Reply To: Good faith means – parties generally must perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or arbitrarily (Canadian Supreme Court-2020)

Checkout Forums Civil Law Discourse Good faith means – parties generally must perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or arbitrarily (Canadian Supreme Court-2020) Reply To: Good faith means – parties generally must perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or arbitrarily (Canadian Supreme Court-2020)

#118596
advtanmoy
Keymaster

1- Applied: Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494; referred to: Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 1021; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 855; Kingstreet Investments Ltd. v. New Brunswick (Finance), 2007 SCC 1, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 3; Farber v. Royal Trust Co., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 846; St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette, 2008 SCC 64, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392; Bou Malhab v. Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc., 2011 SCC 9, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 214; Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 500; Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701; Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. v. Hydro‑Québec, 2018 SCC 46, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 101; Houle v. Canadian National Bank, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 122; Mayor of Bradford v. Pickles, [1895] A.C. 587; Allen v. Flood, [1898] A.C. 1; United Roasters, Inc. v. Colgate‑Palmolive Co., 649 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1981); IFP Technologies (Canada) Inc. v. EnCana Midstream and Marketing, 2017 ABCA 157, 53 Alta. L.R. (6th) 96; Xerex Exploration Ltd. v. Petro‑Canada, 2005 ABCA 224, 47 Alta. L.R. (4th) 6; Yam Seng Pte Ltd. v. International Trade Corp. Ltd., [2013] E.W.H.C. 111, [2013] 1 All E.R. (Comm.) 1321; Dunning v. Royal Bank (1996), 23 C.C.E.L. (2d) 71; Honda Canada Inc. v. Keays, 2008 SCC 39, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 362; Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19; PreMD Inc. v. Ogilvy Renault LLP, 2013 ONCA 412, 309 O.A.C. 139; Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 303; Lamb v. Kincaid (1907), 38 S.C.R. 516.

2-Applied: Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 494; referred to: Alevizos v. Nirula, 2003 MBCA 148, 180 Man. R. (2d) 186; Xerex Exploration Ltd. v. Petro‑Canada, 2005 ABCA 224, 47 Alta. L.R. (4th) 6; Opron Construction Co. v. Alberta (1994), 151 A.R. 241; Peek v. Gurney (1873), L.R. 6 H.L. 377; Outaouais Synergest Inc. v. Lang Michener LLP, 2013 ONCA 526, 116 O.R. (3d) 742; C.R.F. Holdings Ltd. v. Fundy Chemical International Ltd. (1981), 33 B.C.L.R. 291; Queen v. Cognos Inc., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 87; Styles v. Alberta Investment Management Corp., 2017 ABCA 1, 44 Alta. L.R. (6th) 214; Mohamed v. Information Systems Architects Inc., 2018 ONCA 428, 423 D.L.R. (4th) 174; Greenberg v. Meffert (1985), 50 O.R. (2d) 755; Mesa Operating Ltd. Partnership v. Amoco Canada Resources Ltd. (1994), 19 Alta. L.R. (3d) 38; Fidler v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, 2006 SCC 30, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 3; Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 303; Wood v. Grand Valley Rway. Co. (1915), 51 S.C.R. 283; Lamb v. Kincaid (1907), 38 S.C.R. 516; Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, 2014 SCC 21, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 433; Caisse populaire des Deux Rives v. Société mutuelle d’assurance contre l’incendie de la Vallée du Richelieu, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 995; Gilles E. Néron Communication Marketing Inc. v. Chambre des notaires du Québec, 2004 SCC 53, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 95; Moses v. Macferlan (1760), 2 Burr. 1005, 97 E.R. 676; Garland v. Consumers’ Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629; Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 1021; Bou Malhab v. Diffusion Métromédia CMR inc., 2011 SCC 9, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 214; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 543; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 855; Kingstreet Investments Ltd. v. New Brunswick (Finance), 2007 SCC 1, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 3; St. Lawrence Cement Inc. v. Barrette, 2008 SCC 64, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 392; Sport Maska Inc. v. Zittrer, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 564; Colonial Real Estate Co. v. La Communauté des Soeurs de la Charité de l’Hôpital Général de Montréal (1918), 57 S.C.R. 585; Birdair inc. v. Danny’s Construction Co., 2013 QCCA 580; Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2011 ABQB 637, 526 A.R. 1; Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19.