- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 months, 1 week ago by .
Viewing 0 reply threads
Viewing 0 reply threads
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Legal Database
Home › Forums › Civil Law Discourse › Whether oral evidence which is contrary to the contents of FIR supersedes over it in MACC (Case)?
Tagged: EVIDENCE, Motor Accident Claim
Yes, If any evidence before the Motor Accident Tribunal runs contrary to the contents in the First Information Report, the evidence which is recorded before the Tribunal has to be given weightage over the contents of the First Information Report.
[See the full post at: Whether oral evidence which is contrary to the contents of FIR supersedes over it in MACC (Case)?]