It is not for the Courts to examine the relative merits of different policies, and consider whether a wiser or better one can be evolved. Nor are Courts inclined to strike down a policy merely because it is urged that a different policy would have been fairer or wiser or more scientific or more logical.
May 8, 2019: The Ministry of Law and justice returned the names of the two Hich Court Judges due to lack of seniority. The Collegium on April 12, 2019, recommended the names of the Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice A.S. Bopanna for their elevation to the Supreme Court after considering their “merit and integrity, combined seniority on all-India basis of Chief Justices and senior puisne Judges of High Courts”. It is understood that the Collegium already considered the seniority, therefore the Collegium may recommend the names again for the second time.
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CODE NOMENCLATURE OF INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION 1 GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF 2 VACATING STAY 3 EARLY HEARING APPLICATION 5 INTERVENTION APPLICATION 6 ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES 7 […]
Statutory appeals as provided by Special Acts : (i) Section 35 (L) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944); (ii) Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (43 of […]
Under The Supreme Court Rules 2009 Hearing in open court 27.(1) Every contested appeal shall be heard in open court except where it is necessary in the interests of justice or in the […]
Supreme Court[ created by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005] of the United Kingdom is the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern […]
Index Search [1950 – 2018] Headnotes of 2018 SC Judgments [MAY 2019] Maharashtra Archery Association Vs. Rahul Mehra and Ors.– Sports Law – The decision of Apex Court in Board of Control for […]
Constitutional provisions Supreme Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir.- (1) There shall be constituted a Supreme Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir to be the highest Court of appeal, (2) Subject to the provisions […]
17-12-2008 Key Words:- Additional judge-Permanent judge-Judicial review⇒ A person who is not found suitable for being appointed as a permanent Judge, should not be given extension as an Additional Judge unless the […]
On the 28th of January, 1950 Supreme Court came in to being. After its inauguration on January 28, 1950, the Supreme Court commenced its sittings in a part of the Parliament House. […]
REVISED NORMS FOR ACCREDITATION OF THE LEGAL CORRESPONDENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (Dated 03-01-2007) 1. He must have a Law degree recognized by the Bar Council of India under the Advocate Act. […]
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA COMPILATION OF GUIDELINES TO BE FOLLOWED FOR ENTERTAINING LETTERS/PETITIONS RECEIVED IN THIS COURT AS PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION. (Based on full Court decision dated 1.12.1988 and subsequent modifications). No petition involving […]
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Re: Transparency in Collegium system. The Chief Justice of India proposed the following Agenda for consideration by the Collegium: “DECISION ON UPLOADING OF COLLEGIUM’S RESOLUTIONS WITH REASONS, ON EACH CANDIDATE FOR […]
