All

100 questions on procedure and maintenance for wife and child u/s 125 CrPC

Tagged: 100-Questions, maintenance, Section 125 CrPC.

This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year ago by advtanmoy.

Viewing 0 reply threads

Author

Posts
- 18/09/2022 at 09:01 #119077
  
  advtanmoy
  Keymaster
  
  In regard to third question, we hold that Sections 125 to 128 of the Code are not applicable after coming into force of the [Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986], save in so far as the parties exercise their option under Section 5 of the Act, to be governed by the provisions of Sections 125 to 128 of the Code.
  
  [See the full post at: 100 questions on procedure and maintenance for wife and child u/s 125 CrPC]
Author

Posts

Viewing 0 reply threads

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Judgments

Rahimal Bathu & Ors. Vs Ashiyal Beevi (27/9/2023)

Phulel Singh Vs. State of Haryana (27/09/2023)

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab (23/09/2014)

Smt. Roopa Soni Vs. Kamalnarayan Soni (06/09/2023)

Riya Bawri Etc. Vs. Mark Alexander Davidson & Ors (23/08/2023)

A judge is the pillar of entire justice system and public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from a judge (SC-10/12/2019) - A person discharging judicial duties acts on behalf of the State in discharge of its sovereign functions. Dispensation of justice is not only an onerous duty but has been considered as akin to discharge of a pious duty, and therefore, is a very serious matter. The standards of probity, conduct, integrity that may be relevant for discharge of duties by a careerist in another job cannot be the same for a judicial officer. A judge holds the office of a public trust. Impeccable integrity, unimpeachable independence with moral values embodied to the core are absolute imperatives which brooks no compromise. A judge is the pillar of the entire justice system and the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function. Judges must strive for the highest standards of integrity in both their professional and personal lives.
A daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act of her father’s property if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023) - A Hindu daughter has no right u/s 14 of Hindu Succession Act on the property of her father if it is occupied by her brother through adverse possession (SC-28/08/2023)- [See Pritam Singh v. State, AIR (1950) SC 169: (1950) SCR 453, Hem Raj v. State of Ajmer AIR (1954) SC 462: (1954) SCR 1133, Bengal Chemical & Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Employees, AIR (1959) SC 633: 1959 Supp (2) SCR 136: (1959) 1 LLJ 413, Municipal Board, Pratabgarh and Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Chawla and Ors. (1982) 3 SCC 331: (1983) SCC (L&S) 19, Taherakhatoon (dead) by LRs v. Salambin Mohammad (1999) 2 SCC 635]