RULES REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Category: Supreme Court
Few judicial pronouncements gave a distinct impression of an overreach-VP of India
Higher judiciary deciding on Diwali fireworks, banning of use vehicles of certain make after 10 or 15 years, monitoring police investigations, denying the executive any role in the appointment of judges through collegiums, invalidating the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act seeking to enforce accountability and transparencyetc were some instances referred to by Shri Naidu as being perceived as instances of judicial overreach.
Judgments passed by Indian Supreme Court in the month of January – 2021
For the month of January 2021 1Case NumberW.P.(C) No.-000026 / 202019-01-2021 Petitioner NameMANISH KUMARRespondent NameUNION OF INDIAPetitioner's AdvocateVAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVABenchHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIJudgment ByHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH2Case NumberR.P.(C)…
Read More Judgments passed by Indian Supreme Court in the month of January – 2021
Whether an AOR can style his name as a AOR proprietary firm for carrying on profession- SC said yes
whether an Advocate on Record can have entry in Advocate On Record register in the form of his style of carrying on profession i.e. instead of “Siddharth Murarka” as “Law Chambers of Siddharth Murarka”?.
Judgments passed by Indian Supreme Court in the year of 2020
S.No. 1Diary Number12 / 2019Case NumberCrl.A. No.-000353-000353 / 202002-03-2020 (English)Petitioner NameSATISHKUMAR NYALCHAND SHAHRespondent NameTHE STATE OF GUJARATPetitioner's AdvocateSUMITA RAYRespondent's AdvocateBenchHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAHJudgment ByHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAHS.No. 2Diary Number14 / 2018Case NumberC.A. No.-002528-002529 /…
Read More Judgments passed by Indian Supreme Court in the year of 2020
Macaulay suggested enhancing the power of Supreme Court in India
Supreme Court has never been so mischievous as during the first ten years of its power, or so respectable as it has lately been. Everybody who knows anything of its early history knows, that, during a considerable time, it was the terror of Bengal, the scourge of the native population, the screen of European delinquents, a convenient tool of the Government for all purposes of evil, an insurmountable obstacle to the Government in all undertakings for the public good
Whether an applicant is competent to move HC with a review petition in case of SLP rejected by a Non-speaking Order
A petition for leave to appeal to this Court may be dismissed by a non-speaking order or by a speaking order. Whatever be the phraseology employed in the order of dismissal, if it is non-speaking order, i.e. it does not assign reasons for dismissing the special leave petition, it would neither attract the doctrine of merger so as to stand substituted in place of the order put in issue before it nor would it be a declaration of law by the Supreme Court under Article 141 of the Constitution for there is no law which has been declared.
Without exploring alternative SC canceled Jagannath Rath Jatra 2020: Black day in Hindu History
The Virtual(Computer programmed) Court headed by CJI, SA Bobde along with Justice Dinesh Maheswari and Justice A.S Bopanna while listening to a PIL filed by a Hindu hater NGO, Odisha Vikash Parishad passed a blanket injunction on Puri annual Rath Jatra taking a plea of COVID pandemic. The matter shall be listed after 4 weeks from today.
TRIAL OF THE REV. JAMES LONG, OF THE CHURCH MISSONARY SOCIETY FOR LIBEL-1861
My duty is a distressing one, but I must not shrink from the performance of it. The sentence of the Court is that you pay a fine of Rs. 1000 to our Sovereign Lady the Queen, and that you be imprisoned in the Common Jail for the period of one calendar month, and that you be further imprisoned until the fine is paid.
SC GUIDELINES FOR COURT FUNCTIONING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING DURING COVID-19
2020.04.06-SUO MOTU WRIT (CIVIL) NO.5/2020- Supreme Court held that the term ‘evidence’ includes electronic evidence and that video conferencing may be used to record evidence. It observed that developments in technology have opened up the possibility of virtual courts which are similar to physical courts. Taking cognizance of the measures adopted by this court and by the High Courts and District Courts, it is necessary for this court to issue directions by taking recourse to the jurisdiction conferred by Article 142 of the Constitution.
Knowing Ranjan Gogoi- the son of Ex Congress Chief minister of Assam
CJI Gogoi has had a long and dynamic career since the time he was enrolled as a lawyer in the bar council in 1978. He was made the permanent judge of the Gauhati High Court on February 28, 2001.
THE SUPREME COURT RULES 1966
In exercise of the powers conferred by Article 145 of the Constitution, and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the Supreme Court hereby makes, with the approval of the President, the following rules
Advocatetanmoy Law Library 