Reply To: 52 nd REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES IN INDIA

Checkout › Forums › Civil Law Discourse › 52 nd REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES IN INDIA › Reply To: 52 nd REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES IN INDIA

31/10/2022 at 08:26 #118714
advtanmoy
Keymaster

In Secretary, Malankara Syrian Catholic College v. T. Jose and Ors., (2007) 1 SCC 386, Court considered T.M.A. Pai Foundation (supra), and held that all laws made by the State to regulate the administration of educational institutions and grant of aid will apply to minority educational institutions also, but dilution of right under Article 30 is not permissible. The right under Article 30 is not above the law. The regulations or conditions concerning the welfare of the students and teachers should be made applicable to provide a proper academic atmosphere.

You may have missed

Joint statement following the 24th EU-Ukraine Summit (03/02/2023)
13 min read

Joint statement following the 24th EU-Ukraine Summit (03/02/2023)

2
Address by President of Russia Vladimir Putin to heads of Eurasian Economic Union member states (23/01/2023)
5 min read

Address by President of Russia Vladimir Putin to heads of Eurasian Economic Union member states (23/01/2023)

Address of Pope Francis to the officials of tribunal of Roman Rota for the inauguration of the Judicial Year (27/01/2023)
7 min read

Address of Pope Francis to the officials of tribunal of Roman Rota for the inauguration of the Judicial Year (27/01/2023)

Whether CESC can give a new connection by installing a new meter in tenanted portion to run a restaurant-“Yes”
7 min read

Whether CESC can give a new connection by installing a new meter in tenanted portion to run a restaurant-“Yes”