- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 months, 3 weeks ago by .
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Legal Database
front page › Forums › Civil Law Discourse › JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR. Vs MUKESH SHARMA ETC. ETC. – [2022] 1 S.C.R. 842
Service Law – Regularization – Consequential benefits – Respondents-writ petitioners, were working on different posts in appellant-University for 15 to 30 years, on contractual / daily wage basis – They prayed for regularizing their services on ground of parity – Respondents-writ petitioners, were working on different posts in
appellant-University for 15 to 30 years, on contractual / daily wage
basis – They prayed for regularizing their services on ground of
parity with similarly situated employees who were confirmed and
were also granted regular pay scale – Writ petitions – High Court
directed the University to regularize the services of respondents
with all consequential benefits – Held: No reason to interfere with
the judgment passed by High Court granting regularization –
However, on facts, to meet the ends of justice, the actual
consequential benefits accruing from the regularization restricted
to three years prior to filing of the writ petitions.
[See the full post at: JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND ANR. Vs MUKESH SHARMA ETC. ETC. – [2022] 1 S.C.R. 842]