakshman Singh Vs. State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)-23/07/21

Production of an injury report for the offence under Section 323 IPC is not a sine qua non for establishing the case for the offence under Section 323 IPC. Section 323 IPC is a punishable section for voluntarily causing hurt. “Hurt” is defined under Section 319 IPC.

READ MORE